Someday aliens will land and all will be fine until we explain our calendar
https://twitter.com/foone/status/1572260363764400129
thunderbong · 3 years ago
165 comments
https://twitter.com/foone/status/1572260363764400129
thunderbong · 3 years ago
165 comments
MisterSandman · 3 years ago
shit like this is too good and entertaining to be on twitter
superkuh · 3 years ago
Yeah, it's a shame it's hidden behind a computational paywall.
bombcar · 3 years ago
Our calendar and timekeeping is what you get when you keep a system continuously operational and backwards capable over tens of thousands of years.
okwubodu · 3 years ago
First recorded instance of spaghetti code?
fabatka · 3 years ago
Exactly what I was thinking! It'd be interesting to see this as a git log (maybe with different branches for different cultures)
bombcar · 3 years ago
That would be quite fun to setup - especially all the patches to the leap year setup heh. Could even make bug reports “Christmas is happening in March what is going on”
rsynnott · 3 years ago
It's _not_ very backwards compatible, though; in particular, different countries transitioned from Julian to Gregorian at different times, so things get _extremely_ messy if you go back more than about a century.
eurasiantiger · 3 years ago
Since when do we assume everyone uses the same calendar?
uoaei · 3 years ago
Even the 12-hour system (vs 24-) is used by a relatively small minority of Earth's population.
bananamerica · 3 years ago
The 12h and 24h system is essentially the same thing, no? In my country we use a 24h system in writing, but mainly a 12h system in speech.
mcv · 3 years ago
I think most of the world does that. I don't believe the claims that almost nobody uses the 12h format. At least not without a very thorough survey of the many ways many cultures use time.
bananamerica · 3 years ago
In Brazil we'll say things like "The party is at 8 da noite", where "da noite" means "at night". When context is obvious, we often ommit that, so I might say "We will have lunch at 1 one clock" meaning 13h because it is obvious that no one has lunch at 1am. We will generally use 24h time in writing because we cannot control context, and in other situations where ambiguity cannot be avoided otherwise.
To me the main advantage of 24h time is that it is easier to mentally calculate time, so for example 3 hours after 11:00 is just 11+3, which is 14:00h.
davchana · 3 years ago
In Punjabi we have divided day into 8 parts, with each 2 parts have names like 1st pair (3am to 9am), 2nd pair 9am to 3pm) third pair 3pm to 9pm & final pair 9pm to 3am.
So, we usually say, 8 o clock in third pair means PM, or 8 o clock in 1st pair means AM.
petesergeant · 3 years ago
The look on an American's face when you describe something as being "a fortnight away"
ghaff · 3 years ago
Not sure what that has to do with calendars. Fortnight is just one of many measurements that aren't used a lot in the US (among other places) these days so I wouldn't expect the average person on the street to immediately recognize what it means. There are a ton of imperial measurements that aren't widely used like pecks, bushels, rods, etc.
(I'd also avoid terminology like bi-monthly and semi-monthly as it's a predictable point of confusion.)
Symbiote · 3 years ago
Everyone in Britain knows what a fortnight is, and the word is in normal use.
We are confused when TSA staff in the US talk about quart bags.
ghaff · 3 years ago
It’s just not a word in everyday speech.
A quart is the easy one. It’s just a slightly smaller version of a liter. And it’s not like the UK doesn’t use pints which are just half of a slightly larger quart.
I’m sure there’s lots of language including unrelated to measurement which differs across the Anglosphere.
case0x00 · 3 years ago
Yeah seeing this today is funny given today begins Rosh Hashanah, the Hebrew new year. But I imagine _most_ countries of the world use the gregorian, especially those on english-speaking sites
Someone · 3 years ago
> "At the start of the year?"
> "nah. The end of the second month"
> "WHY WOULD IT BE THE SECOND MONTH?"
Because leap day is at the end of the year, but at some time we moved the start of the year two months back (same reason why September through December now are the ninth through twelfth month of the year, not the seventh through tenth)
(Historically, I think it was slightly different. February, the last month of the year was shorter because the year isn’t long enough to give it 30 days, then we moved the start of the year, and then we invented the Gregorian calendar, and picked February for the leap day because it already was an outlier)
Svip · 3 years ago
It was the Romans who inserted a leap month inside February between the 23rd and 24th. Since the two consuls ruled on alternating months, adding an extra month after February would give one consul one more ruling month, making it somewhat unfair. Since leap years were handled irregularly back then, they were leap months, not leap days.
The Julian calendar introduced the leap day instead, and maintained it in February as originally, and introduced it every 4 years (except years dividable by 100).
This is also around the same time that July and August were named to their current names (named after Caesar and Augustus). Before that, they had had names equal to fifth and sixth month, respectively, like September comes from seventh.
bonzini · 3 years ago
The Julian calendar didn't have the divisible-by-100 rule, every other fourth year was leap.
MayeulC · 3 years ago
Julius and Augustus you mean, both were Caesars (Augustus, AKA Octavian, was adopted).
wartijn_ · 3 years ago
Are you suggesting that the men were known as Julius Caesar and Augustus Caesar? Because that's wrong[0]. Augustus used this name and it became a title for roman Emperors, in reference to Julius Caesar. If people are talking about Caesar, they mean Julius Caesar.
MayeulC · 3 years ago
I understand that people often refer to Julius Caesar as "Caesar", but to me at least, it mainly refers to the "title" (though that remains a surname, as succession was hereditary, mostly through adoption).
History is not my field, I am probably making multiple mistakes and oversimplifying, but I don't see something in that link that disproves what I said. Today, we often refer to Augustus as Augustus Caesar or Caesar Augustus (less frequently, Emperor Augustus). I also think it's interesting to point out Julius's first name in light of the previous discussion, as that's where the month name comes from.
Ash_Crow · 3 years ago
If we're splitting hair, Octavian was adopted into the gens Julia, so he was a Julius as much as he was a Caesar, and his full name before ascending to emperor was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus.
InCityDreams · 3 years ago
>Before that, they had had names equal to fifth and sixth month, respectively, like September comes from seventh.
Now, do i google, duckduckgo, or bing, what those months were called?
Fifth collumism? Sexism?
jcranmer · 3 years ago
Quintilis and Sextilis are their names.
mcv · 3 years ago
I recently read that the reason February has only 28 or 29 days, and not 29 or 39, as you'd expect, is because Augustus wanted his month to have just as many days as Julius' month.
No idea if that's true, but sounds appropriate for the ego of an emperor.
cperciva · 3 years ago
February, the last month of the year was shorter because the year isn’t long enough to give it 30 days
Originally February had 30 days, along with all the other months. (The 5 or 6 remaining days at various times were either extra days which didn't belong to a month or were omitted until there was a month's worth of them to catch up on.)
February got shorter because (being the last month of the year) it had days removed in order to add them to other months -- what was originally February 30th (the end of the year) became February 23rd (the end of the year, after which the leap day is inserted).
JoeAltmaier · 3 years ago
Augustus and Julius stole a day from February so theirs' would be long ones.
jcranmer · 3 years ago
February had 28 days before Julius Caesar came to power, so he and his successor couldn't have stolen a day from it.
JoeAltmaier · 3 years ago
Wait. The calendar was 10 months before Julius. Not sure there was even a February?
jcranmer · 3 years ago
No, the calendar had 12 months + 1 intercalary month before the Julian reforms. The calendar you're thinking of was the one supposedly introduced by Romulus and replaced by his successor--there's no evidence of its actual use.
miniwark · 3 years ago
The Ethiopian calendar still do this, 12 months of 30 days each and a last 5 to 6 "month".
The reddit thread is funny but it also forget than there is not only one calendar in the actual world... Long time ago, i have meet an indian who was never able to explain to me witch days he was forbidden to eat meat (he was not a strict vegetarian), or even food at all. It was probably a mix of one of the indian calendars, horoscope and religion.
cperciva · 3 years ago
My understanding is that the Ethiopian calendar is basically the ancient Egyptian calendar aside from some names changing.
silvestrov · 3 years ago
He didn't mention LEAP-SECONDS which are at THE END OF THE YEAR.
detaro · 3 years ago
or june 30th
Someone · 3 years ago
Indeed. See https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/leap-se...
And they always are end of June or December in UTC time, so locally they can happen on the first of January or first or July.
jcranmer · 3 years ago
> Because leap day is at the end of the year, but at some time we moved the start of the year two months back (same reason why September through December now are the ninth through twelfth month of the year, not the seventh through tenth)
There is actually no hard evidence that the Romans ever started their calendar in March instead of January. The earliest contemporaneous use of the calendar relies on January 1 as the start of the year, short February, and with intercalation happening after (or maybe within) February.
The primary evidence we use to indicate that the start of the year shifted is... the apparently wrong month names. Some writers did describe a calendar that starts at March and ends in December, with winter basically having no proper calendar--but these are writers describing how their calendar worked several centuries ago, attributing it to mythological figures, and the explanation strikes me as very heavily a "just so" explanation.
If you want my hypothesis, the Roman civil year never started in March. But March would have had some amount of primacy, as it indicates the start of the planting year. Shenanigans in the calendar would have occurred in February to ensure that the equinox is properly timed to happen in March. But the civil year would have started closer to the beginning of winter for other reasons (perhaps taxation? but finding this level of granularity of information on Roman taxation is difficult).
In this hypothesis, the month names were not incorrect because they were never intended to count from the beginning of the year. Note that the first 6 months of the civil year have names, while the last 6 are merely numbered. It makes no sense to me that you'd make up special names for the first 4 and the last 2 months of the year, while skipping everything in the middle.
Svip · 3 years ago
Isn't it also about as likely that the aliens will have an even more convoluted calendar, and may even consider ours simple?
adventured · 3 years ago
I'm always amused by the fantasy that aliens are more likely to be rational and have far less convoluted systems than we do.
It's some manner of borderline religious, faith-based notion about the assumed nature of aliens. People seem to get quite upset if you intrude on their fantasy about what aliens must surely be like (not like us, far better than us; humans are the primitive dredge of the universe basically). Despite the fact that there's no evidence to support either side of the premise, so it ends up revealing what the person thinks about themselves (self-hate) and humanity generally more than anything else.
And if you really want to see their heads explode, suggest the notion that the odds - as far as we know - are just as good that humans are the most advanced beings in the universe as not; and the odds are just as good that we're the very first spacefaring beings in the universe rather than the zillionth.
rocqua · 3 years ago
There is one defining difference between us, and aliens that visit earth.
They managed interstellar travel, we did not. That inherently puts them at an advantage to us. Definitely a technological advantage. Hence it makes sense to assume (with medium confidence) that such aliens will be better at science than us. Assuming that they will therefore be more rational than us is not much of a leap.
Ekaros · 3 years ago
I don't want to actually even imagine what sort of hell an proper interstellar empire timekeeping is. Just ignore different planets having different orbital and rotational characteristic.
Just the basic relativistic effects even with some type of instant transfers would make most communication and so on massively painful mess.
chungy · 3 years ago
At least, we have a well-defined second. Assuming that humans make interstellar travel and/or colonization happen before being visited first, it's not entirely unreasonable that space-borne vessels will maintain the time and calendar system developed on Earth. It's convention, after all (we fudge it _just a bit_ here on Earth, too).
Perhaps extrasolar colonies will have to develop a system that makes sense for whatever planet or moon they settle on, at which point they'd be converting between Earth time and local time for correspondence.
Ekaros · 3 years ago
Problem isn't that second isn't well defined. Just that the rate of seconds passing in well defined way depend on location of observer. We already average bunch of clocks around the globe. But doing the same thing light years from each other...
nyokodo · 3 years ago
> They managed interstellar travel, we did not. That inherently puts them at an advantage to us.
It means some species that is/ was out there has an advantage. The species that actually visits us could be less intelligent than us but just intelligent enough to operate the equipment they dug up.
bombcar · 3 years ago
I mean most people can drive a car but few can build one, and the majority of both groups can drive pretty badly at times.
avgcorrection · 3 years ago
Sure, if “rational” means that you only do that one thing (science/tech) and have no quirks, personality traits, faiths, etc. outside of that.
allenu · 3 years ago
Agreed. This makes me wonder if a purely rational species is something that can even survive evolution. A lot of irrational behaviors we exhibit are likely the result of traits that have helped us survive in the wild.
mrguyorama · 3 years ago
If those traits helped us survive in the wild, they WERE rational. The point being, a fictional species that was able to widely remove once-rational but no longer rational things is the important bit. It's evidence that they have the capability, and either through a "better" society, or an extreme but likely stable authoritarian system that prioritized scientific endeavors like visiting far star systems and meeting the creatures there with no intention to harm, are able to make changes to themselves to make things better.
That is not a feature we share. We only occasionally make things better for all of humanity.
Izkata · 3 years ago
Their engineers perhaps, but what about everyone else?
ecshafer · 3 years ago
This would be better written in a short story format but I digress.
This is precisely the type of thing that would probably happen in almost any society. There are many standards that pop up that are vestiges of one thing or another. The fact we get base 60 from Sumeria but use Base 12 or Base 24 for hours is not a big deal, weird things happen. I doubt any advanced alien would be just so flabbergasted over this. We have multiple cultures all over the world that count differently, so the assumption of base 10, just doesn't really make sense. All standards like time, counting, etc in any culture I think would be this mishmash of legacies from some people's that were dominant at some point that other people's culture imprinted upon that. If anything an alien race would probably be more suspicious if our calendar and time system was some perfect base 10 all through or something of that nature as if the cult of reason had dominated the world after the French Revolution.
Also the historical record of someone named Jesus existing isn't debated by any historical scholar I have ever heard of, just the messianic / prophetic / son of god nature seems to be the rub.
Buttons840 · 3 years ago
Aliens are likely to view 12 or 60 as prettier numbers than 10 or 100. Try writing the multiplication tables in base 12 and you'll see how much nicer they are.
drusepth · 3 years ago
Here's the base 12 multiplication tables: https://math.tools/table/multiplication/base/12
It doesn't look more or less nice to me than the base 10 version. Can you describe what is supposed to make it look nicer, especially to aliens?
GoldenRacer · 3 years ago
In base 10, the times tables for 2 and 5 are easy because they divide 10. If I want 2*7, I know 7/5 is 1 remainder 2 so it's 10+2*2=14. As for 5x7, I know 7/2 is 3 remainder 1 so it's 30+1*5=35.
In base 12, there are similarly easy rules for 2, 3, 4, and 6. Doesn't seem like that great of a trade off but it could be beneficial. That also just comes down to 12 being a "superior highly composite number".
If I personally was allowed to rewrite our number system, I think I'd choose a base that is either a superior highly composite number or a power of 2. So something in the set [2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 32, 60, 64...]. I doubt 10 would even cross my mind as an option if I didn't have 10 fingers.
Buttons840 · 3 years ago
Another layer to this is that numbers one-off the factors have nice patterns too. For base 10 those are (2, to include the factors), 3, 4, (5), 6, and 9 sort-of, since it's one below 10. Just think how awkward 7 and 8 times tables were compared to the rest. With base 12 I found that all numbers, even 7 and 11, end up having usable patterns and are easier to count by. Of course, I'm still not used to having 12 digits, but on paper I could tell they would be pleasant to count by if I had learned base 12.
And an even deeper insight is that it doesn't really matter that much and isn't worth shaking up the whole world to change. We're not going to be better or worse at math because of our number base.
Buttons840 · 3 years ago
You have to fill out the table yourself to appreciate the patterns.
enlyth · 3 years ago
I follow about 80 people on Twitter and Foone usually takes up more than half of my feed :D
EdwardDiego · 3 years ago
Yeah, from what I understand, it's generally accepted that some rabble rouser called Yeshua existed, and later had followers who considered him to be holy.
Maursault · 3 years ago
> Yeah, from what I understand, it's generally accepted that some rabble rouser called Yeshua existed, and later had followers who considered him to be holy.
Except for where you start a sentence with "yeah," apparently answering in the affirmative a hypothetical question that no one has asked, and adding a superfluous and grammatically incorrect comma, you are vaguely correct.
Jesus is the English transliteration of a Germanic adaptation of the Latin transliteration of the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name Yeshua.
What is agreed upon by near universal scholarly consensus is instead that Jesus was baptized and crucified. But I personally believe it is a sure bet he also was a rouser of rabble, had a ministry, and was considered holy, as beyond the 10 or so natural holes he ultimately was given at least 4 additional holes.
EdwardDiego · 3 years ago
> Except for where you start a sentence with "yeah," apparently answering in the affirmative a hypothetical question that no one has asked, and adding a superfluous and grammatically incorrect comma, you are vaguely correct.
Wow, you must be a hit at parties. The way I phrased that sentence is how some some dialects of English, like the one I speak, express agreement. Consider it shorthand for "I agree,". And perhaps consider the limits of your experiences and that wisdom is (partially) knowing what you don't know, and not attempting to speak with authority in such areas.
In wording my response to you, I've deliberately avoided other expressions from my dialect that may confuse you, but are very applicable. Like "twat" or "tosser", or "tu meke".
> Jesus is the English transliteration of a Germanic adaptation of the Latin transliteration of the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name Yeshua.
Yeah, nah. Thanks for contributing nothing that a basic Google of "Jesus Yeshua" wouldn't have.
In my dialect, "yeah, nah" often means "I'm experiencing fremdschämen".
> What is agreed upon by near universal scholarly consensus is instead that Jesus was baptized and crucified.
You're going to need an awful lot of citations there.
Firstly, define the scholars you're referring to.
Also, what sources are they working from?
Josephus, the closest there is to a contemporaneous source, doesn't mention baptism. Neither do Seutonius, Pliny the Younger, Mara bar-Serapion or Tacitus.
Maybe the scholars you refer to are extrapolating from the title "Anointed", or from the fact that, gosh, if you're saying this Jesus is sinless, and baptism is for the remission of sins, then why would you include a story in your holy writings that Jesus was baptised? It makes no sense, so you must've included it to be historically correct! Also known as proof by mortification. [0]
Or maybe, you're just referencing crap you garnered from a 5 minute speed read of Wikipedia that really needs more citations? Who knows? Tu meke au.
anjbe · 3 years ago
> > What is agreed upon by near universal scholarly consensus is instead that Jesus was baptized and crucified.
> You're going to need an awful lot of citations there.
> Firstly, define the scholars you're referring to.
Not being OP, I’ll list at least John Dominic Crossan and James Dunn, who has said that the baptism and crucifixion of Jesus “command almost universal assent.”
Of course, I got those names from five minutes speed reading Wikipedia. But that’s two more scholars’ opinions of the scholarly consensus than you’ve provided.
> Also, what sources are they working from?
Surely this is the very definition of moving the goalposts. OP stated the scholarly consensus is that Jesus’s baptism and crucifixion are true (this, incidentally, was my existing impression of the scholarly consensus). Now you’re no longer just arguing that OP was wrong about that, but have moved on to claiming that any scholars and historians who believe in Jesus’s baptism are wrong because they have no reliable sources.
I have to admit, I’m not inclined to throw out my understanding of the scholarly consensus or which sources are reliable to argue the historicity of Jesus based on an unsourced Hacker News comment.
EdwardDiego · 3 years ago
I chose sources that are either non-Christian, or their subsequent Christian modifications are well identified (i.e., Josephus' Antiquities), because if you're wanting to make a case for the historical Jesus, then it's best to avoid as much bias as is possible.
And I'm very interested indeed in Crossan and Dunn's sources, sadly Wikipedia doesn't yield any light on this.
The historical sources I mentioned can be found in more detail on newadvent.org, whatever else you think of the Catholics, they compile a humdinger of a wiki, and are probably the experts on Christology and the historical Jesus.
Maursault · 3 years ago
> Wow, you must be a hit at parties.
Ad hominem attack.
> The way I phrased that sentence is how some some dialects of English, like the one I speak, express agreement. Consider it shorthand for "I agree,".
There is no English dialect that does not include the adverb, "yeah," etymologically formed from drawling the affirmation, "yes," colloquially and informally. More often, however, "yeah" is employed as a common filler in the same way as, "um," or "uh," used as a pause to think when not finished speaking, as such, when written, it is meaningless and superfluous. In modern usage, however, it may most often be correctly replaced with the phrase, "as a Millennial, I informally affirm."
> And perhaps consider the limits of your experiences and that wisdom is (partially) knowing what you don't know, and not attempting to speak with authority in such areas.
Ad hominem attack.
> In wording my response to you, I've deliberately avoided other expressions from my dialect that may confuse you, but are very applicable. Like "twat" or "tosser", or "tu meke".
Ad hominem attack.
> Yeah, nah. Thanks for contributing nothing that a basic Google of "Jesus Yeshua" wouldn't have.
Contradiction of informal colloquialisms and an ad hominem attack.
> In my dialect, "yeah, nah" often means "I'm experiencing fremdschämen".
False. An affirmative placed with a negative is a contradiction, but the assertion here is a clumsy ad hominem attack.
> You're going to need an awful lot of citations there.
While I agree with anjbe that this is moving the goalposts, it is also an ad hominem attack.
> Firstly, define the scholars you're referring to.
While I have not referred to any particular scholars, making your employment of such a straw man, I would define scholars in the ordinary sense as academics.
> Also, what sources are they working from?
This is further development of the previous straw man.
> Josephus, the closest there is to a contemporaneous source, doesn't mention baptism. Neither do Seutonius, Pliny the Younger, Mara bar-Serapion or Tacitus.
Though this is a continuation of the previous straw man argument, in fact, the closest contemporaneous sources, in chronological order, are the letters of Paul, the Gospel of Mark, the Gospels of Luke and Matthew, Acts of the Apostles, and the Gospel of John.
> Maybe the scholars you refer to are extrapolating from the title "Anointed", or from the fact that, gosh, if you're saying this Jesus is sinless, and baptism is for the remission of sins, then why would you include a story in your holy writings that Jesus was baptised? It makes no sense, so you must've included it to be historically correct! Also known as proof by mortification. Or maybe, you're just referencing crap you garnered from a 5 minute speed read of Wikipedia that really needs more citations? Who knows? Tu meke au.
It its entirety, this is a straw man argument which happens to include ad hominems.
EdwardDiego · 3 years ago
> ...as such, when written, it is meaningless and superfluous. In modern usage, however, it may most often be correctly replaced with the phrase, "as a Millennial, I informally
The distinction between spoken and written seems a) arbitrary and b) entirely irrelevant to a comment section on a website. I'm writing conversationally, comments aren't technical documentation or tenders, they're comments. Observations in passing.
Being honest, when you opened with... ...whatever your thinking there was, I immediately shut down on engagement.
Genuine feedback - you know your shit, so just lead with that, not the part where you decide to lead with "You started a sentence with 'yeah', and that's wrong". It helps establish a rapport.
Anyway, you got your chronology slightly wrong but only slightly, so very much well done, and I mean that genuinely, and it only erred in where you placed Acts, which contains the earliest Christian writings. (That we know of (so far))
Anyhoo, I'm a big fan of this book if you've not read it yet: https://www.amazon.com/Reading-New-Testament-Pheme-Perkins/d...
But I suspect you may have.
Maursault · 3 years ago
> Being honest, when you opened with... ...whatever your thinking there was, I immediately shut down on engagement.
My thinking was the tenor of your comment was overly informal and self-gratifying considering the subject, a major theme of whose teachings was humility. It doesn't quite follow that being antagonistic is not engagement.
> Anyway, you got your chronology slightly wrong but only slightly, so very much well done, and I mean that genuinely, and it only erred in where you placed Acts, which contains the earliest Christian writings. (That we know of (so far))
"The earliest possible date for Luke-Acts is around 62 AD,[citation needed] the time of Paul's imprisonment in Rome, but most scholars date the work to 80–90 AD on the grounds that it uses Mark as a source, looks back on the destruction of Jerusalem, and does not show any awareness of the letters of Paul (which began circulating late in the first century); if it does show awareness of the Pauline epistles, and also of the work of the Jewish historian Josephus, as some believe, then a date in the early 2nd century is possible."[1]
"The Gospel of Mark... is usually dated through the eschatological discourse in Mark 13: most scholars interpret this as pointing to the First Jewish–Roman War (66–74 AD) that would lead to the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD, with the composition of Mark taking place either immediately after the destruction (the majority position) or during the years immediately prior."[2]
"A majority of scholars agree that Galatians was written between the late 40s and early 50s, although some date the original composition to c. 50–60."[3]
"The Epistle to Philemon was composed around AD 57-62 by Paul while in prison at Caesarea Maritima (early date) or more likely from Rome (later date) in conjunction with the composition of Colossians."[4]
"Regardless of the literary unity of the letter, scholars agree that the material that was compiled into the Epistle to the Philippians was originally composed in Greek, sometime during the 50s or early 60s AD."[5]
The earliest surviving subject materials are the authentic Pauline Epistles, and the oldest surviving Gospel is the one attributed to John Mark. It has been theorized and argued that a lost Gospel, a gospel of sayings, known as the Q source,[6] was composed earlier or around the same time as Mark, with the Gospel of Thomas a candidate for the Q source, but most place the date of Thomas' composition after the 2nd Century, and there is no consensus on whether the Q source existed. The earliest recorded words attributed to Jesus are found in Matthew 5-7, portions of the Sermon on the Mount[7] ("Blessed are the cheesemakers...")[8]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acts_of_the_Apostles#Title,_un...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Mark#Authorship,_dat...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistle_to_the_Galatians#Date
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistle_to_Philemon#Compositio...
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistle_to_the_Philippians#Com...
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source
EdwardDiego · 3 years ago
I reiterate my recommendation of that book by Pheme Perkins. Acts contains the oldest Christian traditions. Oral traditions, natch.
Your comments on my tone are bewildering in their absolute irrelevance - discussing the historical Jesus doesn't require reverence or adherence to the themes of Christianity, like how discussing the historical Muhammad doesn't require me to adhere to the shahada, nor consider dogs unclean.
But hey, maybe you're neurodiverse, or maybe you're just an asshole, but you do you.
If your objection to my tone was because of closely held personal beliefs, then I'm afraid you'll just have to build a bridge and get over it.
Maursault · 3 years ago
> Acts contains the oldest Christian traditions. Oral traditions, natch.
The Oral Tradition hypothesis holds that where Matthew and Luke agree against Mark, rather than using a Q Source, the source is oral traditions. Prior to Mark and the letters of Paul, surely there had to be oral traditions passed on for decades. Luke may refer to these in the first two verses of his gospel.
But since the synoptic gospels all attest together to a number of events, known as the Triple Tradition, including Jesus' baptism and crucifixion, and many details in between, and Acts begins with the replacement of Judas with Matthias, detailing further events only after this event, I don't see how the earliest oral traditions could be found in Acts.
Clearly the baptism, temptation, gathering of disciples, etc., all occurred prior to Mathias elected to replace Judas, and if drawn at least partially from oral tradition, how could the later traditions predate the earlier? Without earlier oral traditions including key elements from Jesus' life, how could oral traditions concerning much later events in Acts begin to develop?
Oral traditions detailing the spread of the gospel predating the oral traditions of the gospels themselves is difficult to imagine and implies early Christians developed what necessarily then becomes a backstory, or prequel, namely Jesus' ministry, only after developing the oral traditions concerning the oral transfer of those earlier events. That would be a neat trick, as the narratives about the oral transfer of those chronologically earlier narratives somehow would predate the content of the oral transfer detailed in Acts.
DemocracyFTW2 · 3 years ago
the historical record of someone named Jesus existing isn't debated by any historical scholar
It is debated by people like Richard Carrier https://www.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEB&search_query=richard... who says that (IIRC) while it's not unlikely that one or several people with similar messages preached in Judea 2000 years ago, the Jesus of the Bible looks like a literary invention when you go back to all the earliest records in Christian and non-Christian (e.g. Roman) sources.
*Edit* now that I got downvoted for mentioning Richard Carrier I'd very much like to hear about substantialized criticism about his work. Any pointers?
altthought · 3 years ago
Richard Carrier is an extremely fringe figure regarding the historical Jesus. The overwhelming majority of scholars in the field from conservative to liberal historians dismiss his ideas as fringe, and his methodologies as inconclusive, at best.
wl · 3 years ago
Richard Carrier is a crank who somehow got popular among New Atheists who didn’t know any better. His work enjoys no support in academia.
nyokodo · 3 years ago
> It is debated by people like Richard Carrier
Yes, but there’s little debate amongst scholars that aren’t atheist activists. For instance, it’s extremely difficult to explain the historical facts of the early Christian movement without a historical Jesus due to those events being so recent and broadly falsifiable via living memory let alone records extant at the time and there being no evidence of the Romans using a lack of historical evidence for Jesus as an argument against Christianity.
xani_ · 3 years ago
Uh, they will nuke us the moment they get on facebook
kitd · 3 years ago
The single most complex component I have ever written in about 35 years of SW development was a scheduler to calculate the next instance in a set of overlaid periodic cycles, allowing for time zones, DST changes, leap year/centuries, etc, etc ... in Visual Basic no less!
rvieira · 3 years ago
That's a very funny dialog.
But ... the sexagesimal system made sense and I guess that, in ancient times, time periods that don't have patterns would always be divided arbitrarily (years can be marked with seasons, days with night, but how to divide the time between, say, mid-day and sunset?).
Sunspark · 3 years ago
I suppose they could say stuff like let's meet at shortest shadow or middle shadow, etc. to indicate the feel of when generally you should be there.
haunter · 3 years ago
daedalus2027 · 3 years ago
I saw when i was in Japan a various billboards marking a 25 hour service I thought it was some kind of mistake but apparently they call 1 am the hour 25...I think I saw it in Okinawa
weissbier · 3 years ago
As far as I know, that's actually used, when something starts in the "old" day and continues into the "new" day.
personalityson · 3 years ago
Aliens are taking notes
throwaway290 · 3 years ago
See also May 35th.
