Search Explore

  • aanet · 4 months ago

    Too delightful. Like a reverse jenga tower you like to topple over.

    Of course, glad to see it was another @isohedral project.

    • efilife · 4 months ago

      If only it wouldn't collapse by itself after clicking anywhere (clicking seems to activate physics) this would be 10/10

      • koolba · 4 months ago

        > If only it wouldn't collapse by itself after clicking anywhere (clicking seems to activate physics) this would be 10/10

        I think that's the other metaphor here.

        It's not just standing on the tiny shoulders of one forgotten maintainer. The entire system only appears stable because we're looking at a snapshot of it.

        In reality it's already collapsing.

        • glkindlmann · 4 months ago

          but I came here for amusement, not existential dread.

          • gchamonlive · 4 months ago

            Nobody expects ~the Spanish inquisition~ existential dread

        • moebrowne · 4 months ago

          Yeah. Seems like there is ~0 friction.

          • upsuper · 4 months ago

            And that tiny thing is actually one of the last to collapse...

          • panzi · 4 months ago

            Register the mousemove event handler on window, then you will still get the events when the mouse moves out of the window/frame while dragging and it won't be that buggy.

            • DaanDL · 4 months ago

              Was about to comment the same. It's a common mistake/gotcha.

              • benrutter · 4 months ago

                Possibly dumb question, but does that still hold inside p5js?

                • virgil_disgr4ce · 4 months ago

                  p5 is just a wrapper that adds the setup() and draw() functions, so yes

              • pierrec · 4 months ago

                Come on, HN, you can't let this information stay under the front page for 13 hours and everyone's like "ah yes of course". Please don't register the mousemove event handler on window, that old school hack never really worked and was obsoleted 10 years ago when the pointer API became standard.

                Things are much nicer now and the problem is entirely avoided by using pointer events: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/set...

              • fallingmeat · 4 months ago

                oh look at that. removing IBM enterprise apps really doesn’t break anything and the whole stack got lighter. science.

                • rob74 · 4 months ago

                  Did you actually manage to remove a block without everything collapsing (eventually)? Then you must have an incredibly steady hand, it's nearly impossible to do as far as I can see. Which can also be interpreted as a metaphor for the state of the tech stack, I guess...

                • mezod · 4 months ago

                  this is the best thing internet since the last best thing in the internet

                  • crokie123 · 4 months ago

                    What’s the Nebraska project?

                  • 1e1a · 4 months ago

                    It looks like the stroke/border is not taken into account in the physics simulation.

                    • LoganDark · 4 months ago

                      This can be fixed by:

                             for (let re of rects) {
         push();
         translate(re.body.position.x, re.body.position.y);
         rotate(re.body.angle);
    -    rect(0, 0, re.w, re.h, 2);
    +    rect(0, 0, re.w - 1, re.h - 1, 2);
         pop();
       }

                    • tobylane · 4 months ago

                      I'd like a medal for clearing the screen of all debris. What's that you say, some of it is still useful? oh

                      • _nivlac_ · 4 months ago

                        Now we just need a generated version of this based on a package.json!

                        • louisbourgault · 4 months ago

                          Really cool! To be honest, when I clicked on this I had a hope that it would be possible to add things to the stack like the ongoing memes of just putting different things in there (maybe live with other people as a collaborative editor).

                            • sumo89 · 4 months ago

                              The shark biting the cable is what gets me

                              • Projectiboga · 4 months ago

                                I like that the hand crank is going counter-clockwise

                                • Nevermark · 4 months ago

                                  Crap, I saw it as clockwise. (Furious reversal of effort…)

                                • b3lvedere · 4 months ago

                                  Oh wow! :)

                                  Thank you for the laughs. I needed that!

                                  • SideburnsOfDoom · 4 months ago

                                    given the events of the last few days, one could add a Shahed drone too.

                                    • skyberrys · 4 months ago

                                      Can someone help me understand the single brick at the very bottom under Linux? What is it representing?

                                      • apsurd · 4 months ago

                                        The cables at the bottom of the ocean.

                                        • CarVac · 4 months ago

                                          Undersea cables. With a shark biting one.

