Search Explore

  • hash0 · 3 days ago

    This is a stunning idea and execution! I am glad I clicked on that link and spent a couple of minutes on it. Serious kudos, good Sir/Ma'am/[respectful appellation of your choosing].

    • pocksuppet · 3 days ago

      This has every sign of being advanced slop. Before I proceed further, can you provide any evidence that anything on this page corresponds to anything in reality?

      • NotGMan · 3 days ago

        Thats not the point of the presentatation: it's that Fable built a nice visualization.

        If Aristotle was right about it or not is an orthogonal argument.

        • polotics · 3 days ago

          The question was whether Aristotle's model, as valid as it may or not be, is faithfully represented here.

        • ActionHank · 3 days ago

          I think at some point soon, it's going to become really cringy to put out the typical purple background with neon colour slop site. I do hope that people start to remember that just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

        • bel8 · 3 days ago

          This looks like the usual https://threejs.org animation built by LLMs.

          I'm more interested in:

          - The correctedness of the data and if it was reviewed.

          - The skills and challenges while building it. Was it a one shot? Did it had a feedback loop?

          • Tossrock · 3 days ago

            Should billboard the text rendering so it doesn't go invisible at oblique viewing angles

            • docheinestages · 3 days ago

              Why do I have the feeling that the recent surge of "Fable built ..." is a marketing campaign by Anthropic?

              • gtirloni · 3 days ago

                I've tried Fable on a few complex tasks and couldn't tell the difference over Opus 4.8, tbh.

                • mcphage · 3 days ago

                  This kinda reminds me of the Pepsi Universe design doc. Random "hey let's make things like planets and orbits—that's science, right?"