PebblesRox · 3 years ago
TIL: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/24/opinion/global/24iht-june...
vsnf · 3 years ago
It’s more than just 25, they often go to 29, to indicate 5am. They do this to make it clear that it is an overnight service starting in one calendar day and terminating in another. It’s not just a simple substitute for “1 am”.
Ekaros · 3 years ago
Actually it is pretty elegant system. Bit strange and extra calculation, but rather elegant option to pick.
Symbiote · 3 years ago
You occasionally see times like 24:15 on European railway timetables. If the train runs only on weekdays, it might make it clearer that there isn't one at 00:15 on Monday.
I haven't noticed 25:00, but I don't often look at printed/PDF timetables nowadays.
edflsafoiewq · 3 years ago
I don't get it.
mod · 3 years ago
I think:
If a coffee shop opens at 5am, they say that. They never say 29.
If a bar stays open UNTIL 5am, they say 29.
bombcar · 3 years ago
Yep, and this makes it clear that they are NOT open Sunday because Saturday closes at 29 and there are no hours listed for Sunday.
renewiltord · 3 years ago
Your flight leaves at 23 and arrives at 26. (11 PM to 2 AM next day)
Your return flight leaves at 2 and arrives at 11. (2 AM to 11 AM that same day)
tomcam · 3 years ago
Surprisingly, I like that as an informal system
Swizec · 3 years ago
Back when I was a night owl, I considered “today” to last until about 5am when you start hearing birds outside. Aligning semantic days with your schedule is incredibly convenient.
Now that I’m a morning person, the same concept of 5am semantic days still works perfectly. The day begins about 20min before my alarm.
layer8 · 3 years ago
Japanese VCRs could be programmed with times like 24/25/26/27:xx, which makes a lot of sense for TV programs that are part of “today’s” schedule but after midnight. Much lower risk of getting the day wrong when programming.
yen223 · 3 years ago
I've seen this when working on a side project involving public transport timetables from Google Transit. A service can run on 26:00 on Sunday, to indicate that the Sunday service is running 2 hours past midnight (i.e. on Monday 02:00).
https://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/reference#stop_ti...
naniwaduni · 3 years ago
Hour 25 is 1 am on the next day, which is 25 hours from midnight of the reference day.
DemocracyFTW2 · 3 years ago
In Japan, clubs will announce opening times like "Friday 22:00〜27:00" meaning 10PM to 3AM the following day
323 · 3 years ago
It's called 30-hour clock.
This convention is also used by some TV ratings measurement organizations - a show ending Tue 02:00 will be recorded as Mon 26:00, since it logically belonged to the day that ended, not the one that started.
moogly · 3 years ago
Indeed, the "tv day" stretches from 02:00:00 to 25:59:59, but you usually don't actually use wall time (or in this case, modified wall time), and instead measure instant time as "minutes after midnight" (MAM) or "seconds after midnight" (SAM), so it's just an integer.
Ekaros · 3 years ago
Don't even go to those idiots over there who uses these weird units for measuring temperature, distance, weight and ugh volume...
When we actually have this well designed system where everything fits beautifully together...
kevinmchugh · 3 years ago
Yes, it's very strange that the English measure their weight in stone and pounds and their beer in pints.
EdwardDiego · 3 years ago
In NZ, all legal weights and measures are metric, yet for some stubbornly cultural reason we still tend to discuss height in feet and inches (ladies on dating apps who are discriminating on height will specify that you need to be 6 foot, not 183cm) the weight of a newborn baby in pounds (but only for newborn babies!), and order our beer in pints, which generally means "a large glass of beer somewhere between 400 and 600mL". Also for some reason ordering a "12th" means a "half pint", and I'm really not sure why.
But the good craft beer places have a sign saying what their pints are in millilitres to prevent unpleasant surprises when you were expecting 568mL but got 425mL.
mod · 3 years ago
"Pint" varies in the US as well, when ordering a beer. You're just gonna get whatever glass they have.
They'll probably tell you if they know it's not a true pint, but I expect most bartenders have no idea.
jrmg · 3 years ago
A pint in the USA is 16 fluid ounces. In the UK (in the ‘imperial’ system) it is 20. [Technically the fluid ounce is also different in the two systems, but not enough to matter at this scale.]
Some US bars will serve imperial pints on request and/or offer them for British or Irish beers.
fanf2 · 3 years ago
The difference is about 10% which is easily noticeable.
Typically in a British pub you will be served beer in a glass that is calibrated as “pint to brim”, and any head on the beer is taken out of the nominal pint. So usually a pint as served is much closer to half a litre.
selectodude · 3 years ago
A lot of the shittier bars will have glasses that look like pints but only hold 14oz, 12oz of beer 2oz of foam.
The German system where there's a line on the glass that needs to be reached by beer under penalty of law puts a smile on my face.
kevinmchugh · 3 years ago
The "above six foot" rule seems like it's just a round number, but in the US at least:
* height is normally distributed for men.
* The average height of a man is 5'9".
* The standard deviation for men's height is 3".
So six foot is one standard deviation above average. I am sure one or more of the above does not hold for NZ. I just think this is neat, that the commonly stated preference happens to be for one standard deviation above the average.
avgcorrection · 3 years ago
A neat coincidence only. America consists of lots of ethnicities. Some bring that average up and some bring it down. There’s some preference for intra-ethnicity dating.
avgcorrection · 3 years ago
Imagine if the imperial foot was one centimeter longer. Then men on dating apps would need to be minimum 188cm (because round number).
mcv · 3 years ago
I feel like I need to specify that the Dutch sometimes coloquially also use pounds and ounces, but Dutch pounds are exactly 500 grams and Dutch ounces 100 grams.
fanf2 · 3 years ago
Crikey, that’s a big ounce! Rough rule of thumb is that an egg is about 2oz.
llanowarelves · 3 years ago
The metric "interface" has nice "round" numbers, but the implementation idk:
"In the SI, the standard metre is defined as exactly 1/299,792,458 of the distance that light travels in a second."
"The kilogram was originally defined as the mass of one cubic decimetre of water at 4 °C, standardized as the mass of a man-made artefact of platinum-iridium held in a laboratory in France, which was used until a new definition was introduced in May 2019. Replicas made in 1879 at the time of the artefact's fabrication and distributed to signatories of the Metre Convention serve as de facto standards of mass in those countries. Additional replicas have been fabricated since as additional countries have joined the convention. The replicas were subject to periodic validation by comparison to the original, called the IPK. It became apparent that either the IPK or the replicas or both were deteriorating, and are no longer comparable: they had diverged by 50 μg since fabrication, so figuratively, the accuracy of the kilogram was no better than 5 parts in a hundred million or a proportion of 5x10−8:1. The accepted redefinition of SI base units replaced the IPK with an exact definition of the Planck constant, which defines the kilogram in terms of the second and metre."
Ekaros · 3 years ago
So what are the "imperial" Volts and Amperes?
function_seven · 3 years ago
As an unashamed imperial units enthusiast, now I’m sad we don’t have different ones for current and potential.
But at least we still have horsepower! My PSU is a 3/4-horse unit. My toaster oven is a full horsepower.
I like it.
mrguyorama · 3 years ago
Your battery-electric vehicle has a capacity of 70 thousand horsepower-hours
function_seven · 3 years ago
Oh boy I wish. I'd only have to recharge like once a year! That's just nuts.
My 70kWh battery holds only 95 horsepower-hours. But I use the British Thermal Unit when talking about energy.
My BEV has 240 kilo-BTUs stored in it.
russellbeattie · 3 years ago
We should start first be redefining the second: 9,192,631,770 oscillations of a cesium atom. It's too long anyways, we can easily perceive time down to at least 1/60th of that.
So let's call it 150 million oscillations, and refer to it simply as "time", since the word second only makes sense in context of an analog clock anyways. Then we can start rounding the other weights and measures accordingly until everything is nice and clean. It appeals to the OCD in me, despite the societal chaos that would ensure.
But then the universe will undoubtedly throw random numbers at us like π or the fine-structure constant and mess it all up.
12baad4db82 · 3 years ago
Not sure what you are trying to say with your quoted phrases.
There was an issue with the standard for the Kilogram, which was recognised then corrected by introducing a definition which is based on physically measurable phenomenon. The new approach allows independent experiments to derive the value of the Kilogram.
That seems to me like a process that works, and I struggle to think of a better outcome.
chungy · 3 years ago
> Not sure what you are trying to say with your quoted phrases.
That the metric system is just as arbitrary as the customary units. Things like the meter and (kilo)gram were based on arbitrary objects rather than anything objective. They've since been redefined using physical constants to come close enough to the old reference objects. (And the US customary units are officially defined as exact fractions from the SI units -- making the whole world happy to have exact measurements regardless of the system you use.)
At least the customary units have nice divisors. Just saying.
dkbrk · 3 years ago
> That the metric system is just as arbitrary as the customary units
No-one claims it isn't arbitrary. Any choice of units is arbitrary. "Not being arbitrary" just isn't a desideratum when considering what makes a good system of units.
The main desirable property is coherence [0], which SI has.
But I don't think anyone would claim SI is perfect. It's not; it's got at least a couple of warts. One is that "kg" is a base unit and is prefixed. But that's about the worst of it.
CGS is also coherent, but has a similar problem with a prefixed base unit (in this case, cm).
US Customary units is not only incoherent, but does things like conflate mass and force (lb is a technically a measure of force, so is the long/short ton, and slug is the proper unit for mass) and has far too many derived units that measure the same thing (e.g. ft lb/s, hp and BTU/h, vs just W).
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherence_(units_of_measuremen...
fanf2 · 3 years ago
The metric system was based on the existing unit of time and the dimensions of the earth. The metre was originally defined as 1/40,000,000 of the circumference of the earth (through the poles and Paris). From the metre they derived units of weight and volume.
There was some debate at the time about using a pendulum with a 1s period to define the metre, but it was known to be less accurately reproducible than the geodetic version.
Their aim was to define a system that could in principle be recreated from scratch anywhere on Earth without necessarily relying on access to the physical prototypes. In practice the relative imprecision of the original measurements compared to the later demands of science and engineering meant that the prototypes became the definition.
It’s interesting to compare with the British Imperial units reform in the 1820s. Part of that act specifies how to recreate the prototypes from physical properties of the units. When the Palace of Westminster burned down in the 1830s the ancient prototypes were destroyed. But the replacements were recreated from copies, not from the specification in the act. And not much later, the official definition was based on the metric system because the metric standards were manufactured to much greater quality.
JoeAltmaier · 3 years ago
Two pints in a quart! Two quarts in a 'pottle'! Two pottles in a gallon!
Except nobody remembers what a 'pottle' is.
genewitch · 3 years ago
pottle? What about the hay-gallon?
timbit42 · 3 years ago
Yeah. Who thought using decimal was a good idea? We should be using dozenal. At least 12 is divisible by 2, 3, 4 and 6, while 10 is only divisible by 2 and 5 so doing thirds and quarters is messy. Being able to do fifths isn't as useful as thirds and quarters and you can multiply 12 by 5 and use 60 if you want to divide by fifths, like clocks do.
int_19h · 3 years ago
Decimal is a natural convention once you're using fingers to count, which humans usually do while they're figuring it all out.
pessimizer · 3 years ago
As most of us have successfully figured out counting, we can move on to measurement systems that are more convenient when dividing.
int_19h · 3 years ago
We're too invested into decimal at this point - the cost of the migration would be so immense as to dwarf any benefits from suddenly being able to divide by 3 and 4 easily.
Joeri · 3 years ago
Not true. You can count knuckles on one hand up to 12, two hands up to 144, or 60 if you’re using fingers of one hand and knuckles of the other. Societies used to count knuckles, which is why duodecimal systems were a lot more popular back then. Way easier for doing fractions and divisions in your head as well.
Decimal is a system best suited for written math.
int_19h · 3 years ago
You can count all kinds of things, but of the pieces of human anatomy, fingers are the most convenient because you can fold them while counting. Which is why they're also by far the most popular things to count worldwide, even if different societies use slightly different ways of doing so.
You can count to 12 that way, too, e.g. by folding the thumb first to indicate 1, and then unfolding it with the rest of the fingers folded when you get to 6. Or you can turn the fist upside down etc. Again, there are many techniques, but counting by folding or unfolding fingers is the simplest and the most obvious, which is why base-10 is the most common.
int_19h · 3 years ago
Designing a well-fitting system of units is not hard given all the experience we have already. Units of time are the trickiest due to natural cycles, but there are ways to minimize the irregularity.
The problem is getting that design adopted by everyone.
jonathanlydall · 3 years ago
“And once a year we have a 23 hour day and half a year later we have 25 hour day, but not all of us.”
breck · 3 years ago
before we get through "daylight savings time" they will just step on us
russdill · 3 years ago
Not looking forward to telling them that we named our home planet planet dirt
ratsmack · 3 years ago
"The Origin Of The Word 'Earth' is an English/German name which simply means the ground. It comes from the Old English words ‘eor(th)e’ and ‘ertha’ ."
anjbe · 3 years ago
There’s a good exchange in the classic video game Star Control 2 (now open source, available in most package managers as “uqm”), when the player encounters a species of plant‐like alien:
>> I am Captain Zelnick from Earth. We come in peace.
> I am Captain Ala‐la’la. We come in peace.
>> Our starship is called Vindicator.
> Our starship is called the Tender Shoot.
>> We are the New Alliance of Free Stars from Earth.
> We are the Supox Utricularia from Earth.
>> You’re from Earth??? Hey! Are you just copying whatever I say?
> Oh yes, we apologize for the confusion, our homeworld is also called ‘Earth’, or more properly ‘Vlik’, which means ‘Perfectly Good and Nutritious Dirt’. ‘Earth’ is pretty close, is it not?
chaps · 3 years ago
A good way to know whether a month has 31 days is by counting the knuckles and gaps between knuckles. "Landing" on a knuckle means that month is 31 days. So,
Pointer finger knuckle = January = 31 days
Between pointer/middle = Feb != 31 days
Middle finger knuckle = March = 31 days
And so on, just looping back to the first knuckle when you get past the pinky knuckle.
xenocratus · 3 years ago
I feel like the poor (probably knuckleless) alien would definitely be sobbing at that :)
davchana · 3 years ago
Pinky knuckle is July 31 days, & conveniently next knuckle is index finger August, again 31 days :)
dragontamer · 3 years ago
October, for Octogon, meaning the 8th month, is the 10th month.
And Dec for 10 meaning December is the 12th Month. Going by the Roman system, March is the 1st month bu we've decided to make it the 3rd month today and offset everything else.
mro_name · 3 years ago
septem, octo, novem, decimus is latin for the numbers 7, 8, 9, 10.
drexlspivey · 3 years ago
epta, octo, ennea, deca is greek for 7, 8, 9, 10
dspillett · 3 years ago
Reminds me of Dave Allen's sketch about teaching kids to tell the time:
“and the third hand is the second hand…”
----
update: found it: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=0QVPUIRGthI
dave4420 · 3 years ago
At least New Year’s Day no longer falls on 25th March.
hutzlibu · 3 years ago
Depends, in the northern hemisphere this would be when spring is starting, so when the whole nature comes to life full power. Might be more appropriate, as a start of a new year, instead of choosing the time when the cold starts..
dave4420 · 3 years ago
If New Year’s Day was still 25th March, that Twitter thread would have complained about the year starting partway through a month.
March 1st would make sense in terms of Sep/Oct/Nov/Dec having the right names for their place in the year.
furyofantares · 3 years ago
This actually made me feel very much better about all the weirdness. Seeing it all in one place made it look clearly inevitable and also made it clear how little of a problem any of it is.
naniwaduni · 3 years ago
For what it's worth, leap day is at the "end" of a year. It's just a year that starts in March—an assumption shared with several other odd properties of this calendar.
wongarsu · 3 years ago
This is why September, October, November and December are named after the numbers 7, 8, 9 and 10: they are the 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th month if you start the year in March, like we used to.
pjerem · 3 years ago
wow.
vlunkr · 3 years ago
The author mentions this as well. I don’t know how I’ve never connected those dots.
BuyMyBitcoins · 3 years ago
There’s no going back. I routinely mess up 8 with October now.
dontlaugh · 3 years ago
That happens especially if you speak a Latin language. Very annoying.
genewitch · 3 years ago
I always assumed that it made sense until july and august were added, which is how i explain it to children. This thread has mentioned several times that those were quintillis and sextillis or something prior. I still like my version better, it implies that emperors are egotistical.
colechristensen · 3 years ago
Evidence for this is September October November and December are named as seventh eighth ninth and tenth months which matches with a year starting in March obviously intentionally at the spring equinox but calendar inaccuracies lost that.
Quarters should begin and end with equinoxes and solstices and be equivalent with seasons, major holidays aligned with quarter transitions and solar milestones make sense.
kevinmchugh · 3 years ago
Dates are one of the first standards through which humans discovered https://xkcd.com/927/.
Standards simple and useful enough to be used in everyday conversation die with their users. So I don't know anyone who keeps track of the Republican calendar, but I _do_ know people who are celebrating New Year's tonight. And the English still drink beer in pints.
It would only be simpler to use the Republican Calendar in a vacuum. Practically, all us programmers would spend all our time converting dates between Georgian and Republican dates, and I'd have to look at my ID to know my birthdate.
Macha · 3 years ago
Who celebrates new year's day on September 25th?
kevinmchugh · 3 years ago
Jewish people celebrate New Year's Day on the first of Tishrei - which is tomorrow
bluecalm · 3 years ago
I always thought it would make sense to have 52 weeks (364 days) and then a special New Years day and then repeat 52 weeks.
This way every year is the same. It's always the same day of the week on April's 13th. No moving holidays. Easier to plan. No adjusting schedules. No problem with leap seconds/days (just as them to the special day whenever).
It just seems like a simple and superior solution. What were those guys thinking...
timbit42 · 3 years ago
How about three 90 day quarters comprised of three 30 day months and one day in between each quarter for each solstice and equinox day? You can add a day or a week periodically to keep it synced.
function_seven · 3 years ago
I’ve always loved that idea. So did Kodak
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Fixed_Calendar
bluecalm · 3 years ago
It's a bit different though. I think the are reasons for 12 months, 7 days per week, 3 months quarters etc. My version keeps it all and avoids points in "disadvantages" section of the Wikipedia article.
int_19h · 3 years ago
There's no strong reason for 12 months.
7 days per week seems to be so ubiquitous now because religions that depended on that particular cycle (Judaism originally, and from thence Christianity and Islam) are so popular. But, historically, societies have successfully existed with weeks ranging anywhere from 5 to 10 days. Romans, in particular, had an 8-day week for most of their history.
(7 days per week has a more natural meaning if your calendar is lunar overall, so that weeks can be aligned with months. But lunar calendars are overall very messy due to disagreements with the solar cycle, so it's best to not go there in the first place.)
bombcar · 3 years ago
Tolkien’s Hobbit calendar did just that - which had the good or bad effect of your birthday always being on the same weekday. Which could be annoying.
thrwyoilarticle · 3 years ago
>"YOUR CALENDAR IS BASED ON A RELIGIOUS LEADER THAT NOT EVERYONE BELIEVES IN?"
Instead of taking the opportunity to make a holier-than-thou twitter rant the would-be probee would do better to reply to this by explaining that almost every religion and many cultures have one or more of their own.
throwaway290 · 3 years ago
Yes, and for some theirs is the main one. It's now year 2565 BE in Thailand, you won't really see "2022" that much outside of strictly tourist-oriented references. Use a Thai VPN when googling and that's the date you will see in search result listings.
I believe the next version of ISO 8601 is expected to support different calendar & time systems.
fdghsjakjhflds · 3 years ago
> you won't really see "2022" that much outside of strictly tourist-oriented references
Both are used. While government orgs are likely to favor the Buddhist calendar, many businesses will use Gregorian. It's definitely not an artifact of tourism.
To wit: When are the most fireworks set off? Your choices are 'global' new year, Thai new year and Chinese new year.
I would guess 100% of Thai people (at least those living in Thailand) know what year it is in both calendars.
Use DDG and you won't be forced to use the locale / language Google has deemed appropriate for your IP address.
throwaway290 · 3 years ago
Sure. The majority of the time it's not the western year IME. Fireworks, depends where you live I guess. I haven't seen many at all.
ketanmaheshwari · 3 years ago
What is wrong with saying everything is an approximation and is made as a means for convenience that is not supposed to be perfect.
nurettin · 3 years ago
I think the point of the article is to look at things from am engineering/scientist perspective where saying such things would get you fired/scrutinized.
renewiltord · 3 years ago
Oh that works for humans. But if you tell an alien that they just block you from transmitting on any frequency of EM. Cultural quirk of aliens.
ozim · 3 years ago
Consistency is for small minds. I expect aliens to have much broader issues with time keeping.
Rotations of different galaxies? Weird alien rulers imposing their names like "X Æ A-12" for 3rd rotation even if 12 is in the name.
Having video calls scheduling is hard between Earth time zones - good luck scheduling video call between two galaxies.
eastbound · 3 years ago
The lag would be enormous between galaxies, unless we invent quantum entanglement, in which case the lag is also irrelevant because you can teleport yourself.
dalys · 3 years ago
Teleporting would still require energy and therefor money. Plus wearing pants. So I think the biggest problem is coming up with: A) A network protocol for quantum entaglement. B) porting the Zoom client to the Yapple N1 architecture, the most recent Alien Processing Unit from the company Yapple, named by the popular yapple fruit on the planet Mostly Sand. (Yes, they also named their planet after the material that was under their feet, which they regret after joining the United Planets) Yapple recently used 1.2% of the company’s cash reserves to buy up their only competitor’s architectual IP, their workforce, factories, land, workers, workers families, cities, countries, planets, solar systems and galaxies. So luckily for Zoom developers, there is only one port to be done.
ozim · 3 years ago
Remember that for last 20 or so years we try to move to IPv6 first we have to finish that before we go any further :)
drdeca · 3 years ago
Quantum entanglement does not allow you to communicate information faster than c (though it does allow you to correlate behavior, in a way which the benefits of which can't be seen until after a light-speed delay)
dathinab · 3 years ago
The bigger the problems you have to handle at scale the more annoying are small, fully unnecessary inconsistencies in the peaces which compose the system in which your problems exist.
Big things have failed due to small overlooked inconsistencies in handling date times.
tomcam · 3 years ago
It’s a near tie between the anal probe and explaining our calendar
dang · 3 years ago
tomcam · 3 years ago
All right I’m gonna go with Calendar after all
tomcam · 3 years ago
I miss those guys
croes · 3 years ago
I'll bet the aliens have something similar that is based on historical changes and habits and isn't purely logical.
fsflover · 3 years ago
Unless they redesigned it for their own benefit.
amelius · 3 years ago
And they'll force it upon us.
octobus2021 · 3 years ago
This is absolutely hilarious, and despite being long form, fits Twitter format very well, with each chunk funnier than the last :)
A few notes:
- Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
- US (and maybe one or two English-speaking countries) are the only ones using 12h time, the rest of the world uses 24hrs, however 12h _sometimes_ is used conversationally;
- May be the author got tired (or whatever he took started to wear off) but I consider omitting the whole DST thing a major missed opportunity. :)
Also, for those interested, look up Swatch time invented in late 90s and touted as more logical replacement of the mess that we have. I believe they still maintain some Internet presence but mostly gave up on promoting it. Good luck breaking 1000+yo habits.
edflsafoiewq · 3 years ago
In Hebrew the weekdays are named "First", "Second", etc. making "Shabbat" ie Saturday, the last day of the week.
walrus01 · 3 years ago
This is along the same general idea as the Persian/Farsi day names, you've got Jummah which is the western Friday (Islamic day of rest), then the rest of the days are named shanbe, yakshanbe, doshanbe, sehshanbe, and so on.
shanbe = day (first day of the week after Jummah)
yak = one
do = two
seh = three
Literally just day one, day two, day three.
You count upwards in day number until you reach six, then it's Jummah again and it resets.
The city of Dushanbe, Tajikistan being part of the historical extent of the Persian empire and language is literally just named second day.
Cyph0n · 3 years ago
The same roughly applies to Arabic: Sunday (derived from one) to Thursday (derived from five).
The word for Friday seems to be derived from “gathering” (probably due to weekly Islamic mass) and Saturday seems to derived from “sleep” (?).
_glass · 3 years ago
- Sunday is the first day of the week (even by name, literally the first day) in Israel/Hebrew.
- In Germany we use the 12h format in day to day conversation
- Swatch time was so cool when I was a teenager
googlryas · 3 years ago
I'd love to hear the logic of why Monday should be the first day of the week.
988747 · 3 years ago
Well, since Saturday and Sunday are called "weekEND", so it logically follows that Monday is a "week start". Most people think about it like this: Monday is a start of a new work-week, and then you get two days of rest at the end of the week.
ethanbond · 3 years ago
But there are two ends of any line, one on each side. Not two ends, both of which are on the same side.
layer8 · 3 years ago
In a ring buffer, you have a start and an end pointer, not two end pointers.
adhesive_wombat · 3 years ago
If we think of it like iterators in C++, though, begin() is Monday, and end() is the next Monday.
Quekid5 · 3 years ago
One-past-the-end is the way.
layer8 · 3 years ago
If Saturday is weekend, then Sunday is one-past-the-end. ;)
bombcar · 3 years ago
Exactly. A sausage has two ends, the beginning end and the end end, and so shall the week
int_19h · 3 years ago
Then it'd be called "weekends", not "weekend".
bombcar · 3 years ago
We don’t call it “nights” even though one is split over two days (before midnight and after).
int_19h · 3 years ago
Just call it "evening" if it's before midnight. That way you get four nicely subdivided periods.
00-06 - night
06-12 - morning
12-18 - afternoon
18-24 - evening
Would need to refactor the name of "midnight" tho to minimize confusion. But if we use it as a starting point to count hours in a day from, it doesn't make sense to simultaneously designate it as a middle of anything.
(BTW, such subdivision is actually common in many places of the world.)
Quekid5 · 3 years ago
I feel we've just rediscovered why appeals to grammar[0] don't actually solve much of anything. (Not saying you're appealing to grammar, just that grammar is generally not that useful for discerning... anything really.)
Anyway, to be a bit more substantive: What really baked my noodle when I was younger is the fact that the seasons and the night/day cycle are much more disconnected than it appears when you live on Earth. Of course, it makes sense when you understand the tilt/rotation thing, but still... it really weirds me out sometimes.
[0] English in this case, but any language, really.
remram · 3 years ago
That only applies to things that are not obviously oriented. No one would try to argue that when they said "we'll do a recap at the end of meetings", what they meant is both the start and the end. This is not ambiguous at all and I don't even believe you believe in this argument.
ethanbond · 3 years ago
Well I’d suggest the “obvious” orientation is actually the effect of what you believe the words to mean, not the cause.
This is what I was taught, I do indeed think it’s pretty silly, but it wouldn’t even be in the top 100 weirdest things about our language/culture/norms “space.” We’re surrounded by idiosyncrasies!
gmac · 3 years ago
Because Saturday and Sunday are the weekend.
timbit42 · 3 years ago
Correct. Sunday is the starting end of the week and Saturday is then stopping end of the week.
ghosty141 · 3 years ago
Or you just say, Sunday is the end of the week and Monday that start of the next one. Funnily enough this is the first time I've heard as Sunday as the first day of the week. I'm from Germany where Monday is the first day and Sunday the last.
This also coincides with the work week where the first workday is Monday, then the weekend ends the week and a new week begins with Monday.
timbit42 · 3 years ago
Well, most people say Saturday is the weekend.
thedrexster · 3 years ago
Because Saturday and Sunday are the weekEND.
edit: lol, too slow
kklisura · 3 years ago
I'd love to hear the logic of why Monday should NOT be the first day of the week.
ethanbond · 3 years ago
Because weekENDs. There are two ends, one at the beginning (Sunday) and one at the end (Saturday).
worldsayshi · 3 years ago
I have never heard anyone say "have a nice weekends".
layer8 · 3 years ago
Because then the middle of the week is Thursday instead of Wednesday. ;)
kuroikyu · 3 years ago
Easy to solve: Thursday is the middle of the week, Wednesday is the middle of the workweek.
TheBrokenRail · 3 years ago
Silly reason, but I like that Sunday being the first day keeps the week symmetric. You have the first and last day of the week being days off (in most places), and you have Wednesday in the middle. It's not very logical, but neither is any part of our calendar system.
mcv · 3 years ago
Historical reasons. Sunday has always been the first day of the week. Because yet another religion than the 4 mentioned before explicitly defines Saturday as the last day of the week, and everybody has always gone along with that. Probably because it was always like that anyway.
The recent official standardisation of Monday to be the first day of the week was a mistake.
dageshi · 3 years ago
Mostly because Saturday and Sunday are collectively known as the weekend and it doesn't make a lot of sense to start the week in the middle of what everyone agrees is the end of the week.
merlincorey · 3 years ago
Every end is a new beginning, according to an old aphorism.
This would imply that a Weekend and a Weekbegin could easily coincide.
adhesive_wombat · 3 years ago
> everyone agrees
Not everyone, Israel has has Friday and Saturday off.
eps · 3 years ago
Is Sunday a work day in Israel?
adhesive_wombat · 3 years ago
Usually, yes.
mcv · 3 years ago
I think it's a bit naive to expect sense from anything related to dates and times at this point. It's all just accumulated history, and historically, Sunday has always been the first day of the week, no matter what people today think about it.