                                          • rtkwe · 4 months ago

                                            The undersea cables actually connecting the entire internet. Sometimes sharks just take a bite of them, they're reasonable well protected but it's enough damage to cause outages and disruptions.

                                            It's the single pin under everything because there are a limited number of those cables especially in some regions so a single shark can take out the entire internet for some countries.

                                            http://www.mirceakademy.com/uploads/MSA2024-6-6.pdf

                                            • Hamuko · 4 months ago

                                              I feel like having them as a single brick is a bit hyperbolic, since undersea cables are pretty redundant in most of the world. Get rid of one and traffic just routes around it. Ships have been routinely destroying cables in the Gulf of Finland and the Baltic Sea in the past couple of years without causing significant disruptions.

                                              • drob518 · 4 months ago

                                                The whole Internet was designed for precisely this use case. If there is an outage, the distributed system will try to find another path. No actual central point of failure. As you say, the single brick is hyperbolic. But yea, those sharks can certainly be disruptive at times.

                                                • rezonant · 4 months ago

                                                  Well that depends on how much traffic that cable was supporting, how much free capacity is available on other cables heading to the same area, how much additional latency the rerouting will add and how sensitive to latency the rerouted traffic is doesn't it?

                                                  • rtkwe · 4 months ago

                                                    Only mildly. There's not huge amounts of dark capacity just sitting around waiting to take over so if a major fiber connection goes down the remainder will get congested with the extra capacity. It won't cascade like a power outage but the remaining lines will slow down.

                                                    • dijit · 4 months ago

                                                      "most of the world" is doing a seriously large amount of heavy lifting in this sentence.

                                                      There are many regions that are served by a single line, more than you think.

                                                      Even "well connected" places have fewer cables than you expect, and the frustrating thing is that you don't know that you can route around an issue until you try.

                                                      BGP is really resilient, which is great, but if your path is not clear then you'll only realise it when the failover doesn't happen, you'll think there's a redundant path.

                                                    • zahlman · 4 months ago

                                                      Do satellite networks not move the needle in terms of capacity/reliability now?

                                                      • rtkwe · 4 months ago

                                                        No. They're not setup to be a principal route between two nations and most satellite networks until very recently didn't even route messages through other satellites but instead retransmitted them to a ground station with access to hardline internet. Even Starlink mostly does this still because it's way cheaper and easier.

                                                        • rtkwe · 4 months ago

                                                          You can see an unofficial tracker [0] of the Starlink downlink network and see how outside of some rural areas your data is only moving a few tens of miles away most of the time before it's sent down to a ground system. Their sats have 3 200 Gbps laser communicators for intra constellation routing which is pretty small for the task of replacing fiber optic links.

                                                          [0] https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1805q6rlePY4WZd8QMO...

                                                          • gzread · 4 months ago

                                                            God, those nicknames. The Algo of Power GW (gateway?) the Pew Pew GW? Elon chose these.

                                                            • rtkwe · 4 months ago

                                                              It's all so pick me. Like his insistence that he's a top level gamer.

                                                        • roughly · 4 months ago

                                                          I never understand why questions like this get downvoted around here.

                                                          • SauntSolaire · 4 months ago

                                                            They don't, you just have to wait longer than an hour for an accurate rating

                                                          • toast0 · 4 months ago

                                                            Only a little bit. Just clicking around, a new Hawaii cable is supposed to have 24 Fiber Pairs and 18Tbit per Fiber Pair at the end of this year. If you lose several tbits of bandwidth, you're going to have a hard time making it up with satellite.

                                                            For small island countries and such, satellite capacity may be sufficient; and it is likely helpful for keeping international calling alive even if it's not sufficient for international data. But when you drop capacity by a factor of 1000, it's going to be super messy.

                                                            • fc417fc802 · 4 months ago

                                                              Conceptually, it's the difference between your wifi versus running a single fiber to each room in your house. The difference in bandwidth is multiple orders of magnitude.

                                                              This is never going to change because from a physical perspective free radio is a shared medium while each individual fiber (or wire) has its own private bandwidth.

