Search Explore

  • 2key · 6 days ago

    interesting take not sure I 100% agree

    and yet, Interesting take

    • galsapir · 6 days ago

      curious where the disagreement lands: the claim i'm least sure of myself is that measurement alone already counts as activation (nothing in the weights changes, so it's a looser sense of the word than usual) the part i'd defend harder is the eval -> reward one: once a benchmark becomes the thing you train against, its flaws stop being measurement error and start being incentives. if you're pushing back somewhere in there, i'd genuinely like to hear it

    • Terretta · 4 days ago

      I wanted to like this and appreciated the genAI tokens were teased into a less AI-ish vernacular, but surfaces and honest caveats drifted back too far to overcome the "I'm human" signaling attempted through lowercase sentences and em dashes replaced with colons.

      I agree with the problem described within, and in the dead comment here.

      • galsapir · 3 days ago

        thanks for reading it properly and engaging with the argument!

        writing is hard, expressing ideas cleanly is harder! working on it.

      • zarzavat · 3 days ago

        What's with the lack of capitalization?

        • nnevatie · 3 days ago

          It is a new brand of a “cool” FAD.

        • kjeiwoo · 2 days ago

          The flaw becomes an incentive...Goood point