CogitoCogito · 3 years ago
It’s totally arbitrary (as well as totally immaterial) whether the week starts on Sunday or Monday (or any other day for that matter). The fact that the US does it differently than many other countries really isn’t a big deal. Your downvotes show the whole bike shedding nature of the issue. The debate is so contentious because the stakes are so low.
octobus2021 · 3 years ago
I'm honestly not sure what "bike shedding" is but numerical values for days of the week very much count when building any software containing calendars (or any dates really) to make sure it works properly in different geographic regions.
jameshart · 3 years ago
Congratulations! You are one of today’s lucky 10,000
http://web.archive.org/web/20190604142831/http://www.unixgui...
throwaway06421 · 3 years ago
What I find interesting is that many Americans consider themselves Christians and that will influence their decisions. So one argument can be made from that point of view (I'm not religious myself).
In the Bible it says God designated the last day of the week as a day of rest. From a Christian point of view, it would make sense that Sunday is the last day of the week, as it is the official day of rest. Otherwise they disrespect the Bible and skip the "real" day of rest.
I'm not religious or American, so from my relatively objective view it seems as if the people from the majority religion has ignored their holy book.
dwighttk · 3 years ago
If you’re interested… the reason Christians worship on Sunday is because Jesus was raised from the dead on the first day of the week. It wasn’t an immediate thing as at first almost all Christians were Jewish and continued the seventh day day of rest and gathering for worship.
mcv · 3 years ago
This misunderstanding is probably where the idea that Monday is the first day of the week came from. Biblically, Saturday is the Sabbath, the last day of the week. But early Christians came together before and after work on the first day of the week, the day Jesus rose from the dead, which is explicitly the day after tue Sabbath. Eventually that day was also made a free day amd added to the weekend. But it was always the first day of the week until ISO redefined it.
mcv · 3 years ago
No, the biblical day of rest is the Sabbath, the Saturday. The fact that most Christians keep the first day of the week instead of the last day is because Jesus rose from death on the first day of the week.
SamBam · 3 years ago
Yet the word "Sabbath" refers to different things to different Christians.
Consider the old nursery rhyme, Monday's Child, which ends with
Friday's child is loving and giving / Saturday's child works hard for a living. / And the child born on the Sabbath day Is bonny and blithe, good and gay.
mcv · 3 years ago
I'm not familiar with that nursery rhyme, but it sounds like it's based on the same misunderstanding that lead to ISO 8601.
anjbe · 3 years ago
I’m actually really interested in this. Clearly in Jesus’s time the Hebrew week went Sunday–Saturday. That definition remained at least for long enough to make into Ecclesiastical Latin and further into, e.g., Portuguese (segunda-feira, etc.). So why does ISO 8601 go Monday–Sunday? Was it codifying existing practice in Europe? When did that practice begin? Was America colonized before Europe switched to Monday–Sunday, or is America’s Sunday–Saturday a fundamentalist reversion to something more Biblically accurate?
mcv · 3 years ago
I live in Europe and I never learned anything other than that Sunday is the first day of the week. It's only very recently that I'm starting to notice an insistence that Monday is the first day. From my perspective, ISO 8601 seems to be the cause of that, and having an ISO standard on your side is certainly strengthening that position, but I think it's simply wrong.
Of course ISO 8601 didn't just drop out of thin air, but what caused it? I think it's a misunderstanding mixed with ignorance. Ignorance of the fact that the Jewish Sabbath, referred to everywhere in the Bible, is on Saturday, combined with people reading in the Ten Commandments about observing the Sabbath on the last day of the week and associating that with their own church attendance on Sunday, which they then conclude must be the last day of the week.
A more thorough reading of the Bible would have set them straight, as would some knowledge about history or other religions.
I actually used to think that Monday as the first day of the week was just a corporate thing. I first noticed it when I started working and work agendas were surprisingly insistent on starting on Monday. But I figured that was because the weekend is meaningless to the work week, so why not just lump it all together at the end? And then I learned about ISO 8601 and was completely flabbergasted that this was an official standard.
anjbe · 3 years ago
Another commenter posted a source that mentions in passing that ISO 8601 was the result of a 1978 UN declaration that Monday should be the first day of the week. Now I wonder where that came from!
SamBam · 3 years ago
I think it's a bit simplistic to call it a "misunderstanding." There are large swaths of Christianity that refer to Sunday as the Sabbath.
anjbe · 3 years ago
You’re not wrong that “the Sabbath day” has sometimes been used by Christians to refer to Sunday, but the context of this thread is that a comment claimed that calling Sunday the first day of the week is inconsistent with the Bible, and that’s plainly not true.
nulbyte · 3 years ago
> From a Christian point of view, it would make sense that Sunday is the last day of the week, as it is the official day of rest.
Depends on the Christian. If you mean the Puritans, from whom present-day prescriptions (such as no or limited alcohol sales on Sunday) derive, you may be on to something. If you mean the Sabbatarians, no doubt they have an explanation, but I don't know it. If you mean a Seventh-Day Adventist, you'd be wrong, because they still hold to Saturday as the seventh-day and the sabbath. If you mean a Catholic or one from another denomination, the Catholic catechism teaches that Sunday is the fulfillment of the spiritual truth of the Jewish sabbath, and most other denominations understand similarly.
drdeca · 3 years ago
Well, yeah, the Sabbath should be Saturday. That doesn't mean we can't have Sunday be the day we go to church.
adhesive_wombat · 3 years ago
In Chinese, Monday is 星期一 (=1st in week).
And the months are numbered (January = "first month"),
Who are we to argue with the people who have finally gotten an act together to number it properly?[1]
[1]: alright, yes, Sunday is still the odd one out and doesn't have a number.
Yhippa · 3 years ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time
I believe the old Sega Dreamcast used this as its standard time in the menu system. Maybe that was for the online service. I would love to move to something like that permanently. Little ambiguity as to when people could meet across time zones.
octobus2021 · 3 years ago
Yeah, that was the idea, they invented it to make things easier for people around the world communicating over the Internet. They even launched a series of watches which displayed Swatch time. It was so cool, too bad it never took off :(
ISL · 3 years ago
It's not obvious why a new system is needed. UTC, TAI, or unix-time are sufficient.
The primary defect I see in the SIT proposal is that it isn't obviously based on the SI, but rather tied to the Earth. Defining a new unit that is 86.4 seconds long feels troublesome for everyone.
naniwaduni · 3 years ago
Or, more closely, Julian day number.
kybernetikos · 3 years ago
Yeah, I played around with a decimal time: https://kybernetikos.github.io/UIT/ but eventually realised that my seconds, minutes and hour equivalents were just names for some of the decimal places of the Julian day number.
shadowofneptune · 3 years ago
I don't see what makes the second less tied to the Earth than the day. The SI system is for scientific purposes, it doesn't have units important for civil purposes like liters. If you were to completely redefine civil timekeeping (good luck!), the day feels like a better unit to focus on.
pitaj · 3 years ago
Wow, it used decimal time? That was always a bad idea - being indivisible by multiples of 3.
TapamN · 3 years ago
It was only Phantasy Star Online that used Beats.
myth2018 · 3 years ago
> however 12h _sometimes_ is used conversationally;
That happens in Portuguese (brazilian, at least). Digital clocks go through 0-23 hours, but the second half is _sometimes_ named as 1-11 afternoon/night (whatever fits your taste). Hour 0 is never referred to as 12, though: it's always 0 or "half night"
cassianoleal · 3 years ago
> "half night"
Minor nit, but probably important since the equivalent vocabule exists in English: "midnight".
myth2018 · 3 years ago
true that. Thanks
Swizec · 3 years ago
> US (and maybe one or two English-speaking countries) are the only ones using 12h time, the rest of the world uses 24hrs, however 12h _sometimes_ is used conversationally;
Maybe this is because I grew up when analog clocks were common, but it would feel extremely weird to say “15 o’clock” in speech instead of “3pm”. Even though it’s written down as 15.
I think you’re right that younger generations that grew up with digital are more likely to answer “fifteen oh seven” when you ask the time whereas I’d be more likely to read the same time and say “ten past three”
(Slovenian background)
less_less · 3 years ago
> - Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
It's not the only one. In Portuguese, the names of Monday .. Friday are literally "second .. sixth fair [day]", with Saturday and Sunday being "sábado" (sabbath) and "domingo" (lord's day).
I'm not sure which other countries follow the convention, but it's the numbering used in the Bible so I would be surprised if there aren't others.
zakki · 3 years ago
In Indonesia looks like Sunday is taken from Portuguese name with modifications: Domingo - Mingo - Minggu
fortran77 · 3 years ago
Israel (where I spend several months/year) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week. The workweek is Sunday through Thursday.
Weekend is Friday and Saturday. I suspect many Islamic countries are the same way.
octobus2021 · 3 years ago
I had no clue, if the work week is Sunday though Thursday, it makes perfect sense. Learned something new today :)
988747 · 3 years ago
Saudi Arabia used to have Thursday and Friday as weekend. They changed that recently (2013) to Friday and Saturday, because that gives them a bigger overlap with the rest of the world, which is good for business.
retrac · 3 years ago
> Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week
/Officially/ almost everyone has standardized on ISO 8601 where Monday = 1 and Sunday = 7. But unofficially, not really. The week is still popularly understood to start on Sunday in English Canada, and probably some other parts of the English-speaking world.
A quick check of Wikipedia suggests Arabic, Portuguese and Vietnamese, all use number-based systems to name the days of the week, and they are indexed from Sunday = 1. But yes, the other is more common. Most of the Slavic languages, and Chinese, among others, use indexed from Monday = 1.
Then there's Swahili: Saturday = 1 and Friday = 7. Though personally, I believe Sunday is the 0th day of the week.
shakezula · 3 years ago
> Sunday = 1
Animals. Absolutely barbaric.
Everybody knows we should index lists starting at 0. /s
stnikolauswagne · 3 years ago
Time to start a movement to consider saturday the as the beginning of the week!
Dylan16807 · 3 years ago
Well by struct tm, Sunday is 0. And months start at 0. And the day of the month starts at 1!
throwaway2037 · 3 years ago
I remember years ago that Larry Wall said about Perl 5->6 upgrade: "We can fix some broken things." This was an item on his big list.
rieTohgh6 · 3 years ago
I remember seeing API that accepted both 0 and 7 as Sunday.
N19PEDL2 · 3 years ago
crontab uses this approach, for example.
FastEatSlow · 3 years ago
I thought that that in Slavic languages Sunday would be the first day of the week, since the Polish for 'monday' means 'after sunday'.
EDIT: got 'monday' and 'sunday' the wrong way round
torstenvl · 3 years ago
In Russian, Sunday is "Resurrection Day" and Monday is "The Thing concerning Not-Doing being in the Past-Perfective Tense" (po + ne+del + nik)
It looks like Polish is similar except that Sunday is "Not-Doing"
xyzzyz · 3 years ago
In Polish, Sunday is „niedziela”, and Monday is also „poniedziałek”, so it actually makes more sense than in Russian :) I suspect “niedziela” («неделя») was the original, proto-Slavic word for the day of the week, as some variations of it are used for I think all Slavic languages except Russian, who at some point decided to rename it to celebrate Resurrection.
thriftwy · 3 years ago
Not-Doing can be a false alias: the week is nedelya and ponedelnik may thus mean "one going with the week*, i.e. starting it.
Altough I'm not sure since the sibling proto-slavic explanation makes much sense. Fun fact: slavic languages split off in medieval times when the calendar and the week were already thorougly taken care of.
torstenvl · 3 years ago
Only in Russian.
In other Slavic languages it's mostly some form of ty + djen' (Polish tydzien Croatian tjedan Czech týden Belarusian тыдзень Ukrainian тиждень). But see Bulgarian (седмица seven-thing (fem.)).
I suspect (without evidence) that, in Russian, it's referring to Sundays as a way of reckoning weeks.
week:Sunday :: year:summer :: month::moon. Cf. "When I was but 10 summers old", "Many moons ago", etc.
That would fit with the use of the archaic word for Sunday as well.
LudwigNagasena · 3 years ago
Ponedelnik etymologically means the day after the not-doing day. Nowadays the connection is lost because Sunday is no longer called “nedelja”.
jq-r · 3 years ago
Depends ;). In Croatia its still called nedjelja (Sunday) and ponedjeljak (Monday).
dullcrisp · 3 years ago
Hmm, and the week is the not-done-thing?
ivlad · 3 years ago
Etymology is hard, the week “ne-delya” could be understood as something that cannot be divided, “not-divisible”. I am not sure which one is correct.
mszmszmsz · 3 years ago
nope, monday is „after sunday”
FastEatSlow · 3 years ago
Thanks for catching that, I got my English the wrong way round.
ysavir · 3 years ago
> A quick check of Wikipedia suggests Arabic, Portuguese and Vietnamese, all use number-based systems to name the days of the week, and they are indexed from Sunday = 1.
I can confirm that in Hebrew, the name for Sunday translates into "First Day", Monday into "Second Day", etc. Except for Saturday, which is Shabat.
latexr · 3 years ago
In Portuguese, Monday through Friday translates to something like “Second Fair” through “Sixth Fair”¹. Saturday and Sunday aren’t numbered.
¹ “Fair” as in “a gathering of stalls and amusements for public entertainment”.
jaza · 3 years ago
Shabbat (apart from meaning "rest") is also generally accepted as deriving from the Hebrew word for "seven", which is "sheva". And Shabbat is sometimes referred to in Hebrew as "yom shvi-i" ("seventh day").
snotrockets · 3 years ago
Citation needed.
Klein Dictionary gives the etymology of שַׁבָּת as derived from שׁבת (to rest). I also found references suggesting the origin is with the Akkadian šapattum, the 15th of the month, but none related to שׁבע (which originates in Proto-Canaanite).
היּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי (note the definite form!) is how Saturday is referred to in Genesis 2:2-3, without actually having the name שַׁבָּת. There's a some discussion about why שַׁבָּת isn't mentioned there as a name for the day, but regardless, your comment is the first time I read of the etymology of שַׁבָּת deriving from שׁבע.
xnzakg · 3 years ago
Trying to read this on Android (in Materialistic) was fascinating, each line containing a Hebrew (?) word caused some of the words around it to switch places, but the words themselves are fine??
snotrockets · 3 years ago
Unicode TR-9 is a hard beast to tame.
jaza · 3 years ago
I know it's not a reliable source by itself, and it lists no citations for the sentence in question, but FWIW, I based my answer on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabbat#Etymology :
> Other related words are ... to sheva (שֶׁבַע) meaning seven, as Shabbat is the seventh day of the week ...
Gunnerhead · 3 years ago
Similar in Arabic, except Friday is juma and Saturday is sabat.
Cyph0n · 3 years ago
The Arabic/Islamic calendar starts at Sunday because the weekend is Friday and Saturday. In Islam, the weekly congregation (mass equivalent) takes place on Friday around noon.
bradleysmith · 3 years ago
Switched to a browser to comment exactly this.
Growing up in Saudi Arabia, we started our work week on Saturday, with Wednesday being the last day of the work (school for me) week. It took me a long time to transition over to think about Saturday/Sunday as the days off. I still get random pangs of excitement on Wednesday thinking it’s the end of the week if my brain hasn’t warmed up.
I believe this is still the case in the gulf states and I would assume other Islamic countries.
throwaway2037 · 3 years ago
You made me think of Malaysia, Brunei, Indonesia: All are Islamic majority in Southeast Asia. I Googled and look what I found: "Identify the first day of the week based on the locale"
Ref: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=000338932&type=...
The entries for Indonesia don't make sense to me.
gorbypark · 3 years ago
As a English Canadian who works for a company that was bought by an American company and was force switched to Sunday as the first day of the week….what? Maybe we “officially” or legally have Sundays as the first day but my entire life has been Mondays first. Every calendar I’ve had has been that way as well. It still messes with my mind, even four years later, that at work Sunday is the first day of the week.
skipants · 3 years ago
I'm from Winnipeg originally and considered Sunday the first day of the week. Maybe it's regional or cultural?
paines · 3 years ago
It doesn't truly matter or? It's not like you are going to work on sundays. You only realize it with calenders in e.g. Outlook, and long gone TV guides....
Symbiote · 3 years ago
It's a little disorienting on booking sites (hotels etc) when the first day of the week isn't Monday.
I once booked a train on the wrong day because the localisation changed part way through my search. (Fortunately I noticed.)
fknorangesite · 3 years ago
Ah, I disagree: it's disorienting when the first day of the week is on Monday.
Funny how that works, right?
chrisseaton · 3 years ago
What does it even mean to consider Sunday the first day of the week? What does it change?
Ensorceled · 3 years ago
Every. Single. Calendar.
If you’re in Ontario, you’ll rarely see a paper calendar that isn’t SMTWTFS
jeromegv · 3 years ago
Same in Quebec.
Never heard anywhere in canada that don’t have their calendar start on Sunday but I’d be curious to find out otherwise.
Tiktaalik · 3 years ago
Walk into a stationery store in British Columbia and you'll find both options.
Perhaps though that is due to the increasingly globalized world and stationery stores desire to have a lot of varied product from great product makers in Japan, USA and further afield.
I grew up aware that some people considered Sunday the start and others Monday, but didn't seem like there were any real firm rules about it where it mattered. I feel like I saw both being used. I always preferred using Monday as the start of the week.
Edit: Had a quick look at the Vancouver recycling calendar they sent me in the mail: Sunday first.
Ensorceled · 3 years ago
> Walk into a stationery store in British Columbia and you'll find both options.
Yeah, Staples or a high end paper craft store will have both.
But if you go into one of those popup calendar stores, all the calendars will be SMTWTFS.
saiya-jin · 3 years ago
In IT, this mess leaks to places it really shouldn't. I've never permanently lived nor worked in native english place, but the amount of time I've seen somewhere in some web app or work outlook weeks starting on Sundays... its maddening, you easily make mistakes in good faith that can have pretty bad consequences, without realizing them.
I think its airbnb that still shows me calendar starting form Sunday. Not cool when you are looking at all those other sites for flight bookings or car rentals, all of them starting from Monday since they respect your locale, and then you book accommodation by muscle memory (since you re-did the searches numerous times as planning decisions about vacation took place), starting at given field for day of the week, only realizing that its moved by 1 day earlier (or later, not sure now). Good if you find out quickly, bad if on the 'arrival' day and your family have nowhere to sleep and its already dark.
I know that this won't ever be resolved mainly due to big egos of those involved, in same way that there will always be those ridiculous feet and inches and miles and absurd conversions between those, on top of fahrenheit madness. Tells something about maturity of mankind...
stormbrew · 3 years ago
What part of English Canada? In Alberta or Ontario (the parts I've lived in, though I was pretty young when I lived in Ontario) I've literally never seen a calendar with Monday as the first day of the week that I can recall.
bawolff · 3 years ago
I think there is a distinction between what people consider the first day of the week and what is printed on a calendar.
kelnos · 3 years ago
The person originally bringing this up referenced printed calendars always having Monday as the first day of the week, so it seems reasonable to use an observation of printed calendars with Sunday as the start of the week as a rebuttal.
stormbrew · 3 years ago
Yes this, except it's not even a rebuttle, I'm just genuinely curious where this might be someone's experience because it's very at odds with my own.
I don't honestly care much what people consider the beginning of the week, I try to avoid ambiguity in planning as much as I can anyways for other reasons (this Sunday vs next Sunday for eg.) but I have been tripped up by an unexpected Monday-first calendar in a webapp.
refurb · 3 years ago
Really?
If someone says "let's meet the 3rd week of April" and you say "ok, let's do Sunday", do you really mean the Sunday in the 4th calendar row?
bawolff · 3 years ago
Given that the first row is usually the end of the previous month: yes ;)
gorbypark · 3 years ago
British Columbia.
fimdomeio · 3 years ago
Portuguese name weekdays by numbers ex Monday, Segunda-feira (Second Market), but I don't think anyone assumes Sunday as the first day.
And I leave the "market" for someone who still didn't have enough of this rabbit hole.
gerdesj · 3 years ago
That sounds quite sensible. From memory, our (en_GB) weekdays are named like this:
Monday -> Moon day
Tuesday -> Tiw's day (Norse)
Wednesday -> Woden's day (Norse - Odin - chief god, one eye, two ravens)
Thursday -> Thor's day (Norse - god with a massive hammer) Friday -> Freya's day (Norse, rode a chariot drawn by cats)
Saturday -> Saturn's day (Roman, also: Saturnalia is the winter festival that eventually became Christmas)
Sunday -> Sun day
el-salvador · 3 years ago
> That sounds quite sensible. From memory, our (en_GB) weekdays are named like this:
Spanish and English follow a similar day naming convention.
But the god's name needs to be translated from Norse Mitology to Roman Mitology first [1]
Lunes/Monday -> Moon/Luna
Martes/Tuesday -> Tiw/Mars
Miercoles/Wednesday -> Woden/Mercury
Jueves/Thursday -> Thunraz/Jupiter
Viernes/Friday -> Frig/Venus
Sábado/Saturday -> Saturn/Saturno
rodric · 3 years ago
With the exception of Saturday. Tacitus associated the Hebrew sabbath («sábado») with Saturn, but the word for the day itself is not «saturno» as it would be if it were like English.
GolfPopper · 3 years ago
I'd always thought (though I don't have a specific source I can recall), that the seven days of the week was drawn from the seven non-fixed celestial bodies visible ot the naked eye: the Sun, the Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. The planets were frequently associated with and named after deities, so the days of the week also have the names of deities.
IncRnd · 3 years ago
Friday literally means Day of Frigg (Old English), referring to Frigga, the wife of Odin. Yes, Freya is believed to be the same goddess as Frigga, but the day is named after Frigga not Freya.
Accacin · 3 years ago
Thurday would probably be 'Þunor's Day' instead of Thor as it's Old English :)
forinti · 3 years ago
Russian is similar to Portuguese, albeit off by one.
Monday = Segunda (second) = понедельник (start of the week)
Tuesday = Terça (third) = вторник (second)
Wednesday = Quarta (fourth) = среда (middle)
Thursday = Quinta (fifth) = Четверг (fourth)
Friday = Sexta (sixth) = пятница (fifth)
So I guess Russians have no doubt as to when the week starts.
enedil · 3 years ago
Well, in Polish, Monday is poniedziałek, which means "after Sunday" (Sunday is "niedziela") and not "start of the week" and it looks analogous in Russian...
hurflmurfl · 3 years ago
On a side note, it's not 100% clear (to me, at least) that the word for Monday (ponedelnik) means "per week" or anything about the week per se.
In Russian the word for week is "nedelya", so "ponedelnik" does seem to naturally tie into that. But the word for Sunday in Russian is "voskresenie" (literally means resurrection). Notice this! Every religious word used in non-religious context is suspicious!
If we examine Bulgarian, the week is called "sedmica" (sedm == seven). And Sunday is called "nedelya" (I perceive it as "ne delya" === "no work").
Thus, in Bulgarian the word ponedelnik becomes like "the day after Sunday", rather than "the day starting every week".
Now going back to the Sunday resurrection theme, it's obviously of religious origins, so I dare assume that it may have replaced something that was already there (like nedelya). And then I imagine the people still wanted to keep the word around, so they started using it to mean "week" instead of "Sunday".
If so, then it would make sense that ponedelnik just means "post Sunday".
[The above is just a pet theory I haven't spent any time on, so I'm not guaranteeing its legitimacy]
acadapter · 3 years ago
This is correct, "nedelya" (no-work) is the common Slavic word for Sunday. The Russian variant is a more recent invention.
tsimionescu · 3 years ago
Note that this off-by-one is exactly the difference between Jewish/Biblical-based weeks, where the Sabbath is clearly the last day of the week (based on Genesis, the day when God rested), and more "revisionist" Jesus Christy-based weeks, where the day that Christ was resurrected is considered more important than the Sabbath and takes its place as the end of the week.
anjbe · 3 years ago
While the majority of Christians meet on Sunday and consider it the “new” Sabbath or the fulfillment of the Sabbath, in commemoration of Jesus’s resurrection, how does that relate to restructuring the week so Sunday is the last day? The Bible is clear that Jesus was resurrected on the first day of the week, the day after the Sabbath.
Matthew 28:1 (NIV): “After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb.”
Mark 16:1–2 (NIV): “When the Sabbath was over, Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome bought spices so that they might go to anoint Jesus’ body. 2 Very early on the first day of the week, just after sunrise, they were on their way to the tomb…”
Luke 24:1 (NIV): “On the first day of the week, very early in the morning, the women took the spices they had prepared and went to the tomb.”
John 20:1 (NIV): “Early on the first day of the week, while it was still dark, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb…”
tsimionescu · 3 years ago
I believe, though am not sure, that once Christians stopped observing the Jewish Sabbath and instead resting on the Lord's day, it also became natural to consider it the end of their week, instead of the beginning.
anjbe · 3 years ago
Then why does the US, a very young culture compared to Europe, universally consider Sunday the first day of the week? Calling Sunday the seventh day must be a very recent development.
tsimionescu · 3 years ago
The USA was founded and its culture heavily influenced by very deeply religious Protestants. While by the time of the founding of the USA, Sunday was decently well established as the seventh day in both Catholicism and Orthodoxy, most protestants were Bible originalists.
I believe that they resurrected the practice of considering Sunday as the first day of the week, based on the Old Testament tradition. Just like New Earth Creationism is in fact a relatively recent phenomenon driven by a renewed interest in literal interpretations of the Bible, that had long since been superseded in Catholic scholarship.
gampleman · 3 years ago
Actually Orthodoxy is arguably more inclined to treat Sunday as the first day of the week as witnessed by the Greek language.
There are also several patristic writings that conceptualise Sunday as the eighth day of creation, i.e. the resurrection perfecting and completing creation (this also suggests that literal seven day creation wasn’t taken that… er… literally back in the day).
qbrass · 3 years ago
Segunda-feria supposedly comes from Church Latin where it means 'second weekday'.
lvxferre · 3 years ago
> I don't think anyone assumes Sunday as the first day.
That is not up to assumptions, but to conventions and arbitrariness. You find both conventions among Portuguese speakers, but mostly domingo/Sunday as the first day of the week.
A good way to check this is to websearch pictures for "calendário em português", and look for the first column of the calendar. Most will have D/Dom (domingo/Sunday); however a large minority will have S/Seg (segunda-feira/Monday) instead.
>And I leave the "market" for someone who still didn't have enough of this rabbit hole.
It's mostly a fossilised meaning.
Latin "feriae" originally meant holidays, holy days, vacations, and the likes; that's why the clergy¹ chose "feria" for the weekdays, as you'd be praising their god instead of the Pagan gods². However, already in Late Latin, this backformation also meant "fair"³. In Portuguese that second meaning eventually evolved to "street market", likely due to influence of the names of the days of the week - you don't work in domingo/Sunday or sábado/Saturday, but you gotta work and sell stuff in the "dias de feira" (feira days).
1. This clergy intervention was done in Latin. This is visible for the name of Tuesday being terça-feira ← tertia feria instead of *terceira feira (third holy day).
2. The traditional names for Monday to Friday were lues, martes, mércores, joves, vernes. Ecclesiastical interference got rid of the names for Sunday and Saturday early on, but if Portuguese inherited the Roman names they'd be something like "soes" and "sadurnes" respectively.
3. In fact that's where English got the word "fair" from. At least when it comes to those fancy markets/exhibitions/etc.; not to be confused with the homophone "fair" for just, beautiful, etc., as this one is native and unrelated.
marcosdumay · 3 years ago
> but I don't think anyone assumes Sunday as the first day.
You can get any calendar from a Portuguese speaking country to see they do.
madaxe_again · 3 years ago
They absolutely do in Portugal - I’ve been tripped up by “see you next Sunday” when they meant “see you this Sunday”.
stuartd · 3 years ago
> .. considers Sunday to be the first day of the week
How can the first day of the week happen in the middle of the weekend!?!
umanwizard · 3 years ago
The same way all the other illogical things happened: random cultural legacy.
Why would you expect the week start day to be any different?
count · 3 years ago
Both ends of the week are the weekend.
One is the starting weekend, and the other the ending weekend.
hunter2_ · 3 years ago
Right, I (in the US) always figured "end" in the word "weekend" was akin to the two ends of a line segment, the two ends of a bar, etc.
To instead think of "end" in the word "weekend" as the opposite of "start" is to use a completely different definition of the word "end".
I wonder if "weekend" therefore has two definitions, given the split dependency.
glandium · 3 years ago
It feels to me that for "end" to be used as the two ends of the week, it would be weekends (plural), not weekend (singular).
NorwegianDude · 3 years ago
Considering that the word is from the British and the fact that the week ends with Sunday there, that can't be it. It would also be weekends, not weekend if there was multiple ends. The upcoming weekends doesn't mean Saturday and Sunday in the US... It occurs over a time period of at least one whole week into the future...right?
drdeca · 3 years ago
Because the week has two endpoints: the initial day of the week and the final day of the week.
irrational · 3 years ago
Sunday being the first day of the week came long (as in thousands of years) before the weekend was invented (which is a very recent development).
nwallin · 3 years ago
Weekends? Weekends are... the ... ends of the week. When you build a bookshelf, do you do:
<stack of bricks> <book> <book> <book> <book> <book> <stack of bricks>
or do you do:
<book> <book> <book> <book> <book> <stack of bricks> <stack of bricks>
fabatka · 3 years ago
When you want to know how your friend spent the previous Saturday and Sunday, do you ask:
"How was your weekend?"
Or do you ask:
"How were your weekends?"
IncRnd · 3 years ago
When you purchase bookends, you get two, one for each end of the bookshelf.
ClumsyPilot · 3 years ago
A week is not a bookshelf, it's a snake. Does a snake have one end, or does it have two? Does a dog have two tails and two butts?
kemitche · 3 years ago
Weeks are not snakes, either. They're continuous, forever. Do snakes line up mouth to tail forever?
ericpruitt · 3 years ago
When they're stressed or ill, yes:
- https://www.iflscience.com/stressed-out-snake-eats-itself-24...