                                                              • rcxdude · 4 months ago

                                                                The capacity of satellite networks is minuscule compared to that of undersea fibre optics.

                                                                • jpease · 4 months ago

                                                                  Plus still have to contend with the space sharks.

                                                            • forrestpitz · 4 months ago

                                                              Looks like an undersea cable to me

                                                            • i-zu · 4 months ago

                                                              One of DNS pillars should be replaced by BGP.

                                                              • mhink · 4 months ago

                                                                And NTP, if I recall correctly.

                                                                • JeanSebTr · 4 months ago

                                                                  When was that?

                                                                  • rezonant · 4 months ago

                                                                    When was BGP? Or when was NTP?

                                                                    • Sohcahtoa82 · 4 months ago

                                                                      I think it was a joke based on NTP being a time protocol.

                                                                      • jibal · 4 months ago

                                                                        whoosh

                                                                      • ordu · 4 months ago

                                                                        Apparently it is impossible to find the time or place to add them.

                                                                  • Sohcahtoa82 · 4 months ago

                                                                    The "Whatever Microsoft is doing" bit was always my favorite.

                                                                    • stackghost · 4 months ago

                                                                      The depiction of Microsoft as "angry birds coming to indiscriminately fuck everything up" is absolutely on point for Microsoft in 2025/26

                                                                    • tw04 · 4 months ago

                                                                      AWS definitely lives above unpaid developers. In fact they should probably be the bird flying straight at the unpaid developers as they force yet another company to move to a closed license to survive.

                                                                      • publicdebates · 4 months ago

                                                                        You don't think AWS is internally built on massive amounts of open source?

                                                                        • sethaurus · 4 months ago

                                                                          That's what it would mean to place them above unpaid developers in the illustration, yes.

                                                                      • wink · 4 months ago

                                                                        the weird physics are mildly infuriating. still funny though

                                                                        • eastbound · 4 months ago

                                                                          That is the joke, I think. The game is to touch anything and try to not make the rest fall down.

                                                                          • seba_dos1 · 4 months ago

                                                                            Simply clicking on the empty background already makes things fall down.

                                                                            • wink · 4 months ago

                                                                              Not sure. It's not it being unstable, it's small bricks moving bigger stuff to the side and maybe even upward. If I missed the joke I just don't find it funny.

                                                                          • egorfine · 4 months ago

                                                                            We absolutely need a "whatever Microsoft is doing" object in that.

                                                                            • knowtheory · 4 months ago

                                                                              I love that the initial state itself isn't stable.

                                                                              The world keeps moving around us. Can't choose staying still.

                                                                              • tyleo · 4 months ago

                                                                                Interesting! It's stable on my machine. I wonder if this is due to floating-point differences.

                                                                                • andai · 4 months ago

                                                                                  On my machine, the initial state isn't simulated. It only begins simulation when I touch it. At which point, the weight causes the bottom blocks to intersect each other significantly.

                                                                                  • FireInsight · 4 months ago

                                                                                    For me, bottom blocks stay still while those on the very top fall down.

                                                                                    • Hamuko · 4 months ago

                                                                                      If I open it, click on the background to activate the physics and just keep the tab open, pretty much all of the blocks that can collapse do eventually collapse.

                                                                                      • smikhanov · 4 months ago

                                                                                        The Nebraska guy’s block remains surprisingly stable, even when the whole thing above it collapses. Very symbolic.

                                                                                    • tyleo · 4 months ago

                                                                                      Maybe that's what I'm seeing.

                                                                                      • rob74 · 4 months ago

                                                                                        One more pedantic nitpick: when a block gets wedged between two blocks at an angle, it gets slowly pushed out, although there is a lot of weight resting on the top block. That would be realistic only (maybe) if the blocks were made of ice, but not for other materials...

                                                                                        • withinboredom · 4 months ago

                                                                                          Another reason not to let ice on the internet.

                                                                                          • clickety_clack · 4 months ago

                                                                                            Coefficient of friction is way too low.

                                                                                        • danhau · 4 months ago

                                                                                          I‘m guessing it‘s somewhat framerate-dependent.

