Search Explore

  • azalemeth · 6 days ago

    For what it is worth, your site has been blocked by the UK's national cyber security centre on my current connection:

        This site may be associated with malicious activity or malware.
     Access to this site has been blocked by the Protective DNS Service
    Site: wtf.korridzy.com
    Please contact your local Network Administrator or IT support if you require further assistance


    Look up this site on Cloudflare Radar [1] for more information.
    I would wear this as a badge of pride!

    [1] https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/wtf.korridzy.com

    • graemep · 6 days ago

      It looks like its blocked by Cloudflare Radar.

      I do not think the NCSC blocks sites. I have never come across a site block ordered by them. Most blocks I see are by sites themselves blocking Uk visitors for GDPR or OSA reasons.

    • Korridzy · 6 days ago

      I can see 7 visitors from the UK in the last 30 minutes. It looks like no restrictions.

      • rc1 · 6 days ago

        It’s an opt in service. Not the UK as a whole blocked.

      • llm_nerd · 6 days ago

        It is blocked by Cloudflare, and it looks like the reason is simply that it's a super new domain so it's just an overly cautious thing.

        • Korridzy · 6 days ago

          A pity. I've really made this blog a couple days ago. This is my first post in it :)

          • threecheese · 6 days ago

            Indeed. I read the entire article, it was great. Domains can be a big PITA.

            • antonvs · 6 days ago

              It’s only blocked for users that are using a particular Protected DNS service. It’s fairly unusual to block a domain just because it’s new, with no other negative signals. The PDNS being used here seems to be configured very strictly. It’s certainly not an all-UK block.

        • nijave · 6 days ago

          Any chance you'll retest with latest iterations of models?

          Opus 4.8, GLM-5.2, Kimi K2.7, etc

          • Korridzy · 6 days ago

            It’s quite possible I’ll do that with a new work-related task. I regularly run similar experiments for myself, so I decided to write about one of them.

          • holoduke · 6 days ago

            Even for a ui change fable complained about policy issues. This model is unusable

            • overgard · 6 days ago

              I had a pretty rough experience with Fable today. At first, Claude showed a message that Fable was available again, but if I typed /model it showed the same "disabled" state for the export controls, so that was sloppy. After I got it working (I had to login again), I asked it to do a security audit of a server I've written, and it spent a few tokens and then "flagged" the request and downgraded to Opus 4.8. Opus 4.8 just kind of glazed me for writing secure code without finding anything important.

              By the way, I ran ccusage afterwards and if I had been paying API rates I would have apparently spent $6.88 for that.

              Amazing stuff Anthropic.

              • clickclas · 6 days ago

                https://www.anthropic.com/news/redeploying-fable-5

                The US government has forced them to make the filters even stricter than they already were. It feels meaningfully worse than during its initial release.

                Amazing stuff, Trump voters.

                And amazing stuff to Amazon's CEO, who threw a tantrum on the basis of misinformation and created this whole mess and has how resulting in permanent government handicapping of American models. Genius move.

                • overgard · 6 days ago

                  I don't like any of those people so I'm not disagreeing, but I feel like this is 100% on anthropic for their constant doom trolling. They're not trying to be "responsible", they just want to scare people and it worked.

                  • antonvs · 6 days ago

                    Why not both? Tattling to the Feds about a competitor over something like this is a dick move, even by the nearly nonexistent ethical standards of Silicon Valley currently.

                • whythismatters · 6 days ago

                  Same story here. Wanted to give Fable a spin, session got flagged mid-execution of the plan (some innocent react-native code), things fell back to Opus, and then my "current session" usage limit ran out. So I ended up with a partial and broken Fopus implementation.

                • andersmurphy · 6 days ago

                  Wait what? gpt5.5 is better than fable. I thought fable was the endtimes?!

                  Wonder if this is because fable swirches down to opus for somethings without telling you?

                  • reckless · 6 days ago

                    Takeaways Which model to use for generating architecture.

                    The simpler the decision you need to make, the more readily you can just take a proposal from Fable or GPT-5.5. And now that Fable is unavailable outside the US, the choice between Opus and GPT is far from obvious. As a quick default I'd lean toward GPT.

                    • sroerick · 6 days ago

                      I'm curious how folks here are using LangGraph