IncRnd · 3 years ago
A week is not a snake. Each week is discrete and a different week from every other week.
umanwizard · 3 years ago
> The week is still popularly understood to start on Sunday in English Canada
Interesting. How does software (e.g. Google Calendar) display weeks when in en_CA localization?
murderfs · 3 years ago
Most software I can think of lets you configure it independent of the locale.
chrisweekly · 3 years ago
"Sat and Sun constitute the weekEND, right?"
"Of course."
"And Sunday is the 7th day, the day of rest?"
"Yeah, that's what they preach at my church."
"What about your workplace?"
"Everybody knows the standard workweek is Mon-Fri. What's your point?"
"Ok, so we're agreed the weekends include Sunday, your Bible says Sunday is the 7th day, and the workweek starts on Monday."
"Yep."
"So printed calendars and day-planners and calendar software should treat weeks as starting on Monday, right?"
"..."
chungy · 3 years ago
6-day work weeks are still common in agriculture, and the Bible is silent on what the exact weekday the sabbath lands on. Some people really argue that it's supposed to be Saturday, but traditionally Jesus's resurrection is said to have happened on Sunday, so most Christian churches went along with that.
My own personal opinion: it matters not what day you consider to be the sabbath, but it does help when a community agrees on a day and goes along with it. So for me, Sunday it is. (It also doesn't matter how a calendar is printed; it could start on Wednesday for all I care. It'd be weird, but it wouldn't change anything.)
Terretta · 3 years ago
The day of the sun, or the Lord's day, is not the 7th day sabbath, it was declared by the Catholic Church to supersede the Sabbath and celebrate the resurrection instead.
In saying “the Sabbath . . . has been replaced by Sunday” (CCC 2190), the Church does not dismiss the significance of the Sabbath. The Catechism reminds us, “Sunday is expressly distinguished from the Sabbath which it follows chronologically every week” (CCC 2175).
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/the-lords-da...
As for which day is the 7th, you can check with descendants of the good book's authors, still around, and still keeping count. The Jewish faith hasn't lost track.
chungy · 3 years ago
Thanks, that's good info :) I definitely have new things to study and ponder about.
I'm of the Latter-day Saints tradition and we basically use Lord's Day and Sabbath interchangeably, though I'm speaking anecdotally and from casual use. I may very well be using it incorrectly!
kristianbrigman · 3 years ago
IIRC it was very common for early Christians, who were mostly Jews initially, to go to temple on the Sabbath (Saturday) and then have their own meetings on Sunday, as they didn’t consider them separate.
mnw21cam · 3 years ago
I think we can trust the Jews to have kept the Sabbath fairly consistently. The Christians literally changed their reserved day of the week in honour of Jesus' resurrection. Luckily the fact that this was the day after the sabbath is completely unambiguously pinned down in the Bible.
throwawaymaths · 3 years ago
"Sat and Sun constitute the weekEND, right?"
It's called a bookEND only if it's to the right of the row of books. If it's to the left (for books in an RTL language), we call it a bookSTART
IncRnd · 3 years ago
There are two bookends in every matching set - one for each end of the row of books.
Izkata · 3 years ago
We also have "bookends" which go on both sides of the books they support. That's kinda how I see "weekends".
mcv · 3 years ago
The Bible does not say that Sunday is the 7th day. It says that Saturday, the Sabbath, is the 7th day. And that Jesus rose on the day after the Sabbath, which means it was on the first day of the week. And that's the day most Chistians have adopted as their day of worship. (Except Seventh Day Adventists who keep it, as their name suggests, on the 7th day: Saturday.)
If your church preaches differently, they should read their Bible more carefully.
anjbe · 3 years ago
Seventh‐day Adventists are definitely the most prolific Christian keepers of a Saturday sabbath, but they are not totally alone. The next most prominent groups I can think of are Seventh Day Baptists and Messianic Jews. SDAs are in the tens of millions worldwide, Messianics in perhaps the hundreds of thousands, and SDBs under one hundred thousand.
Although they’re fairly distinct traditions, in my experience each places great importance on religious liberty and separation of church and state, because historically all three groups have faced governmental persecution from blue laws. SDAs go so far as to believe Revelation’s mark of the Beast refers to a blue law to come in the future.
Messianics also have been known to face religious persecution in Israel. To the extent Christianity is viewed with mistrust by Judaism due to Christendom’s history of persecuting Jews, Messianic Judaism is further seen as an attempt by Christians to co‐opt or corrupt Jewish practices.
(Another fun fact: Seventh‐day Adventists hyphenate their name, but Seventh Day Baptists don’t.)
Bootvis · 3 years ago
And not event that far, sabbath (Saturday) is determined to be the 7th day of the week at the start of Genesis.
xani_ · 3 years ago
> Then there's Swahili: Saturday = 1 and Friday = 7. Though personally, I believe Sunday is the 0th day of the week.
The cron way, where both 0 and 7 means sunday
nodja · 3 years ago
> A quick check of Wikipedia suggests Arabic, Portuguese and Vietnamese, all use number-based systems to name the days of the week, and they are indexed from Sunday = 1. But yes, the other is more common. Most of the Slavic languages, and Chinese, among others, use indexed from Monday = 1.
For portuguese the name being number based has nothing to do with when the week starts, portugal is historically a very christian country and always had the week end on sundays, "and on the seventh day he rested", in both casual/formal speech and formally with calendars and such, saturday and sunday are always put at the end.
The names being numerical was because that's how the names were named during Holy Week (the week that ends with easter sunday), christians were supposed to rest and not work during that week, so sunday was the first rest day, monday the second rest day, etc. which is what the names mean, some people today think it means fair as in state fair/market, e.g. monday is "segunda-feira" = "second fair", but it actually means something closer to holiday, the modern portuguese word being férias.
The reason it took over was basically because the church said so, the old names were still based on old gods and the new nomenclature was adopted for all weeks instead of being Holy Week exclusive.
I guess if the aliens landed in portugal that would be another thing to add to the thread :)
tsimionescu · 3 years ago
All Christian denominations agree with the Jewish ones: God rested on the seventh day - The Sabbath, or Saturday. Jesus was then resurrected on the day after the Sabbath, the first day of the Jewish week, which became the Lord's Day in many European languages (Domenica, Domingo, Duminică etc). It was quickly understood as a non-working day, a day of religious celebration, but it was still the first day of the week.
Now, since Jesus and his resurrection are much more important in Christianity than the creation of the world, the Sabbath began losing its importance, and so renumbering the week started making sense, but was a contentious religious and political issue for a long time. Of course, having two rest days, and one of them being based on Jewish customs in a quite anti-semitic medieval Europe, played a part as well in wanting to change things.
I'm relatively sure that the Portuguese week day names are based on the original Jewish week.
magnio · 3 years ago
> A quick check of Wikipedia suggests Arabic, Portuguese and Vietnamese, all use number-based systems to name the days of the week, and they are indexed from Sunday = 1.
Vietnamese only numbers the days of the week from Monday to Saturday, with Monday = 2 and Saturday = 7. Sunday has its own name that isn't a number and is always put at the end of the week.
bawolff · 3 years ago
> The week is still popularly understood to start on Sunday in English Canada
As an english canadian (alberta), i have never in my life heard of people considering sunday the first day of the week.
Edit: appearently people are talking what is printed on calendar. I consider that to be a separate thing. If you asked me to list the days of the week in order i would start on monday, which is a totally separate question from the layout of a printed calendar.
retrac · 3 years ago
> which is a totally separate question from the layout of a printed calendar
I have no strong preference on Monday/Sunday, and I don't think either is inherently more logical than the other. However, it would be illogical, whether Sunday or Monday first, to have the 7th and last day of the week, laid out as the first column on the calendar.
kevincox · 3 years ago
I like to have my two weekend days next to each other since they are a fairly discrete chunk of time in my mind and planning.
kelnos · 3 years ago
How would the colloquial understanding of the first day of the week get divorced from what's printed on calendars, though? I feel like one should inform the other, no?
Out of curiosity, if you have a calendar app on your computer, does it start with Sunday or Monday?
fomine3 · 3 years ago
Majority of calendars in Japan are starts from Sunday but IMO now people think week starts from Monday. It's relevant to whether people work (or went to school) on Saturday or not (so two consecutive holidays). Some research shows that old ages (who worked on Saturday) tend to think it starts from Sunday.
Calendars tend to follow traditions, and the difference isn't much matter. Also computer apps are tend to follow the US culture since US dominates the industry.
bawolff · 3 years ago
I would guess that in a globalized world, stuff printed in the united states doesn't always match local culture.
kenneth · 3 years ago
In Chinese the weekdays are also numbered and indexed to Monday: Monday = 星期一 xingqi yi (1), Tuedsay = xingqi er (2), all the way down.
themaninthedark · 3 years ago
Japanese calendars start the week with Sunday as well.
plebianRube · 3 years ago
Sunday is the first day of the week in crontab.
First index in the array, 0.
bombcar · 3 years ago
Sunday is the last day of the week in crontab.
Last index in the array, 7.
plebianRube · 3 years ago
7 also resolves to Sunday, but doesn't take away from the fact that the first index [0] is Sunday.
eastbound · 3 years ago
Yes. It should end with “…and this is the best system we’ve found, because all other ones were ditched for being too complicated.”
dan-robertson · 3 years ago
There was a more significant effort to decimalise time (and the calendar to some extent) after the French Revolution, along with introducing the metric system everywhere. People hated it and they eventually switched back. A bit of related trivia is that France only accepted the Greenwich Meridian on maps/charts on the condition that the international meridian conference (of 1884) also concluded that the convened nations also resolved that decimal time was a good idea and they should work towards it.
narag · 3 years ago
Honestly I didn't find it funny, maybe because it ignores the reasons of the inconsistencies, that by the way are perfectly understandable looking at space.
Months are related to Moon's orbit, weeks to its phases. Months have other gods's names: Janus, Phoebe, Mars, Aphrodite, Maya, Juno... Julius and Augustus were emperors and from that point are just numerals, starting at March. It was associated with Mars because Romans used to go to war in the Spring.
Asimov had an excellent chapter on calendar in his divulgative book The Universe, explaining why it's not so easy to design a regular "logical" calendar.
B1FF_PSUVM · 3 years ago
> Julius and Augustus were emperors and from that point are just numerals, starting at March
It used to be numbers earlier, Quintilis and Sextilis were renamed for them.
Apparently the Romans did not find hard naming even persons - they just went by numbers, as in Secundus, Quintus, Sextus, Septimus, Octavius, etc.
smsm42 · 3 years ago
They didn't have too many personal names in general, IIRC about 20 or so commonly used, including numeric ones (there's even Decimus - I guess they had big families). And looking at how Ceasar is always Julius Ceasar (while his personal name was Gaius) it looks like they didn't use it too much outside of family and close friends. Which kinda makes sense - if you know 10 guys with personal name Gaius, it's not very useful to say just "we're having a party at Gaius' place tonight".
narag · 3 years ago
Augustus' first name was Octavius... now August is the eighth month, full circle.
simonh · 3 years ago
The point of comical absurdities like this is precisely that they appear comical or absurd if you don’t know the reasons for them being the way they are. That doesn’t mean there are no reasons, it’s just that those reasons aren’t necessary or even relevant to appreciating the apparent absurdity.
dwighttk · 3 years ago
Perhaps… but the author presents as if telling the reasons but the reasons are just absurd
drekipus · 3 years ago
Many people going to read this thread and think "yes, everything is completely backwards and nonsensical, I hate all forms of historical traditions and reasoning"
I'm also making a comical absurdity just fyi. Do people like this exist? I don't know
narag · 3 years ago
FWIW, I wasn't trying to explain why it isn't funny, but why I don't find it funny. YMMV.
Nobody needs to know all those annoying details, but once you know, the joke doesn't work so well, at least it didn't for me.
Also I believe that the Moon deserves some respect. It makes nights less scary, inspires whimsical humans and provided a convenient way to measure middle-length periods of time when a precise calendar hadn't been developed... many moons ago.
foobarian · 3 years ago
I find it pretty juvenile. It's like when a rookie dev first faces some production codebase and starts wanting to rewrite everything.
fknorangesite · 3 years ago
Don't bother dissecting the frog; this website is populated mostly by sticks in the mud.
avereveard · 3 years ago
yeah, but one could lead the time explanation with that. the alien sure picked an uninformed chap to learn about time.
glandium · 3 years ago
Also, if you start in March, it suddenly makes sense that leap year adjustments are done in February (and also that it's the shortest month to begin with).
cabaalis · 3 years ago
Chesterton's fence seems to apply here.
marcosdumay · 3 years ago
Hum, no. There is no reason not to change it (except for inertia, what is a better reason than any you will see). It is logical (once you get over the fixation with 60), but none of that logic is a good reason to keep it.
foobarian · 3 years ago
This reminds me of the discussion the other day about how the A_n paper sizes are superior because you can fold them in half to get the next size down. Just like having a more logical calendar - it would be nice but not very useful. The value is in the network effect of everyone using the same system (so kind of like the "inertia" you mentioned).
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
> Months have other gods's names: Janus, Phoebe, Mars, Aphrodite, Maya, Juno...
January, March, and June are named for Janus, Mars, and Juno. February, April, and May are not known to be named for any god, nor is there any particular reason to believe they are.
IncRnd · 3 years ago
> February, April, and May are not known to be named for any god, nor is there any particular reason to believe they are.
May is named after Maia, the goddess who oversees the growth of plants.
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
What makes you say that? According to who?
Compare what Ovid wrote about the name of May:
> You may ask whence I suppose the name of the month of May to be derived. The reason is not quite clearly known to me [because there are too many theories].
[J. G. Frazer's translation for the Loeb series]
That the name honors a Maia is one of three theories he goes on to present, the others being that May is named after the personification of Majesty [maiestas] and that May is named in honor of society's elders [maiores].
bloak · 3 years ago
Oxford English Dictionary says: classical Latin Māius (adjective and, short for Māius mēnsis , noun), probably < the name of a deity cognate with the name of the goddess Māia (see Maia n.) and with magnus great (see magni- comb. form).
For April, on the other hand: classical Latin Aprīlis, use as noun (short for mēnsis Aprīlis month of April) of masculine of Aprīlis of April, of uncertain origin; perhaps < Etruscan.
(Oxford English Dictionary is a great resource. In the UK you can often get free online access through free membership of a public library.)
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
> Oxford English Dictionary is a great resource.
Absolutely true, but difficult to get access from the US without a university affiliation.
However, it isn't obvious that the OED is a better source on the meaning of a classical Latin month name than a classical Roman is. It's certainly possible, but not close to a slam dunk. And the OED is appropriately hesitant to say that it knows the origin of the name.
I'd be curious when the entry was updated, except that I can imagine the entry for "May" being updated for quite a few other reasons than to review the etymology.
(I might as well note that Ovid also presents two theories for the name of June, one that it is named in honor of Juno and one that it is named in honor of either the goddess Youth [Iuventas] or youths [iuvenes] in general, forming a contrast with May. There appears to be no real distinction between honoring Youth or honoring youths, despite the fact that honoring Maiestas and honoring the maiores are explicitly presented as separate theories.
I would say the June-from-Juno theory is on much stronger ground than the May-from-Maia theory simply because Juno is so much more important a god, but that is also open to debate.)
bloak · 3 years ago
> I'd be curious when the entry was updated
Curiosity should be rewarded!
"This entry has been updated (OED Third Edition, March 2001; most recently modified version published online September 2022)."
And there's a link to "Previous version: OED2 (1989)" where the etymology is given as: ... "The etymology of the Latin name is obscure; some ancient writers connected it with the name of the goddess Maia."
(Since you read Ovid probably there's nothing new for you in that!)
ClumsyPilot · 3 years ago
just because something has historical reasons does mean it makes sence today. There is no reason for the Moon to have any place in a modern calendar.
You already have 2 values: year and day, and they do not divide nicely. But they serve a practical purpose in a modern society, so we have to deal with them. The moon does not, but adds a third factor.
jelliclesfarm · 3 years ago
I disagree. Moon is the closest celestial body to earth and we have historically been able to make very accurate observations and calculations based on its orbit and waxing and waning phases.
tshaddox · 3 years ago
I think the point is that our current calendar does have historical roots involving the moon but isn’t actually useful for predicting moon phases, tides, etc. and thus is not in fact an important mechanism for modern calendars.
jelliclesfarm · 3 years ago
The purpose of a calender is to measure and predict the march of time. Ancient calenders used the moon and sun to determine time and seasons.
Modern calenders are designed to determine when people will work and when they will rest. The purpose is entirely different in our time.
Current calender’s historical roots only start from Ptolemaic and early Roman periods when the Romans created a planetary week. But it didn’t gain popularity especially in Western Europe. So they adopted the 6 day Jewish week and one day of the Lord’s day of rest.
Only where there was Roman rule and expansion, the new calender and planetary week was installed. Because the Romans needed to keep track of time to monitor work of their conquered territories.
Everywhere else, it was still the lunar calender/sun rise+set for time keeping and solar calender tracking the sun for seasons.
I hear you. I am just saying ‘modern’ is ‘western’ and the west is using time to clock in and clock out people who work. That’s for why if you are rich and don’t have to work, every day is weekend and every hour can be the proverbial ‘happy hour’.
In our time, calenders and clocks are used to track our obligations and when to file tax returns. I still follow the Indian Vedic lunisolar calender for moon cycles and seasons because it keeps me grounded and sane. I feel connected to the earth and sky.
It takes some effort to compartmentalise time for different purposes, but it gives me comfort and escape from the modern world. I am not disagreeing or trying to discredit the western and modern calender. I am just sharing what works for me and the origins of it from my culture/religion.
ETA: calendar has been misspelt as calender throughout. I think I did it once and for some reason, auto complete keeps using it. I don’t want to search and correct every spelling mistake. So this is a blanket correction.
ClumsyPilot · 3 years ago
I need to know if it's day or night. for obvious reasons. I need to know if its summer or winter for temperature.
When was the last time you planned a holiday for the waning phase of the moon?
genewitch · 3 years ago
That depends, have you heard of Easter?
foobarian · 3 years ago
I plan beach visits based on tides, does that count?
otikik · 3 years ago
But the Moon has no influence in modern everyday life. It did in the past, for scheduling fishing, to attack an enemy tribe when there’s no moon, or to hunt nocturnal animals when there is.
jelliclesfarm · 3 years ago
Moon influences us in three ways: Time, Tide and Light.
We now have apps that inform us. But. If we can read a lunar calendar, we can organise our life around the moon cycles.
There is a reason the word ‘lunatic’ is derived from ‘lunar’. We are mostly made of water. Luna definitely has an effect on our bodies and our moods. Why isn’t it a good thing to understand the ecosystems around us that is time and space..and the ecosystem with us that is mind and body?
otikik · 3 years ago
> We are mostly made of water. Luna definitely has an effect on our bodies and our moods
I accept that the moon has effects in the tides. As for the rest...
I have heard that before, but every time it was by someone who standed to gain something from me believing that - that when Moon is on the 7th House and Jupiter Aligns With Mars then Peace will Guide the Planets and Love Will Steer me to open my wallet and register to this self-help course.
Do you have any reference to a credible source that can prove that the Moon has those other effects you mention? Something like a test with a significant enough number of people involve, and a control group.
> Why isn’t it a good thing to understand the ecosystems around us that is time and space..and the ecosystem with us that is mind and body?
I strive very hard to understand the ecosystems around us (And beyond - from the most distant galaxies to how the atoms and sub-atomic particles make us work how we work). But I use Science for that.
jelliclesfarm · 3 years ago
No, I don’t have the time to search for a credible source about the effect of Moon upon Planet Earth.
However, I am a student of astrology tho’…maybe I can see how your natal Moon will steer you. But I am not sure how much you will appreciate it being invested in Science and all that. Take care.
Dylan16807 · 3 years ago
> Months are related to Moon's orbit, weeks to its phases.
But in a way that doesn't work right.
> Months have other gods's names: Janus, Phoebe, Mars, Aphrodite, Maya, Juno... Julius and Augustus were emperors and from that point are just numerals, starting at March. It was associated with Mars because Romans used to go to war in the Spring.
Yes? That's a mess and that's basically what the tweets said. They didn't mention the emperors but that makes it even messier. I'm not sure what you're arguing there. There's no "perfectly understandable" reason for having some gods some emperors and some wrong numbers.
narag · 3 years ago
But in a way that doesn't work right.
It works great for the purpose that it was used: counting groups of days when regular humans didn't have the luxury of more precise calendars.
The part that doesn't "work right" is that the different natural cycles used to measure time are not multiples of others, so adjustements are always needed. That's why calendar is complex, it was fixed repeatedly until it doesn't drift.
Weeks and months are not kept because we don't know better, but because they're useful units for social reasons.
There's no "perfectly understandable" reason for having some gods some emperors and some wrong numbers.
That's a different part of the comment, addressing the hint that there's a religious reason for the calendar.
There are several eras used by different countries, and the common western calendar has several layers: weekdays seem to be of Sumerian origin, months at least in Latin and other European languages come from Roma and the AD year counting is "Christian" and widely used maybe because the last major useful adjustement was this one:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar
But it seems they didn't bother to change the names of previous layers. If something works, just leave it alone. You may argue that there are more "rational" ways to organize time measurement. I would recommend to read what Asimov had to say on the subject.
Dylan16807 · 3 years ago
> It works great for the purpose that it was used: counting groups of days when regular humans didn't have the luxury of more precise calendars.
If you want a quarter month then have a quarter month.
Having a set of days that pretends to be a quarter month but rapidly falls out of sync is worse than having no quarter month at all.
If you gave any other reason for seven days, I wouldn't say it doesn't work right. But that reason makes the length of the week supremely half-assed.
> But it seems they didn't bother to change the names of previous layers. If something works, just leave it alone. You may argue that there are more "rational" ways to organize time measurement. I would recommend to read what Asimov had to say on the subject.
You're conflating two very different problems when you talk about it like that. Trying to make the units line up is legitimately difficult. Bad naming is not because of legitimate difficulty.
foobarian · 3 years ago
What will you suggest next, to fix the spelling of the English language? I'm all for it! But I don't have high hopes... [1]
narag · 3 years ago
Having a set of days that pretends to be a quarter month but rapidly falls out of sync is worse than having no quarter month at all.
So you want to reform the week, the only time cycle that hasn't been altered in millennia to sync it with... what exactly?
Different groups of time have different goals. Scientific and technical applications only use the second. Years are useful both for agriculture and astronomy. Year subdivisions, weeks and months are useful for legal, social and personal purposes: weekends, holidays, celebrations, birthdays, embarrassing familiar reunions and all that.
They neither have to be in sync with anything, just being useful to track days in a year, nor they need to be mathematically pleasant, any programmers worth their salt will write you a perpetual calendar generator in five minutes.
Dylan16807 · 3 years ago
> So you want to reform the week, the only time cycle that hasn't been altered in millennia to sync it with... what exactly?
No. I don't want to change the week at all. I'm just saying that "the week is 7 days so it's a quarter month" is broken as hell.
happyopossum · 3 years ago
Both of your first points are factually incorrect - I’d have to imagine some bubble-bias involved, but many countries aside from the US use the 12 hour clock and start their calendars on Sunday.
octobus2021 · 3 years ago
I did say "per my knowledge" so my point stands :)
NorwegianDude · 3 years ago
Legit question. What is a weekend in the US? Is a weekend in the US Friday - Saturday?
Most places consider the week to end with Sunday and the weekend is usually considered to be from after work on Friday(or technically Saturday) until Monday starts.
But when an American says "right over the weekend", do they mean Sunday, since the US week starts on Sunday? Or does the week actually start on Monday as in most places?
I'm from this planet, and even I am confused with all of us, but especially with Americans.
sethhochberg · 3 years ago
“Weekend” in the US typically refers to Saturday / Sunday.
Monday through Friday is the workweek.
masklinn · 3 years ago
The american weekend is sat-sun. Work week starts on the second day of the week. Because reasons.
octobus2021 · 3 years ago
That was my point, if the workweek in US is Monday through Friday, and US weekend is Saturday and Sunday, there's NO REASON WHATSOEVER to call Sunday "the first day of the week"...
tolmasky · 3 years ago
The year also starts and ends with winter. The day starts and ends with night. So growing up it seemed to fit that the week would start and end with weekend.
umanwizard · 3 years ago
There’s no reason whatsoever (other than historical) for any of the inconsistencies explored in the tweet thread. Why should the start of the week be any different?
pteraspidomorph · 3 years ago
It's biblical. Saturday is the sabbath, the 7th day rest day, which would make sunday the first day. Later, christians decided to hold mass on sunday instead, because it was when Jesus resurrected. Eventually you end up with saturday and sunday as rest days, even though one is biblically the first and one is biblically the last day of the week. But both are the "weekend".
mcv · 3 years ago
There are many reasons to call Sunday the first say of the week. Mostly historical ones. Weeks have existed for far longer than the US or in fact any modern country has. Or the concept of a 5-day work week, in fact. The Monday as the first day of the week is modern revisionism.
rsynnott · 3 years ago
The five day workweek is a fairly new thing (early to mid 20th century); the day numbering thing is much older.
bsdetector · 3 years ago
Think of it as "weekends" as in the limits of the week not "weekend" as in the last part of the week.
In SMWTTFS the Saturday and Sunday are at the ends as in limits of the week, and furthermore it makes sense for there to be two "weekend" days like there are two bookends. In MWTTFSS Sunday is the only actual end of the week with Saturday being included just because(?) and Monday being "weekbegin", which isn't really a word in English.
So based on this SMWTTFS seems more logical and sensible at least in English.
octobus2021 · 3 years ago
Why would I think of a weekend not as a weekend but as weekendS, which is 2 days, one of which is the end and another is beginning? It's called weekend, as in the end which follows the week. Which therefore starts on Monday and ends on Sunday.
I mean I get it that Sunday being the first day of the week is a leftover from religious past but this does not make it any more logical when applied to the workweek/weekend cadence. Moreover, most of European countries where workweek starts on Monday already consider it the 1st day of the week, why can't US do the same and be done with it?
anjbe · 3 years ago
> Moreover, most of European countries where workweek starts on Monday already consider it the 1st day of the week, why can't US do the same and be done with it?
What benefit would we get from doing so? Metric I can understand the benefits of, though I also see why Americans are resistant implementing such a disruptive change in daily life. But shifting our definition of the week by one day provides no benefit that I can see, nor does keeping it the way it is cause any harm. The primary argument I’ve seen in these threads is “because the word ‘weekend’ doesn’t make sense,” but that’s not very convincing to me since I and every other American I know find the phrasing perfectly natural—and if we want to make the English vocabulary perfectly ‘logical’ and ‘consistent,’ there are far more disturbing malapropisms in common use to tackle first.
Terretta · 3 years ago
No reason other than some 6000-7000 years of record keeping by Hebrews, tracking the 7th day.
jelliclesfarm · 3 years ago
The Hebrew calendar kept changing as they moved and adapted the calendar designed by the ruler of the lands.
Hebrew words for the week came from Akkadian and sabbath itself can be traced back to the Babylonian loan word for fifteen..mistaken as seven. šabattu is the 15th day of the month, the time of the full moon Vs “sebūtu“ was the 7th day of the lunar quarter.
The Akkadians had no concept of ‘week’. They simply followed the moon. Starting with the new moon, first quarter, second quarter and third quarter. Their festivals were based on the 1, 7 etc and 15 day with the 15th day being observed as the bright full moon.
It must have been from the Babylonians that the Hebrews adopted the 7 day week because they had seen them celebrate the 7th day, “sebūtu“. Altho they probably chose the word for the 15th day/full moon of Babylonian šabattu as it’s closer to Hebrew ‘sabbot’ and their word for ‘rest’. Post exile Hebrews took this to create the Hebrew calender and created sabbot as the 7th day of rest.
The Babylonians celebrated 1, 7, 21 and 28th day after new moon as the beginning of each quarter. Hebrews simply took each quarter to be a slice of time instead of differentiating between the four quarters between two new moons.
anjbe · 3 years ago
I’ve seen this theory proposed, but is it actually widely accepted by historians? Wikipedia says that a connection “has been suggested”[0], which doesn’t seem like very strong wording.
jelliclesfarm · 3 years ago
Yes..it was proposed by a linguist, iirc. There is only one 2015 paper where I have read it. But it seems most plausible. Consider this. The Greeks had no calender. Cannanite Hebrews had no Egyptian admixture. So what remains is the sandwich period from where the record keeping must have been directly influenced by the Babylonians.
2rsf · 3 years ago
> Hebrew words for the week came from Akkadian
The days in Hebrew are simply numbered, First day, Second day etc. except for Shabbat
eyelidlessness · 3 years ago
So, the standard US weekend is Saturday–Sunday, even amongst the Sunday=1 holdouts. I say holdouts, because it helps to understand that this isn’t agreed on even within the US. Not to suggest that the holdouts are a minority, I honestly don’t know but I doubt it. I think, apart from the initial puzzlement of recognizing the inconsistency, most of us don’t give much thought at all to which day is 1. “Weekend” generally is used colloquially to mean whichever two simultaneous days the speaker or audience is off work, insofar as they have two consecutive days off work.
I believe, but I may be wrong, that the inconsistency arises from Sunday being the Christian sabbath. That “starts” the week, but it’s a traditional day off for religious observance. And this tradition goes back well before the 40 hour work week, and the common Monday–Friday work week. Which is to say that “weekend” didn’t originally have connotations about which days were work days, they were typically all work days except for the Christian sabbath. Which as a retcon makes the present colloquial usage even odder, even if it’s (maybe?) more consistent with how other countries/cultures use it.
umanwizard · 3 years ago
> I say holdouts, because it helps to understand that this isn’t agreed on even within the US.