                                                                                        • LanceH · 4 months ago

                                                                                          That's the javascript effect.

                                                                                          • rtkwe · 4 months ago

                                                                                            Nah that's just the effect of turning on the simulation. The initial version isn't the same as the first steps because there's no weight. If you look closely after you click the blocks overlap slightly.

                                                                                            Something similar happens all the time in games when you go from a static version of something to the higher level of detail version with physics enabled, if the transition isn't handled gracefully or early enough you can get snapping.

                                                                                          • arcadianalpaca · 4 months ago

                                                                                            Just like real life. Sit still, touch nothing, and watch everything fall apart all on its own ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

                                                                                          • normie3000 · 4 months ago

                                                                                            It's like open source Angry Birds.

                                                                                            • lwhi · 4 months ago

                                                                                              Who are the big blocks that survive the collapse though?

                                                                                              • latexr · 4 months ago

                                                                                                Some BSD server somewhere which was last rebooted in 1994. No one is really sure where it’s physically located, but it keeps everything running.

                                                                                            • jascha_eng · 4 months ago

                                                                                              This is oddly fun to play with. Has that angry birds vibe

                                                                                              • briansm · 4 months ago

                                                                                                Just to mention the original was cited in the most recent Veritasium video:

                                                                                                "The Internet Was Weeks Away From Disaster and No One Knew"

                                                                                                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoag03mSuXQ

                                                                                                (at about the 9:50 mark)

                                                                                                  • ink_13 · 4 months ago

                                                                                                    Oh cool, a product of Waterloo's Craig Kaplan, most famous for his work on the discovery of the einstein monotile

                                                                                                    • zahlman · 4 months ago

                                                                                                      > In my online undergraduate P5.js course, students are about to begin the module on motion and physics, including a bit of physics simulation using Matter.js.

                                                                                                      When did things get specialized this much?

                                                                                                      • hendersonreed · 4 months ago

                                                                                                        Looking through the website of the course, it's not really a general computer science course - it "explores the use of graphics in art, design and visualization contexts" and is part of the digital art program. Quite a reasonable tech stack, for that purpose I think.

                                                                                                    • josefritzishere · 4 months ago

                                                                                                      This is very real.

                                                                                                      • bbx · 4 months ago

                                                                                                        I was expecting it to open the FFmpeg website at the end.

                                                                                                        • palad1n · 4 months ago

                                                                                                          THIS IS THE BEST THING EVAR!

                                                                                                          • venusenvy47 · 4 months ago

                                                                                                            Is this website intended to break HN on Android? I've never had a website lock up the HN app like this. I couldn't back out, and I was stuck in a loop when the app restarted on the same page.

                                                                                                            • andai · 4 months ago

                                                                                                              App?

                                                                                                            • whackernews · 4 months ago

                                                                                                              Im sure whatever’s happening isn’t intended but I did experience jankyness when trying to use the back button on Safari on iOS. It wouldn’t let me go back.

                                                                                                            • CivBase · 4 months ago

                                                                                                              It'd be really cool (and probably useful) if someone could figure out a way to generate diagrams like this for any software project.

                                                                                                              You'd first need to figure out a way to generate a complete dependency tree. For each box, I interpret its height as a measure of its complexity and its width as a measure of the support it receives. The hardest part would probably be figuring out a way to quantitatively measure those values.

                                                                                                              • TonyStr · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                One naiive solution could be to cloc the dependency and use the size as the height, and fetch number of github contributors as width

                                                                                                                  • withinboredom · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                    bro. it asks for the ability for some random github user to literally take over your private repositories.

                                                                                                                    • claar · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                      Yeah, if it weren't for that, I think this would blow up. Plus, even if you get past that, if you try a larger project, it times out after 1 minute and gives up. But it's a pretty awesome idea!

                                                                                                                      • matzehuels · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                        hey! I built this, I know its really scrappy, I just don't have enough time currently to make right by users. I'm on it though... stay tuned

                                                                                                                      • matzehuels · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                        You’re 100% right to call that out. The current GitHub OAuth scope is too broad

                                                                                                                        I’m changing this ASAP to least-privilege and I’ll publish a clear explanation of scopes + data handling. In the meantime: please run the local/CLI path if you want zero-trust.