I disagree. I can’t remember having ever seen calendars display any day other than Sunday as the first of the week, except in the case of computer software made by non-Americans who didn’t think to localize it.
pantojax45 · 3 years ago
There’s still ambiguity in verbal language. On Sunday, if someone messages you “let’s do this next week” - do they mean “in the next 6 days” or “after 7 days from now”?
cercatrova · 3 years ago
Almost universally meant to mean in the next 6 days. Next week implies after 7 days.
pantojax45 · 3 years ago
Slightly confused - don’t your two sentences contradict each other?
Edit: also on a Friday, you can say next week and mean Monday (3 days later)
cercatrova · 3 years ago
Sorry I read your post incorrectly. If I say, let's do something this week, it means up to and including Sunday. If I say next week, it means after the upcoming Sunday.
NorwegianDude · 3 years ago
That makes sense for places where the week starts with Monday, but I guess this week means up to and including Saturday for Americans if it's actually normal that the week starts with Sunday.
I was always under the impression that Americans basically agreed on that the week started on Monday, that the weekend ended with Sunday and that next week meant after Sunday. I thought Sunday as the first day in American calendars was a "yeah, it's stupid we do it like that, but I guess that is how it used to be back in the days" kind of thing.
cercatrova · 3 years ago
Your 2nd paragraph is correct. No one actually thinks about when the week starts, it's almost universally understood to be Monday based even if the calendar says Sunday based.
cgriswald · 3 years ago
I disagree with the sibling poster. Your first paragraph is correct.
The week starts on Sunday. The weekend ends on Sunday. It only makes sense if you consider two adjoining endpoints of previous weeks to be one "weekend", which I've never known anyone not to do without thinking about it.
Someone talking at work might mean something different, but I don't usually hear "next week" to mean Monday-Sunday in general conversation and we'd probably clarify for Sunday anyway.
If someone says "The week of the 15th" and Sunday is the 15th, they mean the seven days from 15-21 not the seven days of 9-15.
"Next week, maybe Sunday" means the next calendar Sunday as in Sunday-Saturday, not the Sunday after that as in Monday-Sunday.
Anyone who says otherwise is selling calendars with a Monday start of the week. :)
samatman · 3 years ago
This isn't almost universal, in fact it's generally understood not to be the case, some of the time.
If I say "next Wednesday" on Thursday, I mean the Wednesday of next week, not "this Wednesday" which was yesterday.
"Next Weekday" of a weekday that's yet to happen, means one week after that day within this week.
"Next Weekday" of a weekday that already happened, means the very next instance of that day in the calendar, "This Weekday" refers to the past.
"Hey, this Tuesday was your presentation right? How did it go?"
"We rescheduled for next Monday actually". <- this is obviously the Monday after the coming weekend.
cercatrova · 3 years ago
You're right. I intuitively know and follow what you're saying, but I didn't put it into words correctly.
hunter2_ · 3 years ago
"Next" has terrible ambiguity, beyond the phrase "next week." If it's Monday and someone says "next Thursday" do they mean the coming Thursday (+3) or the one after that (+10)? I assume the latter, except when it's said by people who I know disagree!
But even with people I don't put in that category, I'd hesitate to assume +13 days if they said "next Sunday" on Monday. More likely they mean +6 when it's so far out...
mynameisvlad · 3 years ago
“Next Thursday” vs “next week Thursday”. The former, for me, means +3 and the latter +10. I don’t think there’s ever been a time when someone I know has said the former but implied +10.
Interesting to see so many people here who do interpret it that way.
hunter2_ · 3 years ago
In my area it's fairly common to say, for example, "X happens every Thursday. Do you want to go this Thursday or next Thursday?" which is equivalent to +3 versus +10.
the_af · 3 years ago
Same with my wife; she tells apart "this Thursday" and "next Thursday" in exactly the way you describe. I don't. Predictably, all sorts of confusions ensue.
the_af · 3 years ago
Tell me about it. My wife and I cannot agree on the meaning of "next" for almost anything, and we are Spanish speakers.
For example, when driving, to her "turn at the next corner" means "the corner after the next", while to me it means "the corner the car is about to cross". What I call "the next corner" to her is "this corner".
Same with days, of course.
It drives me crazy!
eyelidlessness · 3 years ago
I don’t know if it would translate, but I’ve had good outcomes navigating with my brother by saying “following” instead of “next”. As in “okay we’re coming to Delaware street and we’ll take a left at the following intersection”. It’s not even language my brother uses but he immediately understood “next next not this next” and so I stuck with it.
hunter2_ · 3 years ago
Oh wow. The only context in which I (and people around me) use "next" like that is with days, which is confusing in its own right, but at least it's contained.
pitaj · 3 years ago
That kind of ambiguity is everywhere, though. If it's Friday, and I say "next Monday", those two days are close enough that you may need clarification - do I mean "this coming Monday" or "the Monday after that". Or another example for day 1 = Monday, if on Sunday I said "let's do that next week", you may need the same form of clarification.
mynameisvlad · 3 years ago
I don’t see any ambiguity in “next Monday”. It literally is saying the next day which is Monday.
“Next week” on a Sunday is ambiguous because some people consider the new week to have started while others consider it to start the next day.
tpmoney · 3 years ago
Human speech doesn't often work on just the literal meanings of words though, hence the ambiguity. Very very rarely at 10PM on a Sunday night does anyone mean "tomorrow" when they say "See you at the club next Monday". They usually don't mean that because we have the word "tomorrow" and that's more precise.
Likewise, on a Friday afternoon most people (in my experience) don't say "Hey we're having a cook out next Sunday, want to come?" and mean the Sunday in exactly two days. Again, because the phrase "this Sunday" is available and more precise.
In fact, I think in my experience "next X" almost always implies a full 7 days between now and the X. If my boss on Monday says "we need this in production next Friday" I don't normally take that to mean "we need this in production in the next 4 days.
samatman · 3 years ago
There's a real ambiguity, but it isn't in the examples you gave.
It's the case of saying "next Tuesday" on a Thursday, and meaning that no Tuesdays will pass before the date in question, versus saying "next Thursday" on a Tuesday, where a Thursday will happen before the date.
That's because on Thursday, "this Tuesday" has already happened. But sometimes people will be thinking of "Tuesday after next" when they say "next Tuesday" on a Thursday, because they mean "the Tuesday after the coming Tuesday" and not "the Tuesday of next week".
tpmoney · 3 years ago
Both cases are still ambiguous because even though “this” Tuesday has already passed on Thursday, no one gets confused when you say “I’m having a cook out this Tuesday, want to come?” because the future tense of the sentence automatically excludes the Tuesday in the current week which has already passed.
Since “next Tuesday” also puts the sentence context into the future, the ambiguity exists around whether it means “Tuesday in 5 days” or “Tuesday in 12 days”
If no such ambiguity existed, we wouldn’t need common phrases like “this coming Tuesday” which clarifies the speaker is talking about the “next Tuesday with no other Tuesday’s in between”
Amusingly I don’t think there’s much ambiguity around “the Tuesday after next” as a phrase even though it should be equally ambiguous, but I’ve never heard that phrase to mean “3 Tuesdays from now”
the_af · 3 years ago
> I don’t see any ambiguity in “next Monday”. It literally is saying the next day which is Monday.
But when communicating with other people, it matters what they understand. And I've come across enough people who don't use "next Monday" like that to understand the word "next" means trouble.
djur · 3 years ago
The answer is the same on Saturday as on Sunday, so that doesn't really matter.
watwut · 3 years ago
The ones I see always starts with Monday, but we all have to configure every single peace of software that comes from USA to show it as such.
irrational · 3 years ago
No. It starts from the creation story where creation starts on Sunday and ends on Friday and then the seventh day (Saturday) is the day of rest - the sabbath.
You are thinking of how Jesus is said to resurrect on the first day of the week (I.e., Sunday) and later that becomes the Sabbath day for (most) Christians.
eyelidlessness · 3 years ago
Thank you for the additional detail about the origin of Sunday as a sabbath, and the nuance that it’s not observed on Sunday by all Christians. I was not actually thinking about the resurrection story, or even about how Sunday came to be observed as such, but it led to some interesting reading.
I've found it hard to search for details of this aspect of labor history because results are almost entirely about the movement for, and details of, what came after: the 8 hour workday. But my understanding is still that Sunday was historically the conventional rest day in the US (at least for workers who could enjoy a rest day at all), regardless of the history of the traditional Jewish/pre-Christian/Restorationist sabbath observed on Saturday. The best source I’ve found so far[1] doesn’t explicitly say so, but does strongly suggest that Saturday came later as a recognized day off because the competing “weekend” equivalent spanned Sunday–Monday (I’m also fascinated to have learned about Saint Monday). I’m sure there are other sources to find, but I’m going to leave it here to enjoy the remainder of my rest day/weekend/first day of the week.
1: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200117-the-modern-phe...
yepguy · 3 years ago
Obviously Sunday is the left end of the week, Saturday the right.
Lio · 3 years ago
If that's the case then surely it should be called the "weekends" plural rather than just "weekend" singular. :P
beaned · 3 years ago
The way I've always thought it was meant to be is that the "weekend" is really the "week ends," meaning start and end, the same way a shoelace has 2 ends.
umanwizard · 3 years ago
Weeks are always displayed as beginning on Sunday in the US (I get confused and annoyed when a calendar app is improperly localized for en_US and shows weeks as starting on Monday).
Separately, we call Saturday and Sunday “the weekend”. Yes, these two facts are logically inconsistent, but we live with it and I have never observed it causing any difficulty in practice.
irrational · 3 years ago
The concept of weekend is quite a recent development.
The concept of Sunday as the first day of the week dates back thousands of years.
ivlad · 3 years ago
Why is this important? Maybe it was, but the ISO standard now is that Sunday is the last day of the week.
irrational · 3 years ago
I was responding to the post above mine and not to the topmost post.
jtsiskin · 3 years ago
Think of it like bookend: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bookend
lloeki · 3 years ago
> May be the author got tired (or whatever he took started to wear off)
Reading through to the last bits I was foreseeing the launch of a specific space faring vehicle except it would have failed in some way because of non-metric units (purposefully not saying of which kind) thus closing by leaving a loose thread up another level of insanity.
rspeed · 3 years ago
I had a hell of a time trying to find a pill planner that didn't start on Sunday. I was ready to 3D print one when I found one that's circular.
shadowofneptune · 3 years ago
The Swatch time is a variation on the fractional day. Astronomers use it, with .00 being noon and .50 being midnight. You can extend it to any precision you like, 1/100,000th of a day makes for a good 'decimal second.'
I like knowing what percentage of the day is over, a friend of mine says it'd drive her crazy knowing exactly how much time gets wasted.
dwighttk · 3 years ago
Why does midnight matter? And since we don’t use local noon, why does noon matter?
shadowofneptune · 3 years ago
It matters in the astronomer's case (which does use local noon) because that's when they do their work. For the version where .00 is midnight in the local time zone, well... it's how we live our lives! I'd argue the week is more important than the months for the same reason.
magic_hamster · 3 years ago
Sunday is the first day of the week in Israel, not just on paper but very much in practice. I know this because Israelis I worked with will be unavailable on Friday but they will start emailing you Sunday morning.
Shatnerz · 3 years ago
> Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
First day of the working week is Sunday in Nepal. I assume they consider Sunday the start of the week, but I'm not Nepalese. This is just a random fact I remember from visiting.
poisonarena · 3 years ago
>Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week
Sunday is the first day of the week in much of the middle east
irrational · 3 years ago
Why is it illogical to have Sunday be the first day of the week? Maybe Saturday is logically the first day of the week since nobody in their right minds would want a work day (assuming a 5 day work Week) to be the first day. Like eating dessert first, starting the week with a day off just makes logical sense.
Jorengarenar · 3 years ago
Why? One word: weekEND
dwighttk · 3 years ago
Which end?
messe · 3 years ago
The one at the end of the week, and not the start.
irrational · 3 years ago
Maybe it is both ends. Like book ends.
thfuran · 3 years ago
But then surely a consecutive Saturday and Sunday would be weekends rather than a single weekend?
irrational · 3 years ago
The concept of a weekend is a recent development that I don’t think really corresponds to what the first day of the week is (which was conceived of as Sunday for thousands of years before the weekend was invented).
When the weekend was invented, Sunday as the sabbath was still a real thing for many people. I have to wonder if originally only Saturday was conceived as the weekend, followed by the week start and sabbath of Sunday. Then, as Sunday became secularized, the weekend was extended to include Sunday.
irrational · 3 years ago
scheme271 · 3 years ago
Except for Friday-Saturday is the weekend in quite a few countries especially islamic ones. Israel also has Friday-Saturday weekends to make observing the Sabbath easier. There may be other exceptions as well.
smsm42 · 3 years ago
Colloquially, lot of places use 12h - it's always "we're going to the restaurant at 8", never "at 20" or "at 20:00", at least in the countries I've lived or visited. But officially it's still 24h - which may be more confusing or less confusing, depending on your point of view.
And times (with timezones, and leap seconds, and DST, and so on) add another level of fun to it.
Symbiote · 3 years ago
There are certainly countries where a translation of "16 o'clock" or similar is the default way to say that time.
France is one I'm familiar with.
In Britain, people reading out an important time presented in 24h format (like when discussing booking a flight) will usually read it out as fifteen thirty etc.
fire · 3 years ago
just fyi the author's pronouns are they/them ( they're in their twitter bio )
pezezin · 3 years ago
> - Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
Japan does too; I blame the American occupation (and plenty of other illogical things).
Fatnino · 3 years ago
In Hebrew the days of the week don't really have names. They are simply called (direct translation here) "first day" "second day" etc. Except for Saturday which is called "Shabbat" instead of "seventh day".
smsm42 · 3 years ago
> Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
No, in Israel Sunday is the first day of the week too, because the weekend is Friday-Saturday (Shabbath). In Hebrew, though, the week days are named rather simply - except for Sabbath, they are just "Day 1" (Sunday), ..., "Day 6" (Friday). OTOH, that's exactly how they were numbered in the Bible, so...
WastingMyTime89 · 3 years ago
> Also, for those interested, look up Swatch time invented in late 90s and touted as more logical replacement of the mess that we have.
Swatch Time is just a rebranding of French Revolutionary decimal time displaying the hour number next to the minute. It was introduced a bit before the metric system in 1793 but was made optional in 1795 and finally dropped in 1806. Swatch has always been extremely good at marketing but I don’t like crediting a corporation for something they didn’t invent.
LukeShu · 3 years ago
> May be the author got tired (or whatever he took started to wear off)
The author uses they/them pronouns. And more likely their ADHD episode started to wear down, rather than something they took started to wear off.
mcv · 3 years ago
This is incorrect. The US is hardly the only country where people consider Sunday to be the first day of the week. Anyone with some understanding of the history of our weekdays does so, and that historical understanding is not limited to Americans.
It's also not true that the US is the only country to use 12h time; many countries do. Including mine. If you need to write time without ambiguity, you use the 24h format, but in everyday use and in cases where context makes it clear what you mean, people use the 12h format.
psnehanshu · 3 years ago
Yeah I agree. 12h time is the natural consequence of using analog clocks where one rotation of the hour hand on the dial represents 12 hours. But I guess it won't be hard to represent 24h if the speed of the hour hand is halved, although I have never seen such clocks.
em-bee · 3 years ago
you can find them in novelty shops
psnehanshu · 3 years ago
Idk what "novelty shop" is.
em-bee · 3 years ago
midasuni · 3 years ago
What country is that? I’ve only really seen 12h time in America and it’s colonies.
weberer · 3 years ago
In Finland its common to use 12h time in conversation. Digital clocks are 24 hours, but many people still use analog clocks, which are always 12 hours.
And for what its worth, the name for Wednesday, keskiviiko, means midweek.
midasuni · 3 years ago
German “mittwoch” for midweek too.
We might say beers at 5, but I haven’t seen “5.00p” rather than 1700 in written form for decades outside of the US
mcv · 3 years ago
Netherland. I suspect it's pretty common across continental Europe.
typetheorist · 3 years ago
A lot of people have already commented on how Israel and the Middle East consider Sunday to be the first day of the week, but I'd like to add that the week itself seems to originate in Judaism (Wikipedia, "Week"):
"A continuous seven-day cycle that runs throughout history without reference to the phases of the moon was first practiced in Judaism, dated to the 6th century BC at the latest."
In Judaism the week starts from Sunday, so you could argue that it's not completely illogical for it to be the case in the US.
Changing the rest day of the week to Sunday was a change made in Christianity by the Council of Laodicea:
"Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord’s Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ".
sqs · 3 years ago
> Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
What do you mean by this? I mean, what behaviors do US people exhibit to show this to be true?
I was born in the US and have lived here almost my entire life. I consider Monday to be the first day of the week, and I haven't seen anything in US culture to indicate that other people disagree or behave otherwise (except for the default behavior in some calendar apps in the US locale).
Symbiote · 3 years ago
Printing all calendars and design all calendar software with Sunday in the first column is a big clue that most Americans consider Sunday the start of the week.
In Europe, printed calendars and apps have Monday in the first column.
DocTomoe · 3 years ago
Being European, I prefer "Sunday in column 1" calendars.
Not for religious reasons or because I consider Sunday to actually be the first day of the week, but for practical reasons: It gives me a clearer understanding of the workweek. It moves Wednesday (in my language called "middle of the week") into the week's center. It deemphasizes the weekend for planning (and thus for planning work), making them better rest days.
YMMV.
Digory · 3 years ago
All of Christianity puts Sunday as the first day, as does the calendar of Judaism.
Saturday as the Jewish Sabbath, Sunday as the ‘the Lord’s day” in Christianity.
Matthew 28:1
The Resurrection
[1] Now after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the tomb.
eps · 3 years ago
"Tuesday" in Russian is "vtornik", which is derived from "second". "Thursday" is "chetverg", which is a variation of "four".
So, no, not all Christianity.
Digory · 3 years ago
The start of the Russian week was Sunday until the Soviets tried to stamp out Sunday.
The current date order is still from 1940, when the state was opposed to Christianity.
https://www.rbth.com/history/335241-week-in-russia-began-sun...
anjbe · 3 years ago
Thanks for the link. It had another interesting fact:
> In 1978, the UN recommended that Monday be made the first day of the week in most countries. It was established in 1988, according to ISO 8601, an international standard for exchange and communication of date and time-related data.
I’m really curious about why the UN made that decision. Is this the primary reason so many countries now consider Monday the first day?
eps · 3 years ago
That's an odd article.
"Nedelya" doesn't refer to the first day of the week, at least not now. It means is "week". I can see how it may have meant "do-nothing" and also refer to the rest day, but it doesn't place it at the front of the week.
Monday (ponedelnik) splits into "po" and "nedelya". "Po" is a repetition indicator, not "after", so it's more of something that happens every week.
As I've said - Tuesday is "2nd day", Thursday is "4rd day" and Friday is "5th" (pyatnitca - pyat - five). So 3 days out of 7 point at the start of the week being Monday. These names date to the ancient times, not something Soviets invented.
Wednesday ("sreda") does mean "middle day", but it refers to the middle of the work week, excluding Saturday and Sunday, which are named after Christian events and (likely) extended the original 5-day week.
So if you are to argue that a week that has 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th days literally spelled out starts on its 7th day, the only explanation would be that Russians used 0-based indexing for the week days. Which is alright with me even if somewhat far-fetched.
PS. Also, the calendar reform was not a move against the religion, but because Russia Empire was literally 13 days behind the rest of the world, which was not very convenient.
eps · 3 years ago
Erratum:
"... 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th ..." should read "... 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th..."
mullingitover · 3 years ago
> - Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
There's one other country in particular that firmly designates Saturday as the seventh day of the week: Israel. (Canada, Japan and Brazil also use Sunday as the first day of the week.)
I'm not religious, but I was raised Seventh-day Adventist, which worships on the seventh day, which for the past couple millennia has been Saturday. There is no end to conspiracy theories in the church about the seventh day of the week being designated as Sunday and how this (and particularly the compulsion to worship on Sunday instead of Saturday) is a sign of the end times.
dogmatism · 3 years ago
>despite being long form, fits Twitter format very well
It actually reminded me of, and made me sad for the days of the old internet. I don't think this should be on twitter but it's own site
smegger001 · 3 years ago
just think if he had to explain how the date for easter is calculated
sva_ · 3 years ago
> Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
I think Israel, and Jews in general consider Sunday the first day of the week.
ordu · 3 years ago
> This is absolutely hilarious
Not absolutely, it could be even more hilarious, if PM/AM switches happened at 11:00 and 23:00, not at 12:00 and 00:00. Or even better, the switch could ignore seasonal timezone shift.
unity1001 · 3 years ago
> DST
I always felt that DST was invented to prevent people from realizing that they are forced to wake up and get out of the house before dawn during the winter. It would literally alienate people from work life.
saalweachter · 3 years ago
Winter time is "real time". Summer time is when DST takes effect.
coldtea · 3 years ago
>* - US (and maybe one or two English-speaking countries) are the only ones using 12h time, the rest of the world uses 24hrs, however 12h _sometimes_ is used conversationally;*
I think most countries use 12h time casually (conversationally and so on), but most understand 24h time - and it's used officially (e.g. in state communications) in many. It's in the US though that people often need it explained.
Morgawr · 3 years ago
> - Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
Just adding to the rest of the responses but Japan also has a very... contrived relationship with what counts as "the beginning of the week" and most people would say Sunday is that day.
fomine3 · 3 years ago
N=1: No, Monday is that day and I believe I'm majority, despite many Japanese calendars are beginning with Sunday
Morgawr · 3 years ago
I can only talk about the people I personally know and I've asked this question myself (because it's funny and interesting from a cultural perspective) and most people I asked said "Sunday", although as I said it's not set in stone.
fomine3 · 3 years ago
Do you work at big tech in Japan? I suspect that people around you tend to think as international (read: US, in Japan) way.
lr4444lr · 3 years ago
Israel also starts the week on Sunday, in keeping with Saturday being the Jewish end of week sabbath.
soneca · 3 years ago
Living in Brazil, I always heard that Sunday is the first day of the week. Accordingly, we do name most of the week days by number, sort of. Monday is ”Segunda-feira”, which a literal translation would be “Second fair”. The “Third fair, Fourth fair, Fifth fair, Sixth-fair”.
throwaway888abc · 3 years ago
at Swatch
TaylorAlexander · 3 years ago
Nit: foone uses they/them pronouns and has previously expressed some displeasure with the way they get misgendered when their posts hit hacker news. Queer folks seem to agree that if you aren’t sure what someone’s pronouns are, they/them is a good default (only until they tell you or you find out the correct pronouns).
As a non-binary person myself I always find it interesting when people assume he/him for every random internet commenter. Happens on HN a lot.
zxexz · 3 years ago
Not sure why this got flagged.
Anyways, I find it’s best to use they/them pronouns (or rather remain gender/pronoun neutral) when referring to people on the internet, unless their pronouns are obvious.
User23 · 3 years ago
> - Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
I assume Israel must too since shabbat, the seventh day of rest, is Saturday.
npsomaratna · 3 years ago
Over here in Sri Lanka:
1) I've seen calendars with both starting days (Sunday/Monday). Anecdotally, calendars with Sunday as the first day seemed to be more popular when I was a kid; now, calendars with Monday as the first day seem to be more common.
2) The 12-hour system is far more popular here than the 24-hour system. Not that we don't use it, but in my experience, 24-hour tends to be mainly used in professional settings; 12-hour is used essentially everywhere else.
davchana · 3 years ago
> US (and maybe one or two English-speaking countries) are the only ones using 12h time, the rest of the world uses 24hrs, however 12h _sometimes_ is used
India uses 12h time (except in military talk; & railway timetable display boards) in day to day life. I have never heard in 29 years somebody using 15 as 3, or 20 as 8pm. Even till few years ago, atound 2008, flights times at Delhi Airport too were displayed in 12h, on mechanical card spinner display board (where a card with letter falls & next one comes, on a roll until desired letter comes). Seeing that board as a kid was highlight of my childhood trips to airport.rt.
el-salvador · 3 years ago
> - Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
Where I live we are taught that Monday is the first day of the week, yet most calendars start on Sunday. It's the sort of question you ask your teachers at school and nobody knows how to answer.
fritolaid · 3 years ago
In Arabic, Sunday is Ahad (first) Monday is Ithnain (second) and so on until Friday which is Jum’a (gathering) and Sabit (comes from Sabbath I think?) as Saturday.
So the US is not the only country that considers Sunday to be the first day, etymologically speaking. I think the first day in the Middle East is Saturday because people work on that day (on Friday is a day off, unless things changed since the 70s)
…
retrocryptid · 3 years ago
The US, Canada, China, Japan and most of South America. Oh. And the Phillipines consider Sunday the beginning of the week. And someone just shouted at me that Israel considers Sunday the beginning of the week, but that seems unlikely to me.
anjbe · 3 years ago
What’s unlikely about that? The Jewish seventh‐day Sabbath is literally the founding principle of the seven‐day week.
csours · 3 years ago
I saw someone wearing a Swatch Time t-shirt today!
srcreigh · 3 years ago
I picked 3 random countries and 2/3 of them had calendars starting with Sunday.
Calendars starting with Sunday: Nambia, Trinidad and Tobago. Calendars starting with Monday: Benin.
quickthrower2 · 3 years ago
Perhaps you mean 24h _sometimes_ is used conversationally!
My devices all show 12h too.
The thing is most people know if it means the evening or morning.
But when programming, and dealing with times from all over the shop - please show me 24h clocks!
apexalpha · 3 years ago
>- Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
Does anyone know why? This has always seemed a bit weird to me. I mean the US is a fairly religious country and it's pretty much known to anyone that Sunday is the 7th day in Christianity?
And on the first day God ended His work which He had done, and He rested on the first day from all His work which He had done. Then God blessed the first day and sanctified it, because in it He rested from all His work which God had created and made.
edit: just looked it up. Apparently Sunday = Restday is a catholic thing and Jews / Muslims use Sunday as their first day!
How and why America switched as Christian nation I'm still not sure.
pfortuny · 3 years ago
Mmmh…
Sunday is religiously the first day of the week (the Lord rises on “the first day of the week…” (John)).
It has become the “last day” only because people rest after their jobs (i.e. at the end of the “week”).
But conceptually, it is still the first day. It is indeed the First day of the new creation (Redemption).
jmopp · 3 years ago
Sunday is still considered the first day in Christianity. Jesus rising on the first day led to Christians celebrating the resurrection on Sunday and it eventually eclipsing the Saturday Sabbath. Also much of Latin America and Southern Africa also consider Sunday the first day of the week.
apexalpha · 3 years ago
Mhh, yes. It seems you're right. Saturday is the day God rested supposedly?
Wow it really hasn't stuck. I stand corrected.
disruptthelaw · 3 years ago
In Hebrew the days of the week are named numerically: first day, second day etc. Sunday is the first day of the week in israel. Saturday, the last day of the Hebrew week is the only one not named numerically, it’s called sabbath.
kelnos · 3 years ago
Ignoring the religious angle entirely, I've always thought it was weird that people consider Monday the first day of the week, because to me, Sunday and Saturday are at either "end" of the week, hence they are called "weekend" days.
If Monday is day 1, then Saturday is day 6 and Sunday is day 7, so Saturday is no longer a weekend.
(Yes, I know that you can argue it a different way such that it still makes sense with Monday as the first day of the week. But it just feels "wrong" to me, probably because I lived the first 15-20 years of my life without even knowing that anyone else didn't consider Sunday to be the first day of the week. Stuff you grow up with is hard to change.)
(Relatedly, no matter how hard I try, Celsius degrees never feel natural to me. Ditto for kilograms when talking about how much a human weighs. I've managed to get myself comfortable with meters and liters, at least, though I still sometimes have to "translate" in my head for things to make sense to me.)
At any rate, I do wonder when this difference solidified. Was Monday considered the first day of the week in western Europe during the period when Europe was colonizing pre-United-States? If so, when and why did the US (or colonists in the pre-US) switch to Sunday?
dkdbejwi383 · 3 years ago
The argument I’ve heard against this is that Sunday is a week”end” day, not a week “start” day - here interpreting “end” as “terminator” rather than something like “bookend”
watwut · 3 years ago
It is more logical for Monday to be first, because it comes right after end of the last week - week-end. The last two days are weekend - end of the week.
madsohm · 3 years ago
In Denmark we use 24h, but we call them by their 12h equivalent, e.g. "15:15" is "a quarter past three". However, you could also say: "It's now 21 30" to signify half past nine. Or some people would say: "It's half 10". Okay, having 24h clocks don't make it easier it seems.
anoopelias · 3 years ago
> Also, for those interested, look up Swatch time invented in late 90s and touted as more logical replacement of the mess that we have.
There is Tranquility Calendar[1] that was proposed sometime back:
- Starts at the time when man landed on Moon. (Tranquility base)
- 1 year = 13 months each of 28 days (13*4 = 364) + 1 Armstrong day
- Exactly 4 week months.
Back in 2019, (50th year of moon landing) I happened to build a web representation of the same[2].
kelnos · 3 years ago
> Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
Not correct, as others have pointed out. Regardless, why is it more or less logical for any particular day to be considered the start of the week? Hell, it seems that even in several countries that use Monday as the first day of the week, the names of the day reflect that Monday is the second day of the week!
I personally like Sunday and Saturday to be the opposite ends of the week. Sunday and Saturday are both considered rest days for the most part, and I think rest days are a good way to both start and finish your week. But I recognize that there's still really no logical basis for this; it's just what I grew up with so it "feels right". Just as those of you who grew up in a Monday-indexed week are used to it, so that "feels right" to you.
mmmmmbop · 3 years ago
Do you consider Sunday to be part of the weekend?
weberer · 3 years ago
Why not? The head and the tail are both ends.
bradwood · 3 years ago
> Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
Many Arabic countries have the weekend on Friday and Saturday and work on Sunday. I think they probably all start the week on Sunday for this reason. No idea why the US does too though!
belter · 3 years ago
Hopefully the Aliens will leave the planet before the discussion gets to G11n...
"The Problem with Time & Timezones" - https://youtu.be/-5wpm-gesOY
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalization_and_local...
krageon · 3 years ago
> Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
In a few EU countries people have started implying Sunday could somehow be the start (even though they are protestant societies! Makes no sense), so I think the US is leaking lunacy to the rest of the world.
lagadu · 3 years ago
Not just the US, it's also present in at least part of catholic Europe: in Portugal Monday is explicitly called "Second Market" (Segunda-Feira).
bipson · 3 years ago
> - US (and maybe one or two English-speaking countries) are the only ones using 12h time, the rest of the world uses 24hrs, however 12h _sometimes_ is used conversationally;
For German speaking countries: rather always#. In fact, you don't even say 3 PM. Just "drei". I think everything from 8 AM to 7 PM is considered "business hours" - and everything else needs clarification ("4 in the morning").
And we call 0:00 "12 Uhr Mitternacht" as well, I think nobody says "0 Uhr". But at least writing it down makes sense.
# Nobody I knows really uses "15 Uhr" to say 3 PM (people might sometimes do, but I never hear it, it sounds wrong, maybe "nerdy")
dark-star · 3 years ago
I live in Germany and I have the exact opposit experience from everything you just said. the only people that use "drei" or "halb fünf" etc. are those one generation older than me, and everyone says "null Uhr" or "vierundzwanzig Uhr" (depending on which day-crossing you're referring to), I have honestly never before heard the phrase "12 Uhr Mitternacht". "Die Party geht bis 24 Uhr" oder "..bis 0 Uhr". Nobody says "die Party geht bis 12 Uhr Mitternacht", do they?
I guess it depends on where you live exactly in D/A/CH shrug
bipson · 3 years ago
I guess I am from (and work with) the previous generation.
I haven't used "Die Party geht bis..."# for almost a decade now, that might be a hint.
#and my "parties" never ended before midnight for more than 2 decades now.
bjarneh · 3 years ago
> the rest of the world uses 24hrs, however 12h _sometimes_ is used conversationally;
Here in Norway we use 24 hours when writing; but we use 12 hour system when speaking - if that makes any sense?
I.e. we would say: "Vi spiser middag klokka fem (5)" [We eat dinner at five o'clock]; but we'd write it with 17 typically. We never use the terms AM/PM but can occasionally specify daytime/nighttime if it's uncertain which of the two we are talking about. I.e. "Jeg kom hjem fra jobb klokka fem (5) om morgenen" [I came home from work at five in the morning].
dark-star · 3 years ago
I guess that's what he meant by "sometimes conversationally"?
bjarneh · 3 years ago
It could be, but since it could also be interpreted as sometimes used, I wrote a comment to say that we use the 12 hour system exclusively when we speak about time, and the 24 hour system for written purposes. Perhaps that's what he meant, but I'm not sure...
kmclean · 3 years ago
Sunday is also the first day of the week in Canada (actually a separate country from the US despite appearances).
henriquecm8 · 3 years ago
> - Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
In Brazil, I think most people consider Sunday the first the of the week, in Portuguese the days of the week sound like ordinal numbers, Monday sounds like 2nd, Tuesday sounds 3rd, and so on. So it's pretty logical to consider Sunday the first day of the week.
ubermonkey · 3 years ago
I don't know that we necessarily consider Sunday first in any way except in the default / traditional presentation of weeks in calendars -- which is to say, it's a visual thing but not something that seems to impact work or life in any meaningful sense. I think pretty much all calendaring programs can show Monday as the first day if you prefer.
stjohnswarts · 3 years ago
What is the advantage of adopting any of those, other than being a bit more in sync with other countries? None of them imply anything other than semantic difference, there is very little advantage and a lot of pain if we were to adopt those "standards".
gjvnq · 3 years ago
> - Per my knowledge US is the only country which stubbornly (and illogically) considers Sunday to be the first day of the week;
Brazil does the same as seemingly do Grece and Japan.
Also, in Portuguese, Monday is _segunda-feira_ which roughly translates as second-day.
nullc · 3 years ago
Wait until someone notices that _base 11_ is the natural base for a being with 10 fingers. A separate symbol for 10 is base 11, not base 10. Base 10 only has separate symbols for up to and including 9.
StingyJelly · 3 years ago
Maybe it's optimal to have an obvious overflow state
nullc · 3 years ago
Same can be said about many of the examples in the tweets. :)
philsnow · 3 years ago
Don't tell the aliens about the missing 12 days in 1752: https://www.augustachronicle.com/story/lifestyle/columns/201...
Archelaos · 3 years ago
This was harmless compared to the Swedish calendar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_calendar
crote · 3 years ago
Not to mention that quite a few countries are also missing those 12 days, but in completely different years. Greece did so in 1923, for example.
masklinn · 3 years ago
And iirc at least one country decided that was too simple, decided to gradually shift, then reverted, then did it in one go.
pezezin · 3 years ago
Another user mentioned that it was Sweden: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_calendar
dave4420 · 3 years ago
Or the 11 missing days in 1582.
I mean, programmers love to bitch about time zones, but that’s nothing compared to the stink we’d have raised if we’d been coding in a time when the date depended on which country you were in.
kevinpet · 3 years ago
It might actually have been easier. Our current time system is regular enough that you can get away with skipping many irregularities (leap year is pretty much the one that matters). If you were forced to regularly deal with time conversions, you would just accept that different people have different times and you just need to convert.
int_19h · 3 years ago
This is still the case, since timezone differences affect day boundaries.
dave4420 · 3 years ago
Not to the same extent. Sure it can be Wednesday 28th in Paris while it’s still Tuesday 27th in London… but then it will be Wednesday 28th in London soon.
That’s really not the same thing as it being Wednesday 28th in Paris while it’s Wednesday 17th in London. When the 28th rolls round in London, it won’t be a Wednesday…
dathinab · 3 years ago
It's not just days, there is a whole time period of a bunch of years where its not fully clear if they did exist or where skipped. I just forgot when.
ghosty141 · 3 years ago
This is sadly more of an urban legend. There recently was an article about this which also disproved this theory quite well, best seen in other civilizations that have no connection to the european one.
Joeri · 3 years ago
Or the missing day in samoa in 2011. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-16351377
w-m · 3 years ago
At least we all agree that as one week is 7 days, when we say we'll meet in two weeks, that'll be in 14 days. Right, guys? Oh no...
gonzus · 3 years ago
This is just a word, which although originally means "fifteen days", it is actually used for "two weeks". The same thing happens in Spanish with "quincena" (which, confusingly, could also mean "fifteen days" or "half a month", at which point hilarity ensues).
athrowaway3z · 3 years ago
I'm a little bit surprised nobody pointed out the obvious.
When we first communicate with aliens about our time system we will start by explaining unix epoch.
Only than will we break out the spaghetti code required to map dates and zones and the uncertainty of some historical jumps.
MayeulC · 3 years ago
Well, unix timestamps are still tied to UTC, which has leap seconds for some reason...
I would prefer if we had a few seconds of an offset with Zulu "GMT" Time (pardon the double acronym).
umanwizard · 3 years ago
Unix time doesn’t include leap seconds.
NavinF · 3 years ago
As I said 6 months ago, "Naw that would make way too much sense": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30855416
naniwaduni · 3 years ago
Realistically, the first of our time systems that aliens are likely to encounter and associate with us is probably GPS time?
I sure as heck hope it is, at least...
MayeulC · 3 years ago
GPS only goes up to 20 years though.
Ever heard of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_week_number_rollover ?
russellbeattie · 3 years ago
We really need to update the system of years, it gives way too much weight to Christianity and serves as reinforcement to their misguided belief that their religion is somehow preeminent. It also gives the impression to the general public that history "began" at year 0, rather than being clear that recorded human history goes back around 5000 years.
Living in the year 5022 gives a much different perspective of history than starting at some random time in the middle of the Roman Empire. The other option is beginning the calendar at the first transistor or the first nuclear explosion signaling modern times.
The we could fix the months and be done with it.
mcv · 3 years ago
I thought it was nicely egalitarian and oecumenical to have the years from oune religion, months from another, and weekdays from a third. Let's give every religion a stake in the calendar system.
camdenlock · 3 years ago
Sounds like a person who thinks they know better than everyone else, that the tradeoffs accumulated in a system are just arbitrary and worthless. “Tear it all down, I can build something MUCH better!”
I look forward to the day when this person’s wishes to not be shared on HN are granted in full.
foone · 3 years ago
yeah, same. they really need to be blocked from HN, permanently.
myth2018 · 3 years ago
In Portuguese, Monday-Friday are numbered (2a-feira - 6a-feira).
I wonder if are there other languages also presenting this feature. I believe there are.
fortran77 · 3 years ago
Days of the week in Hebrew are numbered from Sunday "Yom Rishon" (First day, lit. "Head Day") to Friday "Yom Shishi" (Sixth Day). "Saturday" is "Shabbat" ("sabbath")
bonzini · 3 years ago
Czech but only for Thursday and Friday. And they're fourth and fifth, so it's off by one.
anjbe · 3 years ago
The Quakers numbered their weekdays and also their months, to avoid referencing foreign gods in their calendar. https://www.swarthmore.edu/friends-historical-library/quaker...
bloak · 3 years ago
Chinese numbers the days of the week, starting from 1 for Monday, but with a special name for Sunday, it seems.
I don't speak, or read, Chinese, but translate.google.com confirms this.
I am often curious about how Chinese expresses something, so I ask translate.google.com to translate an expression into Chinese, then I change the direction of translation and insert newlines between the Chinese characters. It's not a very reliable way of investigating how Chinese works, of course, but it's a lot faster than trawling through wiktionary.org. If anyone knows of a better way of getting an answer to that sort of question, please reply here!
autophagian · 3 years ago
For a few years I lived my life rigorously to the beat of the french revolutionary calendar - i was very enamoured by its consistent month partitioning, and dumping the leap day at the end of the year's festival days. The major downside is that the months were named after French seasonal characteristics, which... doesn't really work.
MayeulC · 3 years ago
Ooh, that's interesting. Did you use decimal time as well?
autophagian · 3 years ago
I gave it an honest try, but I found it much harder to adapt to than the calendar. I could just about do head-conversion for dates between Gregorian and Revolutionary calendars for things like appointments, but found it much harder to do it for both dates and time. I still have a love for the system, though.
tomcam · 3 years ago
The French revolutionaries made a whole lot of mistakes, some fatal, because they liked to dictate things top down.
mcculley · 3 years ago
I would bet large amounts of money that if we ever do encounter an alien civilization, it too will have weird ways of describing the universe, driven by legacy cruft.
walrus01 · 3 years ago
This gets even more complicated when you introduce dealing with foreign countries that actually don't follow the western calendar system. Such as the standard Persian calendar months and years. Also, did you know that the arabic Islamic calendar dates and the persian calendar dates don't agree? Because the traditional calendar dating back to the maximum geograhpical extent of the Persian empire is solar based, while the standard Islamic calendar is entirely lunar based.
And the persian calendar is solar based and the year resets on Nowruz (new years day) around the spring equinox, but the practiced holidays are based on the lunar islamic months? But also some holidays like Nowruz are observed based on the solar date.
This means you've got Nowruz occuring on approximately the same time in the weather season every year, while relative to the western calendar, notable holidays like Eid al-fitr and Eid al-adha and the start of Ramadan etc move backwards in calendar date approxiamtely 10 or 11 days per year. Some years Ramadan might occur in the middle of winter and much later on it will be in the middle of summer.
This series of tweets doesn't even begin to get into the possible opportunities for confusion when working between three different calendar systems... And western countries where the standard work week is M-F but others where Friday is the day of rest and people work on a 6-day work week on a persian or arabic islamic calendar, but some companies give their employees a two day weekend so they're off on Friday and Saturday, but the local timezone equivalent of Sunday is definitely a normal workday... I could go on.
aljgz · 3 years ago
mmmm wait until you know that Persians' extra day off is not Saturday, it's Thursday.
Also that in Muslim countries that take Sat and Sun off, they all leave at Friday noon to attend the Friday prayer.
Now what if you have a Persian embassy in a foreign country (they are at the verge of extinction though), it will be closed on Friday, Sat, and Sun!, plus all the holidays of Iran and the host country. They almost never work (This sentence was not only about their days off)
If you have a company that has a branch in Iran, no luck for remote meetings on Thursdays all the way to Sundays!
adaisadais · 3 years ago
The “religious leader not existing” argument is slightly comical lol.
giantrobot · 3 years ago
The Earth is in an elliptical orbit around the Sun and rotates on its axis at a ratio of roughly 365.25:1. The axial tilt of the planet is such that the northern and southern hemispheres have varying seasons at different portions of the orbit and those seasons materially affect the life of most of the larger animals on the surface.
There's not many intuitive ways to break that up unless you use a base365.25 number system.
Calendars can definitely be weird but they're working around non-integer natural ratios.
imtringued · 3 years ago
To be fair I am more worried that longtermists built the entirety of human society with the assumption that there are no aliens and the rest of the universe is free for the taking. If aliens pop up there will have to be bloodshed.
Havoc · 3 years ago
Reminds me of the imperial measurements debate.
leto_ii · 3 years ago
Couldn't this whole thread just be condensed to: we have a thing called culture which is not completely rational or efficient? I'm sure the aliens would get that - they would probably have something similar, albeit with different irrationalities and inefficiencies.
113 · 3 years ago
That would be significantly less funny and interesting.
butwhywhyoh · 3 years ago
It would be exactly as funny and exactly as interesting, which is to say: not very.
This is right up there with noticing that sometimes the "b" in certain English words is completely silent! Haha isn't that totally irrational and crazy you guys??
allenu · 3 years ago
I didn't find it particularly funny either. It's mostly predicated on this belief that somehow we "should" have optimized our date and time system and that it's silly that we're using an inconsistent, legacy system formed for many cultural reasons.
My analogy is that it's like writing a tweetstorm about how aliens landed on Earth to find that humans use different languages! And different writing systems! How quaint!
Joker_vD · 3 years ago
Well, there are some languages that semi-regularly update their orthographies to better match their pronunciations.
And yes, the grammarians arbitrarily inserting random silent letter into middle of the words so those look more regular or match the (supposed) etymologies are annoying. English "doubt" never historically had "b" inside it either written or spoken: it was "dout", and it was pronounced like this. Same happened to French "doigt" — it used to be "doit" for as long as language itself was called French, but then some Latin-loving guy decided to stick "g" in so that it would be more obvious that the word descended from Latin "digitus".
lotu · 3 years ago
How I would have ended would be with the aliens saying we should just adopt galactic standard time because it is so much easier, but in fact it is twice as complicated and confusing, but they are used to it so it appears simple. Still funny better message.
probably_wrong · 3 years ago
You don't even have to introduce culture. "We built a simple time system a long time ago. Some of its initial assumptions were wrong and we've been patching it up as we go ever since". I'm sure the aliens have a word for "technical debt".
Also, dividing the day into 24hs is kind of genius. Sure, 10 is nice, but good luck dividing it neatly into 3 parts.
perilunar · 3 years ago
It's a shame though that a circle is not 24° (or 240°) instead of 360°. Having °'" match h'" would have been cool.
collinmanderson · 3 years ago
The 360 probably came from an approximation of the number of days in a year.
twelvechairs · 3 years ago
Parts of it yes. The day/month/year thing though is fundamenally based on astronomical observations that dont fit into each other with fractions (rotation of earth around sun, orbit of moon around earth, orbit of earth around sun) which is kind of missed here.
KaiserPro · 3 years ago
yes, but then it'd be dull and not funny. the whole USP of Foone is that they explain things in a fun and engaging way.
layer8 · 3 years ago
I’m pretty sure the alien calendar will be even weirder. ;)
kokizzu2 · 3 years ago
everything looks ok, except for Jesus is not being historical part, he just need to read more books
chungy · 3 years ago
There are quite a few misunderstandings with his assumptions in explaining the story.
I know, I know, it's supposed to be for humor, but for those of us that have read and understood the historical basis of the calendar system, it really kills the effect.
zazaulola · 3 years ago
How do you explain this one?
365 = 10^2 + 11^2 + 12^2 = 13^2 + 14^2
_k9eq · 3 years ago
I find the implication that aliens are rational and have no subrational concepts due to tradition and habit interesting, as it sort of implies that these kinds of outgrowths are not necessary and can just be done away with. The narrator starts from a position of not wanting to legitimize or historicize beyond reductive statements like "some ancient civilization did XYZ". I'll admit that I skimmed through the last part of the thread, so I might have missed something, but I don't see any mention of the decimal calendar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Republican_calendar, or why that failed. I get that this is supposed to be funny, but the indirect message of getting rid of whatever doesn't make conscious sense is simplistic, and spoils the fun for me. Humans are stupid, very funny.
Judgmentality · 3 years ago
[flagged]
Sebb767 · 3 years ago
> It is funny. You should try laughing at how dumb we are. It's fun.
But are we dumb or is this just a reductionist take at something that actually has some reason behind it?
Things simply stop being funny if you feel like important background is missing, no snobbery needed.
MegaButts · 3 years ago
People that are too dumb to understand satire while pointing out why it's satire are indeed dumb, and should laugh at their own stupidity. But people on HN care more about being smart than self-aware, which is why this site is full of the funniest comments. He may as well be arguing about why eating babies is a bad idea after reading A Modest Proposal.
daptaq · 3 years ago
> Do you also hate every story ever told?
I don't get why this should apply to every story.
> It is funny. You should try laughing at how dumb we are. It's fun.
Individual humans are stupid, probably most of the time, I don't disagree. But what this reminds me of is when people imagine stone age people as "ooga booga"-idiots, instead of human beings that might have not had access to the same technology and intellectual concepts that we can rightfully feel superior about. And as the narrator is implicitly taking sides with the alien, he too is looking down at us backward humans.
I don't know if you have ever met people who hate humanity and try to disassociate themselves the rest. They refer to us as "Humanoids" as if automata that they as superior being have the right to use and manipulate. It is a vibe similiar to this that I picked up, that I object to.
Thorentis · 3 years ago
Yeah, often people leap to "aliens" being some higher intelligence than us who will judge our poor sub-optimal decisions. Though to me it seems more likely that any life we encounter is more likely to be less intelligent, if intelligent at all.
hsn915 · 3 years ago
It's worse. "Aliens have the same taste in things as me". With the implications being something like "Aliens are super intelligent" and "I am super intelligent".
IAmVerySmart vibes
zaik · 3 years ago
Aliens with the ability to visit earth will be much more intelligent than humans.
generalizations · 3 years ago
Except that being farther along the tech tree doesn't imply greater intelligence any more than possessing a car implies greater intelligence than an ancient Roman.
antifa · 3 years ago
The alien that made the space ship will be smarter, the alien that arrives in the space ship might be less smart than us.
dawsmik · 3 years ago
If Aliens find us, it seems reasonable they would be smarter/more advanced.
jimmygrapes · 3 years ago
But would you say the same about humanity if we stumbled across an alien culture and were somehow able to communicate with them?
stjohnswarts · 3 years ago
Unless we find some microbes in our little solar system, I highly doubt this. Any civilization able to get to earth is likely to be at least an order of magnitude more intelligent than us.
haswell · 3 years ago
The thing that would've brought it around for me is a punchline where the alien says something like "wow, your system is so clean and simple compared to ours".
I do think there's a certain degree of humor when looking back at history. There are plenty of things to laugh at in hindsight. But the thing that rubs me wrong is the undertone that this is somehow a distinctly human trait or inherently a bad thing. That somehow only humanity is subject to the impact of evolution and gradual learning over time.
And to those complaining that we should just have fun with this, I get it. There's some funny stuff in there. But that shouldn't absolve the thread of criticism. It's fair to point out that it's a pretty reductionist take when combined with the implication that humans are uniquely stupid. It's an easy problem to solve with a very slight reframing. $0.02.
Sebb767 · 3 years ago
> But the thing that rubs me wrong is the undertone that this is somehow some distinctly human trait. That somehow only humanity is subject to the impact of evolution and gradual learning over time.
Well, to be fair, we really don't know that - we don't have another advanced civilization to compare us to.
But I fully agree, our system might have some legacy cruft, but it works surprisingly well. Joel Spolkys wise words on rewrites also apply to our calendar.
origin_path · 3 years ago
There's also a bunch of less subtle assumptions, like the obviousness of base 10. That comes from us having ten fingers, right? It's easy to imagine aliens having six fingers on each hand and then assuming that base 12 is the most obvious and logical base to use for everything.
avar · 3 years ago
There's no reason to suppose that an intelligent alien race would find it convenient to count things in base that matches the number of "fingers" they have, if they even have such a thing.
Whales aren't far from being intelligent enough to form a technical civilization, but their body plan makes it unlikely that they'd use their "fingers" (or fins) to count, or to communicate with other whales.
Even if you gave an alien two human hands and knew that their counting system's base was derived from physical features of their "hands" it's not obvious that they'd come up with either base-5 or base-10 if they where starting from first principles.
We have 3 joints that make up our fingers, but the "base 10" assumes we only use one of those. It's not obvious that even a close relative to humans wouldn't come up with base-20 or base-30 just from counting using their fingers.
If you straighten or bend your wrist to add an "extra" finger for counting you're now counting in base-6 on one hand, base-12 on both. Do the same with your elbow joint and you're base-7 and base-14, respectively.
syrrim · 3 years ago
Without fingers to manipulate ones environment, it would be incredibly difficult to develop any sort of technology.
yencabulator · 3 years ago
Not even humans always chose the exact mechanism current day westerners are familiar with: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger-counting
origin_path · 3 years ago
Yes, all granted, but I think the point is that without fingers tool use is hard, without tool use flying to other planets is hard, and we selected base 10 as the default despite its disadvantages, primarily because of our biology (unless there's some other advantage to base 10 I'm missing?).
To assume aliens wouldn't have fingers or do the same thing seems like the odd assumption. Whales are nowhere even close to creating technical civilization, that's really left field. Dolphins at least occasionally do use tools, I think, but without fingers they have to use their nose for everything and it really limits them.
otikik · 3 years ago
I think the reason whole fingers was picked over joints or phalanges is because when humans started counting stuff the probability of someone having missing a whole finger or two was higher than now (The life of a hunter-gatherer, accidents happen). When you are missing a finger you can still use your "stumps" to count in base-10, but your ability to count using joints or phalanges is impaired.
antifa · 3 years ago
Their calendar could be updated for interplanetary use.
hackerlight · 3 years ago
> subrational concepts
More like vestigial organs that our society isn't capable enough to excise.
haswell · 3 years ago
I don’t think it’s a question of whether or not society is capable. If we had to, we’d find a way to switch calendaring systems.
It’s more about pragmatism and priority. The world is filled with big problems that require global collaboration.
Collaboration on such a scale is hard. That we don’t spend time revamping a working system while other systems crumble and burn is arguably a good thing. It means we’re still at least aware of what matters.
There is nothing vestigial about time tracking. You can argue that the names of things are no longer useful, but at that point it’s time to throw out much of our language.
lyu07282 · 3 years ago
At the end of the story they isolate us from them and prevent us from reaching the stars, I don't think the implication is that this is just due to the weird calendar system. I think its more than that, our inability to rid ourselves from our tradition and religious heritage has more profound implications. We don't look at things rationally and make decisions to improve ourselves. The aliens may have gone through similar steps in their evolution of their civilization so they probably know what it *means* if a post-interstellar species still uses a gods birthday to count time.
We aren't making any collective rational decisions yet, we build elaborate structures around tradition that more or less managed to reduce our collective human suffering at least in the northern hemisphere. It took us hundreds of years to rid ourselves from slavery and it will probably take us hundreds more to figure out that murdering billions of animals is bad for example. We might never figure out how to prevent poverty, inequality, racism, imperialism, colonialism and war. We probably make earth uninhabitable way before then anyhow.
I can see why aliens want to isolate and not want to talk to us. Not because of the calendar system we use, but because of what it represents.
yetihehe · 3 years ago
> The aliens may have gone through similar steps in their evolution of their civilization so they probably know what it means if a post-interstellar species still uses a gods birthday to count time.
Or they might feel that using merely having gods is an obvious sign that we are unsuitable to be included in galactic community.
https://www.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/prose/text/think...
rendall · 3 years ago
I'm also not a fan of the "alien-who-is-really-the-writer has an objectively superior and judgmental perspective" genre, even when it's trying to be funny. Some movies: K-PAX was one, Powder, another.
neuronic · 3 years ago
It's just a rhetorical mechanism to deliver critique in a format that is entertaining and not too dry.
rendall · 3 years ago
It's invariably too "on the nose" for my tastes
Swenrekcah · 3 years ago
Very entertaining read. The earthling says at one point (for comedic effect probably) that they don’t know why people used to like to count in dozens. I didn’t understand myself until someone explained to me that it makes dividing pay between a group of workers much easier.
You pay 12 coins for a job, very simple to divide between a team of two, three, four, six or twelve.
octobus2021 · 3 years ago
Yep, one of the reasons US construction industry sticks to feet and inches instead of using decimal system.
timbit42 · 3 years ago
The decimal system should have been the dozenal system but good luck getting people to switch from decimal to dozenal.
octobus2021 · 3 years ago
I don't know how many fingers you have, but decimal system makes more sense to me...
latexr · 3 years ago
You can count to twelve on your hands just as easily. And that’s per hand. Numberphile explains: https://youtu.be/U6xJfP7-HCc?t=500
davchana · 3 years ago
Since childhood, I have always counted 16 on 4 fingers. Top of finger tip as 1, then the dark lines between knuckles, on inside side of finger as 2,3,4. After 16, I continue with 17 on first finger again, but left hand has now 1 touched by my thumb. Technically its 16x16 numbers.
timbit42 · 3 years ago
Since I lost 4 in the accident, I have 12 left.
InCityDreams · 3 years ago
Because you get paid in coins and have to divide them in 2, 3, 4, 6'z?
*but i do now understand the use of a thru'ppenny bit.
ManuelKiessling · 3 years ago
Mh, but isn’t the base 12 system coming from the fact that people used to count stuff with their thumb, using the 3 sections of the other 4 fingers?
felipeerias · 3 years ago
Furthermore, you can count up to 12 using the fingers of just one hand: you just place the tip of your thumb on each of the other finger's phalanges.
With two hands, you can use this method to count up to 144 (a "gross" in English): one hand counts individual items, the other counts dozens.
coin · 3 years ago
> we further subdivide the months into 'weeks'
Nope, we they are divided into days
EGreg · 3 years ago
My reply: https://twitter.com/gregmozart/status/1574139558102716416?s=...
Previously there were 10?
The Hebrew calendar always used 12 months I think. What are you referring to, and where is your evidence? Happy Rosh HaShana!
mcv · 3 years ago
Yeah, that sounds like a mistake by the tweeter. As far as I know there have always been 12 months, but the start of the year got moved from March to January at some point.
rsynnott · 3 years ago
The historic Roman year (the one _before_ the one that Caesar replaced) had 10 months, which is probably where that comes from.
Izkata · 3 years ago
Yeah, what I'd learned as a kid was that Julius and Augustus inserted themselves in the middle to turn it from 10 to 12 months, which is why the latter months are named wrong, but comments up above are saying they just renamed months.
rsynnott · 3 years ago
That’s confusing a few separate things. There was (supposedly; we only know about it from late Republic writers) a system with ten months, _then_ a system with 12 months where the year started in March (so the numbering made sense), then at some point the year switched to starting in January, then Julius Caesar’s system, also with 12 months.
Later on (during Augustus’s rule, I think), Quintilis and Sextilis became July and August, but by that time they were _already_ confusingly named.
comeonbro · 3 years ago
I didn't appreciate until recently that the calendar we live by today was personally designed by Julius Caesar.
Like not by some forgotten technocrats incidentally during his time, but Julius Caesar himself as a subject matter expert, as a side-project. With consultation, certainly, but by his initiative, from long-standing engagement with the problem in one of his early jobs from long before he was a main character of the Roman story.
Digestable and entertaining (fragment of a) video on the topic:
superjan · 3 years ago
And in that calender, February is the last month, which makes it the logical month for adjusting leap years.
jffry · 3 years ago
And likewise, September is the 7th month, October the 8th, etc etc
lolinder · 3 years ago
It looks like there's a legend that this was the case, but January has been the first month of the year through all of recorded history, and Julius Caesar's version was no different.
EDIT: Because there's a lot of confusion in several replies I thought I'd clarify: February was the second month in Julius Caesar's calendar. Romans in the Republic describe the month as being at some point the last month in the calendar, but we don't have any direct record of that. That's what I mean when I refer to it as a legend: it's a story that later Romans tell about their distant past. It is probably accurate but the sources are too far removed from the actual event to be treated as primary sources.
This is true of Roman history in general: any story that dates back to the kings should be treated as a legend that Romans told about their past. It may have elements of the truth, but shouldn't be taken as firm fact. This particular legend has a lot of evidence going for it, but that doesn't make it inaccurate to refer to it as a legend.
Jap2-0 · 3 years ago
That article seems to state the opposite?
lolinder · 3 years ago
> In the oldest Roman calendar, which the Romans believed to have been instituted by their legendary founder Romulus, March was the first month, and the calendar year had only ten months in all. Ianuarius and Februarius were supposed to have been added by Numa Pompilius, the second king of Rome, originally at the end of the year. It is unclear when the Romans reset the course of the year so that January and February came first.