                                                                                                                        • withinboredom · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                          Damn dude. That’s awesome! I saw the permissions it wanted out of every org I’m a part of (including some big open source orgs) — I’d probably find myself booted out of those orgs if I accepted that. They def get a notification on every authentication like that and take potential impersonation seriously.

                                                                                                                      • CivBase · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                        Oh cool. That's a promising start.

                                                                                                                        I don't know if the "The Nebraska Guy Ranking" this project uses is very useful, though. In particular the "depth" criteria doesn't make much sense to me, since it assumes the more foundational a dependency is, the more robust it must be. This seems to run counter to the point of the original comic where the "Nebraska Guy" piece was the fragile block holding up the entire tower.

                                                                                                                        This project also doesn't attempt to measure or visualize the complexity of a project. Theoretically a more complex project would require more support than a simple one, so I think that's an important metric to capture.

                                                                                                                    • MagicMoonlight · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                      The blocks feel a little bit too slippery

                                                                                                                      • inanutshellus · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                        Feature request - be able to change the text and re-share it.

                                                                                                                        Half the fun of this xkcd is referring to it in context of whatever just went haywire.

                                                                                                                        • withinboredom · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                          The source code is right there ... just change the background image to whatever you want.

                                                                                                                          • inanutshellus · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                            Ha! ^_^

                                                                                                                            That text is literally the only thing hardcoded. It's inside a PNG, sourced in.

                                                                                                                            I get it though. Reproducing that cutesy "hand drawn" text would be a pain in the arse if you didn't just have the font.[1]

                                                                                                                                [1] https://github.com/ipython/xkcd-font

                                                                                                                        • 9dev · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                          I hope Randall reads HN and sees this, he’d love it.

                                                                                                                          • mghackerlady · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                            I'd be surprised if he didn't read HN at least occasionally

                                                                                                                          • merryocha · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                            I knew exactly what this would be before even clicking it. Someone had to make it!

                                                                                                                            • rererereferred · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                              There is so many xkcd things, I didn't know which it would be.

                                                                                                                              • fragmede · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                It's 2,347. There's also 927. And 538, and who can forget 386. 936 is also a classic. 1205 is a favorite, although AI changes the scales these days. As does 303. 1838 is another good one for when CC is "thinking". 1425.

                                                                                                                                Edit oh and Extrapolating out; 605.

                                                                                                                                • garbagepatch · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                  And it's all a meta commentary on 915.

                                                                                                                            • seydor · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                              without touching the block, after a while it begins collapsing, which makes it an even better representation of infrastructure

                                                                                                                              • PenguinRevolver · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                I love that clicking the empty space and just doing nothing at all still causes the blocks to fall apart after some time.

                                                                                                                                • ASalazarMX · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                  Since it's going to collapse anyway, it's fun to table flip everything using the botton block.

                                                                                                                                • jasonjmcghee · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                  Played with it on the phone. So satisfying.

                                                                                                                                  I know the time it takes to get something to feel this good.

                                                                                                                                  Really fantastic work.

                                                                                                                                  • harvie · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                    No title text, No respect...

                                                                                                                                    • AshamedCaptain · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                      Liked those small Box2D playboxes from decades ago, wonder where all that went.

                                                                                                                                      • barddoo · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                        Increase friction

                                                                                                                                        • BoneShard · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                          On an unrelated note, AI completely changed economics of https://xkcd.com/1205/

                                                                                                                                          Previously I'd postpone some tooling since I'd lost more time on it (unless it's something I wanted to learn anyway), but now I'm all in.

                                                                                                                                          • kyle-rb · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                            Plus "a dev typing real fast" from the XKCD Stack (https://xkcd.com/1636/) is now feasible.

                                                                                                                                          • foltik · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                            Very satisfying. I ripped out the load bearing piece and everything stayed standing except for the tiny pieces at the very top. Doesn't seem so bad according to the simulations, maybe we could use a good shakeup?