Most of what we know about pre-republican Rome is from oral tradition, not actual records. So if by the time of the Republic February was the second month of the year, it was the second month of the year through all of recorded Roman history.
kgwgk · 3 years ago
Maybe Quintilis, Sextilis, September, October, November and December were the seventh, eight, ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth months of the year through all of the “recorded Roman history”. But it seems well accepted that they were once the fifth, sixth, seventh, eight, ninth and tenth months of the year.
lolinder · 3 years ago
In retrospect, I probably shouldn't have referred to it as a legend. That seems to have negative connotations for most people that I didn't mean to convey.
I really don't doubt the authenticity of the story, I mainly was trying to indicate that we don't know when the change occurred but it certainly happened a long time before Caesar: by his day, the change was an oral tradition whose full story was lost in the very distant past.
coldtea · 3 years ago
>That seems to have negative connotations for most people that I didn't mean to convey.
Not just "for most". It has negative connotations (of the kind reffered to here) for all people.
"Legend" connotes "didn't take place".
lolinder · 3 years ago
I'm a person, and legend does not have that connotation for me, it means "it was only handed down orally so we can't be sure". I'm sure my idiolect is unusual in that regard, but I stand by my "for most people".
IncRnd · 3 years ago
A legend is a traditional story sometimes regarded as historical but isn't authenticated. You are saying that a legend is a story that is believed to be false. That is exactly opposite from the meaning of the word and is NOT something believed by "all people."
jfk13 · 3 years ago
That article says "it is unclear when the Romans reset the course of the year so that January and February came first", but doesn't actually deny that the year formerly ended with February.
See for example p.187 of https://ryanfb.github.io/loebolus-data/L333.pdf for a 1st century BC reference to it:
> The Terminalia 'Festival of Terminus,' because this day is set as the last day of the year; for the twelfth month was February, and when the extra month is inserted the last five days are taken off the twelfth month.
lolinder · 3 years ago
To be clear, I'm not denying that it was the first month at some point. It wasn't when Caesar designed his calendar, and we don't have a record of it changing. I refer to it as a legend not to indicate that it isn't true but to indicate that the only sources we have are referring to it as changing sometime in the distant past.
adrian_b · 3 years ago
It is very likely that at its origin the Roman year started on the spring equinox.
That is why March was the first month and February was the last Month.
However, the astronomical rule was not followed later, and due to the inconsistent length of the year the position of the spring equinox had drifted from the 1st of March to around the 25th of March by the time of Julius Caesar.
The present position of the spring equinox around the 20th of March does not correspond to its position at the introduction of the Julian calendar, but to its position around the time of the First Council of Nicaea (AD 325).
kevin_thibedeau · 3 years ago
No it hasn't. Your link even points out that Jan and Feb were added to a 10 month calendar starting with March. Moreover, various cultures notionally observing the Julian calendar have assigned varying dates to the start of the year throughout history.
lolinder · 3 years ago
It says that later Romans said that they started with the 10-month calendar and that the second king added 2 months, and that at some point those two months migrated to the front.
The context that I did not include in my original comment and should have is that everything from Rome in the time of the kings is considered to be legend. There are likely things that are rooted in fact, and this story has strong evidence for it, but the number and order of months has not changed in recorded Roman history, we only have indications from later Romans that they believed it changed at some point in the past.
My main point was that Caesar did not have February as the last month, he used the same order as his contemporaries and as we do.
behnamoh · 3 years ago
As a Persian, I always found the Gregorian calendar weird. In Iran and some other countries, Jalali calendar is used which is much more straightforward:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jalali_calendar
The Iranian calendar (also known as Persian calendar or the Jalaali Calendar)
is a solar calendar currently used in Iran and Afghanistan. It is
observation-based, rather than rule-based, beginning each year on the vernal
equinox as precisely determined by astronomical observations from Tehran.
There are 12 months. The first 6 have 31 days and the rest have 30 days, except the last month which is 29 days. Every 4 years, it's a leap year and the last month becomes also 30 days.It's also precisely set to follow seasons. For example, the first day of Fall is actually the first day of "Mehr" (the 7th month). For some reason, the Gregorian calendar has it on Sep. 22.
walrus01 · 3 years ago
For what it's worth many early European cultures also considered the start of the year to be at the start of spring, generally the same idea as Nowruz, which is where we got Easter from as a conglomeration of "pagan" rituals and Christian religion. Unfortunately we ended up with this weird Dec. 31st at the end of a year in the middle of winter which doesn't make any logical sense.
BuckRogers · 3 years ago
There’s more similarities than just that. Iran was founded by Indo-Europeans.
behnamoh · 3 years ago
Many similarities in languages too. Persian (Farsi) has the same root as some European languages (and should not be confused with Arabic, which is totally different than both).
In Persian | In English
mädar | mother
barädar | brother
dokhtar | daughter
pedar | father
bad | bad
...BuckRogers · 3 years ago
I’m familiar. It is fascinating. Same with Sanskrit. I don’t know if we’re all descended from the same people exactly, or if the Indo Europeans were just an extremely successful core group with a culture that all of us adopted as the natives wherever they spread to. But they certainly had a successful culture. Iran should really be an ally with the western democracies. Those people are actually pretty advanced and modern, considering where they are placed in the world.
behnamoh · 3 years ago
I say that to my American and European friends, that Iranians have a lot more in common with them than with the rest of the middle east. There are exceptions, of course, but the general public is really well educated, open minded, and leaning towards Western values and culture.
Too bad that the country has received such a negative reputation over the past 4 decades due to its (non-Iranian) regime.
BuckRogers · 3 years ago
I’m American and that’s my perspective. I can’t be the only one. I never even understood why Iran and the US were at odds. Seems entirely based on politics/elites. From what I see, Iranians would be my first pick as allies in the region. We certainly chose poorly with Saudi Arabia.
Slava_Propanei · 3 years ago
Non-Western values and culture are a great portion of why we need Iran. A shelter from and an antidote to global liberal hegemony.
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
> It's also precisely set to follow seasons. For example, the first day of Fall is actually the first day of "Mehr" (the 7th month). For some reason, the Gregorian calendar has it on Sep. 22.
This doesn't really work; the first day of Fall differs from place to place according to the specifics of the local climate.
tomtomistaken · 3 years ago
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
Why would that be considered the first day of Fall? Even taking a purely astronomical perspective, the autumnal equinox would be the center of Fall, not the beginning.
samatman · 3 years ago
As a not-at-all neutral observation, you post an enormous amount, are obnoxious in your confidence, and frequently wrong.
bawolff · 3 years ago
This seems a bit mean, especially given its a pretty natural question as to why the equinox is considered start of fall instead of midautumn (in certain regions)
Edit: i take it back.
bawolff · 3 years ago
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
Yes, from a seasonal perspective, the timing of a season varies idiosyncratically from place to place. That was the first thing I said. Why would you then want to locate the beginning of Fall on the equinox?
Quoting from your link:
> seasonal lag is not "seasonally symmetric"; that is, the period between the winter solstice and thermal midwinter (coldest time) is not the same as between the summer solstice and thermal midsummer (hottest time).
> In mid-latitude continental climates, [seasonal lag] is approximately 20–25 days in winter and 25–35 days in summer.
> there is no meteorological reason for designating these dates as the first days of their respective seasons.
bawolff · 3 years ago
You asked why it is traditionally known as that, and i answered.
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
Not only did I not ask that, I don't believe that the equinox is traditionally known as the beginning of autumn. Traditional terminology always marks the solstices and equinoxes as the middle of the season in which they occur, because that is obviously the way seasons work. Compare Western European "Midsummer" [the solstice] or Chinese 立秋 ["beginning of Fall", August 8; compare to the equinox on September 23, or to the "Mid-Autumn Festival" 中秋节, fixed to the full moon, but generally around late September].
The equinoxes and the solstices are marked on modern calendars as the beginning of their respective seasons, but I have never heard anyone attempt to justify that. I tend to assume it's the result of the calendar-buying population not having any reason to care what season it currently is.
But even among modern calendar-buying people, I believe they think of big snowdrifts as something that happens in winter, not something that happens in late fall and continues through winter. And the calendar doesn't agree with that.
GoblinSlayer · 3 years ago
So is it astronomical season or weather season? Weather varies between locations.
mcv · 3 years ago
Spring and autumn start on the equinox, summer and winter on the solstices. Though it's true they tend to be called "mid summer" and "mid winter" day. It's certainly weird.
We also tend to associate summer with days getting longer and winter with days (the period between sunrise and sunset) getting shorter, but the opposite is true: in summer, which is the period from about 21 June to 23 September, days are getting shorter, whereas in winter, between 21 December and 21 March, days are getting longer. Astronomical winter starts on the shortest day, and astronomical summer on the longest day.
I guess we're just eternally confused about calendars. And who can blame us?
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
> Astronomical winter starts on the shortest day, and astronomical summer on the longest day.
This is a convention used only by modern calendars. Astronomers have no opinion on when particular seasons occur. They care about things like when stars rise above or sink below the horizon. But they don't use the change in the sky to determine when winter occurs. People notice that winter occurs around the same time every year, and they associate whatever the sky is doing at that time with the beginning of winter.
As you already note, the solstices are called "midsummer" and "midwinter". That is because they are traditionally identified as the middle of summer and the middle of winter. Why do you believe that they are the beginning instead?
mcv · 3 years ago
"Believe"? It's the common definition. Belief has nothing to do with it.
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
That doesn't come close to being true. Compare the Cambridge dictionary's "common definition":
> [summer] the season of the year between spring and autumn when the weather is warmest, lasting from June to September north of the equator and from December to March south of the equator
Wikipedia:
> Summer is the hottest of the four temperate seasons, occurring after spring and before autumn. At or centred on the summer solstice, the earliest sunrise and latest sunset occurs, daylight hours are longest and dark hours are shortest, with day length decreasing as the season progresses after the solstice. The date of the beginning of summer varies according to climate, tradition, and culture.
> From an astronomical view, the equinoxes and solstices would be the middle of the respective seasons, but sometimes astronomical summer is defined as starting at the solstice, the time of maximal insolation, often identified with the 21st day of June or December. By solar reckoning, summer instead starts on May Day and the summer solstice is Midsummer.
mcv · 3 years ago
It "doesn't come close to being true", so you post stuff that confirms what I said?
Only your last sentence presents an alternate definition, the rest confirms it or is close to it. And the astronomical definition is not an uncommon one.
I think you need to reread what I wrote and what you wrote.
collinmanderson · 3 years ago
Technically days get longer (hours of daylight) during the winter and shorter during the summer.
hoseja · 3 years ago
Bruh.
You can't really define seasons with day-precision based on weather or climate.
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
You can't define seasons with day precision based on anything.
hnuser123456 · 3 years ago
1/4 of the time it takes for earth to cross a line between the sun and a particular feature of the CMB, granted the CMB feature would be arbitrary
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
That would not match anyone's idea of what a season was. For example, it makes it impossible to say "as you go farther north, the winter gets longer and the summer gets shorter".
geraneum · 3 years ago
That actually works pretty well and has worked well for thousands of years for what it was designed to do. The calendar should not necessarily follow the local climate of every region, as that can vary each year and throughout the time. They had to fix a reference point for seasons, and they have chosen the Equinox. This is a sensible reference point (see refs). But also it could be anything else as long as it's measurable and verifiable independently and does not change based on location.
The same works for the clocks. People in Sweden still use the same 24-hour clock, even though they have vastly different daylight conditions in different seasons.
The Persian calendar is actually our most precise [1] calendars to date, and it owes its precision to tying the calendar to astronomical seasons [2].
[1] https://www.timeanddate.com/date/perfect-calendar.html [2] https://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/persian-calendar.html
LudwigNagasena · 3 years ago
Calendar seasons are mainly used to talk about the weather. Using Equinox as a fixed reference point is not any more precise than using meteorological convention wrt thermal seasons.
geraneum · 3 years ago
Here is what Equinox means and how it's related to weather in general https://www.weather.gov/lmk/seasons
> Using Equinox as a fixed reference point and a is not any more precise than using meteorological convention wrt thermal seasons
Well, no. What meteorological convention? That's a pretty broad term. We are talking about calendars, not a general weather forecast system, as I was comparing Persian calendar with other calendars.
With Equinox, you get a good indication of weather conditions for a wide geography while having a precise reference point to design a calendar which can be used for other equally important purposes.
P.S. While I was thinking about what you wrote, I wondered how these things were argued and arranged in ancient times and what did they think or say considering what they had to come up with affects a significant portion of the civilized world and trade between nations.
2dvisio · 3 years ago
Yes. My partner is Iranian and their birthday is out of sync (earlier) every leap year. We “discovered” that the one first year it happen to us when suddenly received birthday wishes by all their Iranian network the day “before” the Gregorian calendar birthday.
LudwigNagasena · 3 years ago
> For example, the first day of Fall is actually the first day of "Mehr" (the 7th month). For some reason, the Gregorian calendar has it on Sep. 22.
That’s just a convention. In Russia we use “meteorological” convention, for example, and so each season starts on the 1st of some month (March, June, September, December). It is off from the astronomical convention by ≈20 days and it is off from reality by whatever depending on your location and your feelings on what constitutes seasons.
fluoridation · 3 years ago
The Julian calendar, which the Gregorian is a revision of, was designed precisely so that societies didn't need a public servant dedicated to keeping the calendar up to date.
>For example, the first day of Fall is actually the first day of "Mehr" (the 7th month). For some reason, the Gregorian calendar has it on Sep. 22.
The particular locations of the equinoxes and solstices on the calendar isn't as important as keeping them more or less in the same places as time goes on.
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
> but January has been the first month of the year through all of recorded history
Are you kidding? Not only are September through December literally named "Month 7" through "Month 10", but the year began in late March as recently as AD 1751. That is not a period where we're suffering from a lack of recorded history.
nicoburns · 3 years ago
September through December being months 7 to 10 are because Julius Caesar (July) and Augustus Caesar (August) added months named after themselves after they were named.
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
No, that never happened. They renamed the existing months "5" and "6".
nicoburns · 3 years ago
Huh, TIL
lolinder · 3 years ago
True enough, my mistake! I was only looking at the Roman time period and didn't realize that the calendar shifted back to starting in March during the Christian era. That's really interesting to learn!
My main point is still the same: Caesar's calendar started in January and he was following the order that was current in his day. We do not know when the switch from March to January occurred. There are multiple stories about the switch (the supposed dates range from 750 BC to 153 BC), and there are legends of a 10-month calendar that didn't include January and February at all, but there are no extant contemporary records describing the switch.
adrian_b · 3 years ago
The legends about the 10 month calendar are almost certainly a very late invention, which appeared as an attempt to explain why e.g. December is the 12th month.
It is likely that at its conception all the months of the Roman calendar were numbered, but some time later the months January to June were given names corresponding to important religious festivals, which were scheduled during those months.
thaumasiotes · 3 years ago
> but there are no extant contemporary records describing the switch.
We have something of a philosophical disagreement; I would argue that the names of the months themselves constitute a contemporary record describing the switch. It doesn't tell us when the switch occurred, but it tells us very clearly that the switch occurred.
It is true that the record might be accidentally or deliberately falsified; perhaps the months were originally named after unrelated concepts and the names got revised into their numerical forms over time. But a formal history suffers from exactly the same problem, and it still gets to be called a "record"; I don't see why we would consider the fact that our ninth month is named "Month Seven" not to be a record of a shift in the beginning of the year [or rather, in the beginning of the sequence of months].
gerdesj · 3 years ago
He didn't just throw dice or march in, see what's what and grab the locals by the nadgers.
JC was quite a chap and of course why its called the Julian Calendar. Many other calendars are available. Kalends is the source of the name for calendar and the Roman day of month counting is pretty involved - http://www.polysyllabic.com/?q=calhistory/earlier/roman/kale... Kalends, nones and ides.
JS died on the ides of March ...
mattl · 3 years ago
JS died how?
gerdesj · 3 years ago
Et tu Brute? He was murdered in the Senate.
The cut and thrust of political discussion was rather more forthright back then.
To be fair, we've chopped off the heads of King Charles hereabouts. I'm sure III has nothing to worry about.
djbusby · 3 years ago
Typo, it's JC
chaorace · 3 years ago
Ah, the one the epoch is based on?
dijit · 3 years ago
I thought that was Linus Torvalds.
otikik · 3 years ago
React
j-bos · 3 years ago
Well worth the watch, also shows that Ceasar's main character arc was bossted by his calendar knowledge and authority.
permo-w · 3 years ago
I’m unsure how commonly known this is, but also note that July and August are named after Julius Caesar and Emperor Augustus
AmericanChopper · 3 years ago
If Caesar designed the calendar, how did he get a month in there named after something that hadn’t happened yet? When Caesar died Augustus’ name was Octavian, and Rome hadn’t had an emperor yet…
Pigalowda · 3 years ago
Are you messing around?
Octavius became Julius Caesar after he was adopted. And also later he was given the honorable designation by the senate and called Augustus. That’s not his name its one of his honors.
Octavian is essentially a past tense of his name and he never truly went by that. It’s a name used by historians.
kgwgk · 3 years ago
> Octavius became Julius Caesar after he was adopted.
Gaius Julius Caesar
karatinversion · 3 years ago
At the time of the calendar reform, the months that are now called July and August were called Quintilis and Sextilis. The Julian calendar came into use on January 1, 45 BC. July was renamed in 44 BC (the year of Caesar’s assassination), and August in 8 BC.
coldtea · 3 years ago
Designing the calendar does mean "give a name to every month forever".
You could also (a) just design the mechanics of the calendars (leap days, duration of months, etc), but keep the month names the same, or (b) change names too, which could get renamed again later.
fsckboy · 3 years ago
> the calendar we live by today was personally designed by Julius Caesar
Pope Gregory has entered the chat
there have been some changes to the calendar since Caesar, especially when people went to bed Thursday 4 October 1582 and woke up on Friday 15 October 1582, and thereafter there were no more leap years on centuries except every 400 years.
https://www.onthisday.com/articles/gregory-conquers-julius-c...
buchoo · 3 years ago
One fun historical tidbit is that St Teresa of Ávila died on the night of the 4th to the 15th of October, 1582.
dolmen · 3 years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teresa_of_%C3%81vila#Last_days
ithkuil · 3 years ago
People mostly remember Caesar as a ruler, however in 63 BC (5 years before the Gallic wars) Caeser managed to get himself elected as Pontifex Maximus (chief high priest).
Adjusting the calendar was as part of the duties of the Pontifex Maximus. They decided public holidays and they decided whether to add an "intercalary month" (at the end of February which used to be the last month).
There are many interesting things to say about this but since this is hacker news I'm going ro focus on one:
Caesar was away campaigning a lot and the Pontifex could adjust the calendar only while physically in Rome. So many years went by without calendar fixes.
After having benefited from the confusion and the edge he had by understanding the calendar (like knowing he could safely cross the Adriatic when his opponent assumed that crossing it that given month was a bad luck) he decided to fix the calendar so that it doesn't require a human in the loop.
In a way, he automated himself out of his job.
throw1234651234 · 3 years ago
Completely off-topic, but someone on HN posted a theory that Caesar let himself be killed, because he was afraid that he wasn't able to keep up his stellar reputation as winning everything as he got older. Was one of the few "eye-openers" for me, since as you get older, nothing is really "new" or "interesting". If the parent post turns out to be true, it goes on that list. Will research after work.
tornato7 · 3 years ago
At least a dozen engineers read this and decided to name their new microservice "Pontifex"
EmilioMartinez · 3 years ago
Imagine being so powerful that your enemies await your calendar adjustments
ajaimk · 3 years ago
The 12 makes sense for being divisible by 3 and 4. 60 does the same but also for 5.
The rest is chaos.
timbit42 · 3 years ago
If we switch to dozenal, we can switch metric to being dozenal based and we won't need decimal time.
avgcorrection · 3 years ago
> "nah, we call them AM and PM"
Not a human-universal practice.
seer-zig · 3 years ago
This is mainly tailored toward the Gregorian/Solar calendar. We don't have leap years in Hijri.
umanwizard · 3 years ago
The story begins with aliens landing in New Jersey, and describes the calendar most commonly used there.
davchana · 3 years ago
In Hinduism, there is a whole extra month after few years, kind of like December Bad. It is thought to not to do anything special in this month because its a bad month, labeled as like creature who lives under earth.
irrational · 3 years ago
All these things have a historical basis. Are we assuming aliens don’t have cultural things from their own history?
> I'm not sure, really.
This right here. All of these things have reasons that made logical sense at the time. The speaker is just ignorant of history.
> so you switch to base-10 at last
At last? Are we assuming the aliens have ten fingers?
> Your months are named, not numbered?
Why would aliens not name things?
> yeah, it's Monday or Sunday.
Or Friday.
The human should explain lunar calendars next.
seba_dos1 · 3 years ago
Actually, it would be like:
- Why is this so weird?
- Eh, historical reasons. Legacy framework retained due to inertia, don't think too much about it.
- Yeah, makes sense.
modeless · 3 years ago
"There's 24 hours, 60 minutes, 60 seconds" - except sometimes when there are 25 hours, or 23! Because it's too hard to ask people to change their schedules, so we change the time instead. And of course we don't add or remove those hours at the beginning or end of the day, so we never actually have an hour 25, we just repeat one of the middle hours instead. And then, independently, sometimes there are 61 seconds, or 59. And don't get me started on time zones...
thfuran · 3 years ago
>sometimes there are 61 seconds, or 59
Isn't one of those still just a theoretical possibility? I think all leap seconds so far have been in the same direction.
modeless · 3 years ago
So far. But it's definitely still possible. Earth's rotation has been speeding up lately. https://www.timeanddate.com/news/astronomy/shortest-day-2022
bluejekyll · 3 years ago
“Hasn’t anyone ever tried to fix this?”, “yes, there was the International Fixed Calendar: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Fixed_Calendar..., “and?”, “well, only one company used it and that company eventually lost relevance and was never able to get the broader society to use it”.
BlackLotus89 · 3 years ago
They forgot summer- and wintertime, and leap seconds.
Oh and afaik only some english speaking countries use AM/PM, the rest of the world uses the 24h based system doesn't it?
davchana · 3 years ago
Its not some countries. Every country British had ruled uses 12h for day to day life; & 24 for military speak & railway time tables display board. & British ruled a lot of countries.
BlackLotus89 · 3 years ago
For everyone who is interested here is a nice map https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/24-hour_clock#/media/File:12_2... from the wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12-hour_clock
wazoox · 3 years ago
In fact all of these points have valid reasons which simply reflect some form of cruft. For instance, until Caesar February was the last month of the year, so there was an intercalation of a month of varying length every two years(which made more sense). Also, the months September, October, November, December actually were the 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th months of the year. And all the months were 30 days (actually alternatively 29 and 31 days), but the mensis intercalaris which was either 22 or 23 days.
Julius Caesar changed this because during the Civil wars of the late Republic, many times there was no Great Pontiff to do the calculations, so the additional month were left out a few times and the calendar was really getting out of sync. He changed the beginning of the year from the Spring solstice to January 1st, because that was the day of the consular election (and the consuls were elected for one year, so that made more sense as the years were named from the consuls that were elected).
As for the birth of Jesus, we now know that it must be off by a few years. But originally, it was just the best guess they could come with; once it was found that Jesus actually wasn't born when initially thought, well, tough luck, it simply stayed as it was because it was too difficult to change after centuries of counting this way already.
Regarding the use of base 60 for time, it made sense because it allows matching the course of the Sun and the Moon across the year (about 360 days), across the month (lunar month is 29.5 days) and the day. That's also why we cut circles in 360°: to allow for easy astronomical calculation (by approximating the year to 360 days, the lunation to 30 days), and splitting the day and night into 12 hours.
Notice that until the invention of mechanical clocks, there was 12 hours a day and 12 hours a night, therefore hours were of varying length depending upon seasons, but OTOH using a sundial was dead simple -- which made sense when you had sundials, but no clocks...
fkarg · 3 years ago
Isn't there also additional calendars in at least Japanese and Chinese culture?
needle0 · 3 years ago
Japan uses the Western calendar pretty much as-is. One addition is the Japanese gengou system of year/era counting, which resets with a new era name every time a new emperor is enthroned (at least in recent years). Most people are aware of and use both the Western and Japanese methods of year counting, though.
The last reset was in May 1st 2019, when Heisei year 31 switched to Reiwa year 1. (Yes, a single year can have two era-based names since the switch doesn't necessarily occur on New Year's Day. Annoying.) It is now Reiwa 4.
strenholme · 3 years ago
Dealing with calendars can be pretty difficult. Since I recently wrote a script in Lua to be my personal assistant, processing calendars, todo lists, mailing lists, etc., here’s a Lua form of the code to calculate the day of week. This is accurate for any Georgian date:
-- Calculate the day of the week
-- Input: year, month, day (e.g. 2022,9,16)
-- Output: day of week (0 = Sunday, 6 = Saturday)
function dayOfWeek(year, month, day)
-- Tomohiko Sakamoto algorithm
local monthX = {0, 3, 2, 5, 0, 3, 5, 1, 4, 6, 2, 4}
if month < 3 then year = year - 1 end
local yearX = (year + math.floor(year / 4) - math.floor(year / 100) +
math.floor(year / 400))
local out = yearX + monthX[month] + day
out = out % 7
return out
endzazaulola · 3 years ago
In C-lang the algorithm is more mysterious:
dow(m,d,y) { y-=m<3; return(y+y/4-y/100+y/400+"-bed=pen+mad."[m]+d)%7; }themagician · 3 years ago
This would make for fantastic radio drama. For some reason I can imagine the voice of John Cleese as either the Alien or the Human.
antognini · 3 years ago
A fun bit of trivia is that it wasn't until the middle of the 18th century that it became standard in Europe to start the new year on January 1. Up until that point many regions used March 25 as the date of the New Year. So, for example the day March 24, 1715 would have been followed by March 25, 1716.
March 25 was the Feast of the Annunciation whereas January 1 was the Feast of the Circumcision, so the two dating methods were called Annunciation Style and Circumcision Style.
Obviously this created some ambiguity since the Circumcision Style date March 24, 1716 would be rendered March 24, 1715 when written Annunciation Style. Around the time of the transition to Annunciation Style dating in Britain you actually see people writing both dates together to avoid confusion, usually with the Circumcision Style date below the Annunciation Style date. (You can see an example here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/Memorial...)
kadonoishi · 3 years ago
Oh, is that why Tolkien had Frodo throw the Ring in the Fire on March 25? And then King Elessar made that day the first day of the New Year. And the tradition held on until the 18th century. Huh.
tooltower · 3 years ago
Some call it a "tradition".
Some call it "backwards compatibility".
rufus_foreman · 3 years ago
Hopefully no one tells them about java.util.Date.
timoth3y · 3 years ago
An interesting aside the Cotsworth Calendar is such an obvious approach to the months problem it makes me wonder why it was not adopted in the first place.
We have 13 months of 28 days each. The 9th is always a Monday the 19th is always a Thursday. "Two months from now" always means the same thing and always means the same number of days.
The extra day is New Years Day. It's a holiday and does not belong to any month - or belongs to it's own month if you prefer. On Leap Years there are two of these days.
ivlad · 3 years ago
13 is prime and thus quarterly planning gets complicated. Quarterly planning is there because of the seasons and agriculture.
nmz · 3 years ago
Agriculture for who though? There's plenty of places where there aren't 4 seasons.
freetime2 · 3 years ago
How about the fact that 10/11/12 can variously refer to October 11, 2012, November 10, 2012, or November 12, 2010 - depending on what country you are in?
Zekio · 3 years ago
sometimes more than one of them in the same country depending on whether people use the old format or the "new" official format https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_notation_in_Denm... and isn't even consistent in delimiters
davchana · 3 years ago
& sometimes even in same country but depending on who is using it. In USA, Social Security will use like mm/dd/yyyy. Passport will have dd MMM YYYY. Immigration documents from USCIS will have mmddyy. Some state documents will have mm-dd-yy
romanhn · 3 years ago
And just to make sure the aliens lose whatever shred of confidence they might still have in human civilisation, we should introduce them to time zones: https://youtu.be/-5wpm-gesOY. My favorite video on the topic.
_Algernon_ · 3 years ago
Why the presupposition that these aliens are more rational than us? Presumably they would be just as vulnerable to their evolved behaviour and inertia of historical decision making as we are.
needle0 · 3 years ago
Came to say this. They operate under the same rules of physics; it should just be as likely that their planetary motions and cultural history will also force them into weird counting systems.
ajuc · 3 years ago
So, for comparison - in Poland we use
- 24 hour clock
- days of the week are called "after not working day", "second day", "middle day", "fourth day", "fifth day", "sabbath", "not working day"
- months are mostly named from the agricultural/weather phenomena "wood cutting month", "strong cold month", "Mars month", "flowers month", "Mai month", "red pigment larvae month", "linden trees month", "sickle month", "heather month", "chaff month", "falling leaves month", "frozen ground month"
Dates are written dd-mm-yyyy or yyyy-mm-dd (less often).
The rest is as bad as in USA.
tasuki · 3 years ago
> "second day"
Wtorek? That... does not appear to have "dwa" or anything similar in it. Please ELIC (explain like I'm Czech (actually am, tho lived in Poland for a bit))
ursusmaritimus · 3 years ago
There is an old Slavic word "vtorý" for "second" (not sure about spelling, but it is documented for example in old church Slavonic). Russian still uses "vtoroj" for "second". Several other Slavic languages have a word for Tuesday based on this root, even though their usual word for "second" follows a systematic derivation based on "dva" (two). Examples includes Czech and Slovak ("úterý" for Tuesday in both) and Polish ("wtorek").