                                                                                                                                            • zavg · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                              I would like to have online multiplayer version of Jenga game based on these mechanics

                                                                                                                                              • Nevermark · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                As entropy increases, the stack rises.

                                                                                                                                                But then, when trapped in a local maxima prohibiting growth, pressure builds as too many new layers attempt to shim themselves under existing layers, until inevitably the stack collapses somewhere.

                                                                                                                                                Then new layers can restart generating new apex baby layers on a now higher foundation of fertile fragmented but compressed and stable new-legacy rubble. Another point-oh age begins.

                                                                                                                                                And sometimes, the stack just falls apart because.

                                                                                                                                                In between those extinction events, layers that spawn the most layers, and form opportunistic bridges over lateral layers, dominate and thrive.

                                                                                                                                                Occasionally, some layers try to reorder themselves to optimize future growth. Or tunnel down to achieve stronger footing. But like the tower of Hanoi, the more layers involved, the more intractable the replanting and reordering. Meanwhile, other growth routes around them. Yet, many instances of these failed structures can be found in the depths.

                                                                                                                                                • bddicken · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                  epic

                                                                                                                                                  • c_hastings · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                    That was a lot of fun actually. I used one block to wreck all the others. Thanks for sharing.

                                                                                                                                                    • throwawayk7h · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                      I would add some lerp-smoothing to the position of the cursor/touch, since it's a bit rigid. Click-drag-release often doesn't result in a fling but rather a sharp drop.

                                                                                                                                                      Lovely idea by the way.

                                                                                                                                                      • lencastre · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                        needs angry birds version

                                                                                                                                                        or not, it’s great as is BTW

                                                                                                                                                        • snalty · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                          This reminds me of one of my favourite flash games, Fantastic Contraption, for some reason.

                                                                                                                                                          • dmitrygr · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                            I think you may have set friction too low

                                                                                                                                                              • JimmaDaRustla · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                funny, but poorly coded because there's not friction coefficient it seems - just clicking into the applet, everything eventually just falls over

                                                                                                                                                                • cnees · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                  Challenge: Rearrange the blocks into a stable configuration without losing any offscreen

                                                                                                                                                                    • andrewflnr · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                      If you just let the simulation fall apart under its inherent instability, the thanklessly maintained project is often one of the last things to fall. That seems poetically correct.

                                                                                                                                                                      • bitwize · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                        Ooooh, that's fun to make topple. I kind of want to launch an Angry Bird at it.

                                                                                                                                                                        • shadowgovt · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                          It's adorable. One small criticism: instead of being stored as initial conditions with no internal forces, if the tooling allows for it it should be stored as the "relaxed" state with internal forces. As it stands, the first interaction with it causes the whole model to 'bump' because everything is actually just kinda hovering in space with no physics simulation happening and only the first interaction causes physics calculations to start.

                                                                                                                                                                          • andyjohnson0 · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                            This is wonderful.

                                                                                                                                                                            The gravitational constant is maybe a little low for my taste, but I like that I can fling a block vertically up off the top of the frame and it reappears even 5+ seconds later. Things don't get ignored out of existence. Neat.

                                                                                                                                                                            • poolnoodle · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                              The physics remind me of Little Inferno

                                                                                                                                                                                  • zygentoma · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                                    I love that the thing of itself is completely unstable once you click somewhere to start the simulation … :)

                                                                                                                                                                                    • tempestn · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                                      Accidentally discovered you can quantum tunnel blocks through the weak link to shore it up!

                                                                                                                                                                                      • LoganDark · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                                        I noticed that when I drag an object, the force appears to originate from the object's center of mass rather than from my cursor. So it feels a little weird.

                                                                                                                                                                                        • nine_k · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                                          If I ever end up developing a package / dependency manager, I'll be strongly tempted to call it "jenga".

                                                                                                                                                                                          • alienbaby · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                                            Ooh I didn't expect that make me grin and be satisfying at the same time.

                                                                                                                                                                                            • claysmithr · 4 months ago

                                                                                                                                                                                              It's funny even when you touch nothing it still collapses.