Void_ · 3 years ago
You’d think old Church Slavonic to be an obscure language, but in my local church (in eastern Slovakia) you can attend a liturgy in this language twice a week.
ajuc · 3 years ago
Polish uses both "drugi" and "wtóry" for second (wtóry sounds old style, but most people understand it).
seba_dos1 · 3 years ago
It's also still retained in words that mean "repeat(ed)" - powtórzyć, powtórny.
ajuc · 3 years ago
Wtóry is oldstyle "second" in Polish.
Izkata · 3 years ago
"Middle day" isn't the middle day?
ajuc · 3 years ago
It's the middle day of the work week.
jmpeax · 3 years ago
> "Mars month"
I though marzec came from marznąć meaning "to freeze".
drdeca · 3 years ago
So you have the day before "seventh day" be called "fifth day"?
arrrg · 3 years ago
Week starts on Monday.
oldgradstudent · 3 years ago
"Sabbath" comes from Hebrew for rest or cessation, not from being the seventh day.
drdeca · 3 years ago
Oh! I thought it meant “seventh”! Thanks for the correction.
nothrowaways · 3 years ago
Looks cute.
seba_dos1 · 3 years ago
Roots of most of these words aren't instantly obvious even to Poles though - the meaning is there, but hidden behind layers of language evolution. I was aware of some of those roots already, but with some others I went like "huh, I guess this makes sense" only after reading the parent comment (although I'm not sure whether all of them are actually correct).
ajuc · 3 years ago
It was pretty obvious to me (except styczeń). But I did read Gołubiew's "Bolesław Chrobry" series that's written in Polish stylized to 10th century :)
cm2187 · 3 years ago
And we know our first reaction will be to cut interest rates.
NKosmatos · 3 years ago
Absolutely hilarious, can someone with artistic skills create a short film/animation based on this thread. Foone has given permission for derivative works ;-)
StingyJelly · 3 years ago
-- Well, sometimes the last minute of the year (or of the 6th month) has 61 seconds. Or 60 ever-so-slightly-longer "seconds". We haven't agreed yet.
rags2riches · 3 years ago
We used to end our days at sunset, because that's an observable event. Now we don't. That's why we have things like Christmas eve one date and Christmas day the next, when they really should be on the same date.
Thorentis · 3 years ago
> He's written about in a famous book but historical records are spotty
Don't want to start a religious debate, but it really annoys me when for some reason, multiple documents that were later compiled into a book are not historical documents, just because they were treated as religious texts by the church councils 300 years later. The Bible isn't a book that Christians all sat down and wrote. It's a collection of many different historical documents written by many different people.
miniwark · 3 years ago
Because it's about a books who explain than at last, two people can come back from death... days after it. Historians have doubts about this (and other weird events from this books) and therefore do not keep this specifics book as very credible sources. That said, no real historian actually doubt of the historical existence of the famous religious leader from the past.
rodric · 3 years ago
It is certainly a minority position, but some historians and scholars of religion do see reason for doubt: https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/21420
gurumeditations · 3 years ago
Biblical books are biased to assert Jesus existed as they describe him. There are no neutral historical records to prove he specifically existed. Besides, your “historical documents” contain competing narratives of events with each other, supernatural magic, and exist as part of a handpicked religious narrative that left other books out at that.
arcanus · 3 years ago
> There are no neutral historical records to prove he specifically existed.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
"Virtually all scholars of antiquity accept that Jesus was a historical figure"
For non-Christian sources, see: Tacitus, Suetonius, Josephus. It's virtually a certainty Jesus existed. Whether he was the 'son of God' is a very different discussion.
noslenwerdna · 3 years ago
There are many documents dating from ancient Rome (and earlier) that we don't consider historical because of their fantastic or religious nature. The set of documents you refer to are self-contradictory and describe supernatural events that no other author recorded.
Hell, historians take Herodotus with a grain of salt, and he was an actual historian.
vsareto · 3 years ago
Aliens: "yeah we know, our calendar system sucks too. we're really here for your species' best cable management pictures"
anotheryou · 3 years ago
He forgot to mention people also don't agree on the hour in the day and have oddly shaped "time zones".
nrvn · 3 years ago
wrt calendars there is one curious rational alternative.
13 months, 28 days each. Year day in the end not belonging to any month, leap day every leap year in the middle of the summer.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Fixed_Calendar
ivlad · 3 years ago
Quarterly planning is hard with 13 months
haswell · 3 years ago
This is what bothered me a bit too.
I half expected a punchline from the alien like "wow, your method of time keeping seems pretty simple compared to ours", hinting at the universal nature of evolution and gradual learning over time.
yen223 · 3 years ago
"At least your calendar doesn't get reset every time a comet flies past the sky" or something
0xbadcafebee · 3 years ago
These aliens must be either software developers or economists. Nobody else just assumes the world is logical and freaks out when it isn't...
aasasd · 3 years ago
I recently learned that in West the weekdays are named after Roman gods, but in English it's done by the way of Germanic gods. It's just that Romans, when visiting German tribes, interpreted local gods as Roman ones, simply with different names—as they did everywhere else too. So they brought the calendar with them, and explained that Odin is the same as Mercury, etc, and thus where Romance languages have ‘mercredi’ and such, English has wōdnesdæġ.
‘History of the English language’ is a splendid podcast.
hizxy · 3 years ago
I feel dumb because at some point I was extremely lost reading this thread.
IRP · 3 years ago
I would expect a alien calendar to be as complicated as ours. The calendar we use is the result of a long and rich history. Their would likely be as complicated, especially if there are part of a tree sun's system.
rsynnott · 3 years ago
We largely dumped the long and rich and annoying history for most things _other_ than time, though, with metrication. It's arguably surprising that time survived that.
rsynnott · 3 years ago
I feel like they missed an opportunity to get into date formats (big-endian vs little-endian vs American middle-endian)
remarkEon · 3 years ago
This entire Twitter thread (and most of the comments here) operate from some really weird assumptions about these aliens. As in, that there’s some agreed upon final answer for how everything from time to historical events should be logged, categorized, and accounted for in your little planet’s revolution around its Star. And that this regime is perfectly predictable without knowing anything about the life forms on the planet you’re observing.
Do people here really think this is reasonable, or realistic?
viraptor · 3 years ago
Not an agreed upon final answer, but a common not arbitrarily changing one - yes. You can easily see that in our history. Every time we have something slightly different in various cultures, we try to unify it and make it more consistent. Various units of measurement got pretty much unified when we needed to work together. Where we didn't, we got issues like losing the Mars orbiter because someone thought inches are still cute. We got time measurement unified and precisely defined, because we needed to synchronise time globally to enable precise GPS. Even on a cultural level, many countries went through some kind of unification/simplification of their language. (simplified Chinese, German orthography reform, Indonesian -> Malaysian, etc.) On a social level, we're so connected, that pointing at a random person today, I could guess they speak English, Spanish, or Chinese and not be wrong too often.
So yeah, once a society gets to travel to other life forms in the universe, you could expect their measurement of time is simplified and plain. Not that they don't understand the historical context of not having it that way though... but that would be far in the past. And it's funny to think of them going "oh, one of those again...", or even "ok, I've seen some weird stuff, but the mixed units on Earth are just disgusting". Probably the same reaction you'd get if you saw a programmer today copying the whole source to another folder with suffix "..._working_8". "oh $deity, I see why you're doing this, but please stop, this hurts my brain, I'll show you version control".
choko · 3 years ago
Why would we assume that alien visitors don't also have convuluted time measurement systems? It's seems likely any alien civilization would have followed a similar development trajectory as humans and would therefore also retain some anachronistic practices well into technological advancement.
econ101time · 3 years ago
This is how a 12 year old internet atheist sees the world. Advanced alien species is just a stand-in for the know-it-all author. Grow up. These things all have good historical reasons. And you don't turn society upside down just to get some nice parsimony in the calendar. We have a system that works and is remarkably accurate. Changing it would upset millions of social customs, accounting systems, computer systems, etc. The cost is unfathomable really. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
w10-1 · 3 years ago
Actually, what you're suggesting is that even if it is broken, it's too costly to fix. Then you should ask: costly compared to what?
If we fixed it, then innumerable generations after us would not have to deal with the problem.
The idea of "historical reason" and "social custom" assumes what it tries to prove, that the past is more important than the future.
The real problem is that we don't pay for the costs we impose on the future -- in bad calendars and environmental collapse from an overheated climate.
And because we don't pay, we don't have to care.
Indeed, "not caring" is taken as a badge of honor -- oppositional self-glorification through contempt for others.
Your point would be well-taken if it were well-intended and made with grace. The original post is a funny way to imagine accounting for the weight of history we lay upon those who come after us. It's a nice way to ask us to take some responsibility. Most everyone is willing to do what they can to make the world that little bit better. Indeed, I believe that those who came up with the original mistakes were trying to do better, and would welcome the corrections.
allenu · 3 years ago
> If we fixed it, then innumerable generations after us would not have to deal with the problem.
In day to day use, I'd argue the date and time system works perfectly fine. I know when my birthday is, I know when Christmas is, I know when my next dentist appointment is. I'm not confused because months have different days or that the day is broken into 24 hours.
Date and time systems for the most part are useful to us for social and cultural reasons. It works perfectly fine. It may seem "silly" that it's arbitrarily broken up into irregular months, but I'm not sure what we would gain if we used some new date system.
Yes, computing the difference between two days is complicated, but when we're dealing with date-time in computing, we generally do not use year/month/day in our computations, but instead use some epoch number and convert to localized formats as needed for display.
memoryleak · 3 years ago
There is some stuff, that can be fixed. I do not know the day of week (planning the next dentis appointment) without looking into a calendar. Often I have to think for a bit how many days a month has.
Joeri · 3 years ago
Indeed. Most of humanity still has to be born, so whatever we improve for future humans will be outweighed by whatever hardship it imposes on us, from a strictly rational point of view.
The trick is: how do we know we’re making things better, and how do we know they will stick.
brianpan · 3 years ago
It's a joke. But I think you're underestimating how malleable it is.
In the US, DST was changed in 2007. Many states have yearly discussions about it. The leap second was introduced in 1972 and many have been inserted since.
In Taiwan, years are often counted from the establishment of the ROC. https://www.todaytourism.com/travel-guides/Taiwanese-calenda...
It IS kind of broke and people are trying to "fix" it pretty often.
rvba · 3 years ago
The author also does not mention that there is no year 0.
So when Jesus was born, he was 0 years old, but it was already year 1. When Jesus was 20 it was allready year 21. Ignoring discussions if Jesus existed or not... lack of year zero is illogical.
Maybe they did it to not have year minus zero? Which also should be there tbh.
rsynnott · 3 years ago
To further complicate the issue, Jesus was born between 6 and 4BC, in any case. And in either winter or summer, depending on whether you happen to be Christian or Muslim.
lossolo · 3 years ago
If you want to explain someone why tech debt is bad show him this Twitter thread.
gniv · 3 years ago
Or rather if you want to explain to someone why tech debt is hard to fix show them this Twitter thread.
jasan_s · 3 years ago
haha
marcodiego · 3 years ago
Wait until we explain the year 2038 problem:
"Se we use an epoch because of a famous operating system"
"oh, that thing that runs computers right"
"yeah"
"and what base do you use the represent a date on you computers? 10, 12, 60?"
"2".jcalabro · 3 years ago
No mention of Australia? Blew my mind.
xen2xen1 · 3 years ago
I totally disagree with the article. Our calendar is 1000s of years of technical debt. Surely they will understand things built on top of other things for centuries and centuries..
denkmoon · 3 years ago
Poor foone does not like to be posted here.
yeuxardents · 3 years ago
Theyre made out of meat.
https://www.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/prose/text/think...
jaimex2 · 3 years ago
Were a species that prioritises backwards compatibility.
thescriptkiddie · 3 years ago
Please do not link to foone here
wolfv · 3 years ago
The 6*6*10 calendar is regular as possible. It has 6 months per year, 6 weeks per month, 10 days per week.
One month:
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59
60
Every month ends with a blank day (60), with the exception of the last month in non-leap years.
robofanatic · 3 years ago
Epic! reminds me of the conversation I have with every new hire, trying to explain our 20 year old system.
cafed00d · 3 years ago
Wait a minute: someday the aliens are going to land and we gotta explain our calendar, sure.
Or, _we_ don’t.
Someon—- pardon me —- _Something_ has to explain it to them.
That thing is gonna say: “yeah, the epoch is our earliest known ancestor’s origin. Those animals call it ‘Unix time’. We have a record of their hieroglyphic form: January 1 1970”duskwuff · 3 years ago
To riff on a bit from A Deepness in the Sky:
"We thought they were measuring from when their species first travelled to their homeworld's moon, but the point of reference is actually around fifteen megaseconds later. No idea why."
tanelpoder · 3 years ago
But what if the aliens don’t even have (don’t need) the concept of an integer, therefore no concept of prime numbers - and no need to split times of natural cycles into equal integer-sized intervals?
robofanatic · 3 years ago
Alien: so how do you write the date? year-month-day?
"nope, there are several variations but most popular are monthnumber-day-year and day-monthnumber-year. For example - 6-6-2022
"oh so you do use numbers for months."
"yeah sometimes"
"so in your example how do you know which one is day and which one is the month"
"depends upon which part of the earth you are standing on"
davchana · 3 years ago
& even in the same part aka USA, in day to day life & on state issued paperwork, ids, social security card, its 6-7-22 m-d-yy is June 7th, but on passport its dd MMM YYYY `07 JUN 2022`. Immigration documents issued by USCIS uses 06072022 mmddyyyy as June 07, 2022. So, not always the same sequence on same part of the earth.
genewitch · 3 years ago
This is far and away the most glaringly not-ok cultural thing we have leftover. I know there's an actual ISO for dates, but even if there weren't, if you use, oh, a file system, a spreadsheet, or even a filing cabinet, having the year, then the month, then the day, then the hour, minute, second, and so on makes everything sort correctly. We've been using computers for more than a generation at this point.
I get stressed any time i have to parse dates not in this format, usually for old emails, news articles, etc.
I think a huge sticking point is how most people write checks, Jun 6, 2022. Also the US postal system screws up the ordering in a way similar to writing things Jun 6, 2022. first the street number, then street, then subdivision (the building/apartment/department,) then city, then state. Then a zip code (which has the potential to be smaller than the street number, or larger than a city.
stevenfoster · 3 years ago
Chaldeans, Caesars, Christians. That about sums it up.
But then again if the Aliens land out in Central America they may believe our calendar has already ended and gift us a more logical one. :)
jerryzh · 3 years ago
You are very welcome to use Chinese Luna calendar instead, which is purely logical
labster · 3 years ago
If there are aliens out there who don’t have a strong concept of “historical reasons”, they’re not worth knowing, and likely not socially complex enough to present a threat to humans.
Honestly, even our DNA is full of historical reasons; why shouldn’t our society too?
mathiasrw · 3 years ago
Just gonna leave this here: https://theinternetsaysitstrue.com/2022/03/28/13-months-the-...
gmiller123456 · 3 years ago
"But enough about our calendar, let's hear about yours"
"Well, due to what makes a planet habitable, you won't be surprised that our planets year and day isn't incredibly different from yours..."
"But it took you millions of years to get here, why is your calendar based on a place you haven't been to in so long?"
"Well our species lifespan is about 100 years, so, actually, I was never there"
"But I guess you use that calendar to communicate back home?"
"Well, actually, the planet was swallowed by the star during its first red giant phase..."
"So your clock and calendar is based on a planet your separated from by generations, and which doesn't even exist anymore?"
"It does seem silly when you put it like that..."
"But it must be tiring writing out several digits for the year..."
"Oh, we solved that problem, we generally just write the last few digits, and it only becomes a problem every few generations"
"Cool, we just got rid of a system like that, but I'm sure it'll come back soon. Changing the subject, why do you have so many different computers?"
"Well, this is going to seem a bit silly, but we started using quantum computers a long time ago. Since there were 7 quantum states, each manufacturer had its own idea of which state should come first in memory."
Me: pats alien on back, "Dude, I feel you."
oxmane · 3 years ago
Definitely the best comment I read on this thread.
Not sure if this was the intention, but I read it as both recognizing the original post as funny, and yet recognizing that we (as in humanity) aren't "stupid" for having this complex system, but that's just how things develop.
Having both views live together is the best take on this.
reality_inspctr · 3 years ago
show hn: the clockchain and xpayz time - a proposal for an L1 style chain for time and time tracking.
https://www.seanmcdonald.xyz/p/the-clockchain-protocol-the-l...
elihu · 3 years ago
It could be worse. We might have to explain standard music notation.
Zenbit_UX · 3 years ago
This is what I'm going to use when the next time someone asks me to explain what tech debt is.
WirelessGigabit · 3 years ago
I wished people would refer to time I’m an unambiguous way. Sure your standard is 24h. I still gotta ask clarification when you tell me the meeting is at 8. Be specific. Having a 24h clock is useless id you say 8 in the evening.
gobins · 3 years ago
This reminds me of the Numberphile video on date and timezones. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5wpm-gesOY
I sometimes wonder how the code to handle all this would look like.
ck2 · 3 years ago
Calendars will make sense in comparison to billions of people blindly following (and dying for) religions thousands of years later that were invented before anyone knew anything about anything, no microscope, telescopes or even glasses.
db48x · 3 years ago
The Qeng Ho in Deepness in the Sky had the right idea. They traveled from planet to planet in STL ships, and counted time purely in seconds. They had to account for relativity, but nothing else.
A short task might take a kilosecond (about 16 minutes), a watch schedule might plan for activities covering a megasecond (close enough to a month for you and me), while a gigasecond is a good chunk of your life (32 years).
"Calendar frippery" was left entirely to the civilations they visited. Since individual civilizations rarely lasted long enough to see repeat visits from the same ship, it wasn't important for the traders to learn the local calendar in any detail. One of the characters opines that you know you have stayed in port too long when your crew start using the local calendar.
jes5199 · 3 years ago
ah yes, "seconds", the "second minúte part of an hour", i.e. 1/60th of 1/60th of 1/24th of the average time it takes the Earth to rotate towards Sol. very sensible default.
db48x · 3 years ago
No, they obviously use the modern definition based on cesium clocks, or some equivalent. In fact, they set up long–term interplanetary communication systems so that any civilization which had fallen and rediscovered radio could learn their language and units, so customer civilizations mostly used the same definition of a second even though their day/night cycle might be completely different.
mattigames · 3 years ago
Personally I vote for a new unity as a measure of time, the 10+e7 part of the speed of light, so the equivalent to 2.99792458 seconds, it's a sensible default in my opinion, perhaps also another new unity that is the third of that one, it would be very close to a second (in case the space travelers have practical applications to have such measure of time)
db48x · 3 years ago
Or we could just redefine c to be 300,000m/s.
sgjohnson · 3 years ago
that would require redefining of the metre.
db48x · 3 years ago
Only by a little bit. Most people wouldn’t notice.
jessaustin · 3 years ago
How does this work? To get duration from speed, you also need to designate a distance, don't you? What is special about 898,755 km?
saalweachter · 3 years ago
At this point I'll note the watering hole frequency is about 20 cm, giving a conveniently big distance unit without additional parameters. If other, alien species aren't using it already, they'll be jealous enough to switch.
dr_dshiv · 3 years ago
10 hours in a day, 100 minutes in an hour, 100 seconds in a minute.
With that division, seconds would be 0.84 the length of current seconds.
But, one second is exactly 10 alpha cycles in the brain (10 hz), which is the most dominant electrical cycle. So, maybe seconds are biologically sensible. In that case, we need to build a system that connects the rhythms of our biology to the rhythms of our planetary motion. Oh…
tshaddox · 3 years ago
Don’t forget to point out the absurd arbitrariness the kilo part. Base ten number systems are just as arbitrary as the rest of this stuff we’re mocking.
arrrg · 3 years ago
"Kilo-" as a prefix just means thousand, derived from Greek.
Doesn’t seem arbitrary to me. Can you explain what you mean by that?
Of course, all number systems are arbitrary in a sense.
tshaddox · 3 years ago
One thousand is an arbitrary number, and apart from its special place in our base 10 number system is no more special than, say, nine hundred ninety-nine.
mattigames · 3 years ago
I bet that humans at some point will discover thats actually false in the sense that the base 10 system is not completely arbitrary, and brains had an easier time evolving using the base 10 number systems (than say, base 7), and just like electricity flows through the path of least resistence even in other galaxies the same happens with how some areas of the brain evolve, that regardless of their origin they tend to use the base 10 system as well, with some minor differences.
db48x · 3 years ago
I would be willing to bet that some bases are easier than others, with primes being basically impossible, but not that 10 is inherently easier than 8 or 12.
mattigames · 3 years ago
I bet having 10 fingers makes base 10 slightly easier to understand at early ages than 8 or 12 (specially 12 and anything else greater than 10)
db48x · 3 years ago
Yea, but fingers and brains are not strongly correlated. An evolving alien sentience could end up with just about any number of fingers, but most life on Earth has some form of symmetry or other making even numbers more likely. Thus I a can imagine that if we canvassed the entire galactic population, every civilization would use even bases, but there would be no clear bias to 10 in particular. Perhaps a bias away from really large bases, but not one that is in favor of 10 specifically.
mattigames · 3 years ago
I would not discard so easily that brains and fingers are not correlated, I know corvids, dolphins and other species show some level of intelligence but it's nowhere near humans so they are not in the same category to draw conclusions, so the only sample we have is humans, so until we have another sample I wouldn't make any affirmation one way or the other; also we know our advanced tool usage was not only develop due better brains but also due having opposable thumbs.
krick · 3 years ago
Except it would be absolutely impractical to actually use in practice by any species/societies that have to sleep on a regular basis and in general need cycles. If all your "natural cycles" happen to fit well into base-10, well, that's great. Otherwise, you need to base your cycles on something else, which is exactly what calendars do.
And, just by the way, the Gregorian calendar is bad and messy, but the ideas it's built upon are absolutely great and are not results of shower-thinking and twitter-shitposting, but arise from pure practicality. They suit Earth, and humans are earthlings, their cycles are defined by the Earth. A year is a crucial cycle, because it defines weather so much. A day is a crucial cycle, because it defines when it's dark outside. A lunar month is a natural and pretty good cycle, because Moon cycles do actually affect life on Earth, but it isn't crucial, which is exactly the reason, why Gregorian calendar happens to get away with pretty much ignoring this one, unlike a day and a year. Still, it explains why most calendars through history prefer months being close to 27.3 days, and why weeks are 7 days (a quarter of 28). Both cycles also are both long enough and short enough to be useful for practical reasons, like organizing work schedules even without relying on celestial bodies. Furthermore, it even appears they are not enough, which is why the year is divided into "quarters" for business purposes like accounting. And these happen to be fairly close to 30 days, which happens to be a very neat divider of 360, which is close enough to a year on the one side, and a very neat number that naturally divides all small numbers up to 6 on the other side, which makes it easy to work with (unlike base-10, BTW, since that cannot be divided by 3).
All of which explains, why French Republican calendar is actually a great idea and unfortunately failed (for a fairly stupid reason, IMO), and base-10 day is not so great (although it has merit, since modern digits are base-10) and naturally failed.
Now, these totally imaginary and having nothing to do with reality aliens of yours may not have earth-like and human-like cycles, but they surely have cycles of their own. So it is unlikely that magnitude-1000 time measurement with no cycles in-between can work for them either.
db48x · 3 years ago
> So it is unlikely that magnitude-1000 time measurement with no cycles in-between can work for them either.
Oh, maybe I didn’t describe it very well. They use precise scheduling whenever possible, and use kiloseconds and megaseconds in casual conversation. For example, you might be scheduled to go on–shift at 1664204400, and every shift is 30 kiloseconds, meaning you go off–shift at 1664234400. Of course the book never gave exact timestamps like that, it only discussed shifts and watches in general terms.
In casual conversation they use “kiloseconds” or “thousand seconds” the same way we use phrases like “half an hour”. For example: “We got the same scut-work shift starting in two thousand seconds. I thought we could go down to the bactry together, trade gossip.” They also use shorter approximations, like “hundred seconds” the way we might use minutes: ‘In his huds, he could see his ships climbing slowly up the sky, still hidden from the naked eye by the nearest tenement. “Another four hundred seconds sir, and you’ll see them come out past the roof just about there.” He pointed at the spot.’
They just don’t have a calendar based on astronomical cycles. When your STL ship needs 400 years to complete a single journey, and each crewmember spends a very small percentage of that time awake and on watch, you don’t need to care about cycles or calendars. And since each of the hundreds of star system that humans have colonized has a completely different calendar based on whatever astronomical cycles are available locally, so Earth’s calendar just doesn’t matter very much.
gibspaulding · 3 years ago
100 ksecs works out to roughly 27 hours. That's a bit long for a day, but probably not too infeasible to adapt to.
krick · 3 years ago
It's not about the length. It might be a perfect day for them, it's not the point. It's about the fact that you have to use 100 ksec instead of a "day". "Each day" is not the same thing as "each 100 ksecs", since the latter has much more implicit precision. So, practically speaking, your either have a concept of 1-day cycle (because of sleep, sun, or whatever — doesn't matter why they need it and how long must it be for their purposes), or you are stuck with thinking in Unix-time. And if it isn't bad enough for you to fill your calendar in unix-time without "days" or "months" (I can actually believe you might get used to it, somewhat) it makes organisation-level planning and communication hell, if not impossible.
Heck, let's even assume their comfortable "day" cycle is 1ks (after all, they had to chose the length of their second based on something". It still means that their next comfortable MUST be EXACTLY 1 Ms (in their numeric system) to be able to use it as a cycle. If it's off even by 0.1 s, it still will get unusable for thinking and planning sooner or later.
So, yeah, long story short: just think about having all your schedules (like work shifts, payday, train schedules, everything) in Unix-time. I guess this is enough of a clue to arrive by yourself to the conclusion, that calendars (any calendar, that is — not necessarily Gregorian one) are not some "silly tradition of ours", but a really, really useful invention, which is almost for sure a necessity for any civilization, even if it isn't bound to an earth with yearly weather-cycles.
The only way this could work out is if ALL their cycles happen to fit PERFECTLY to orders (degrees) of some number — then they could choose the length of 1 second and their numeric system base accordingly, and I can imagine it being somewhat usable without introducing explicit cycles. But to happen it must be one Math-Wonderland of a Universe they live in. I don't even dare to say it's "implausible". It's... ridiculous.
db48x · 3 years ago
It’s so ridiculous that you have invented something completely unlike what is in the book. They don’t try to force anything to line up to powers of ten, they haven’t changed the length of the second, and they have wearable computers to eliminate any and all annoyances associated with communicating long timestamps.
Although the book only hints at how things are implemented, the result is apparently really flexible. They regularly schedule things that will happen far in the future. Since they make liberal use of suspended animation, their plans need to cover very long periods of time at varying levels of precision. Most of the events of the book take place over approximately a gigasecond (with the average character being awake less than a quarter of that), but the prolog takes place several centuries earlier, and the backstory of one of the main characters covers at least several millenia.
krick · 3 years ago
I had to invent it to imagine some (however far-fetched) conditions under which it would be usable. But it isn't, because these conditions are not practically possible. It's just stupid (as it often happens to be with sci-fi). It is just living without the calendar, that's all that it is. And calendar is a useful invention, basically a necessity for any society out of stone age.
Sure, you can just set up a timer which would alert you at some arbitrary moment in the future that it is time to do something. It's how computers do it (if we forget about leap seconds and such). But the point of the calendar and the clock with sane time units (like a minute and an hour) is to keep the frequency and time of your dentist appointments, train schedules and vacations somewhat workable in your head. Which would be much less fun to do in Unix-time.
db48x · 3 years ago
I don’t find it hard to imagine living without a calendar, or with an arbitrary calendar whose divisions are entirely within my control.
In fact, while it might be a strain to keep everything straight in my head without a traditional calendar, it wouldn’t be difficult using pen and paper. One use for a paper calendar is to record distant future events such as dentist appointments, and I don’t see how that would be harder on a linear timeline instead of a grid of days.
Naturally I have used scheduling software to arrange meetings, and I can imagine how it would work when you don’t have a fixed calendar.
But perhaps I have an unfair advantage. Due to a minor sleep disorder, I have a 25–hour day; I sleep for 8 hours and remain awake for 17. This means that my sleep cycle is never in sync with anyone else, and the limitations of our calendaring software have always been pretty obvious to me. You can imagine the annoyance that dentist appointments cause me, since I never know if I’ll be awake during the day when I am scheduling one. Paper calendars have very limited utility for me.
Bakary · 3 years ago
What about adding a recurring 8 hour calendar block that comes every 17 hours? Then you have a graphical representation of your sleep across time that allows you to fit appointments in.
If you can't program it, and the software makes this hard to do, you can use Amazon Turk or something.
db48x · 3 years ago
Wow, that would be a depressing job to get on Amazon Turk :)
I’m sure there is an API that I could use to add appointments, or I suppose could make an ical file and import it. I don’t quite have enough dentist appointments to make it worth while though. I did however spend an hour to make a spreadsheet. It only predicts my schedule for the next couple of weeks, but historically that’s been good enough for my colleagues.
felipeerias · 3 years ago
So the moral of the story is that having history and cultures is… bad somehow? Or at least weird?
The way I see it, a realistic alien would be more likely to answer
"You think that's complicated? Our own calendar has to track our lifecycle according to the orbit of a planet that doesn't exist any more!"
Or maybe: "Ah, of course, you tend to use base-10 because you have ten fingers. I keep forgetting about those."
…while apologetically waving a mass of tentacles in the air :DIncidentally, I wonder where this trope of aliens as hyperrational observers came from? Because it does not match at all the one instance of a space-going species that we know about (us).
zimpenfish · 3 years ago
> Because it does not match at all the one instance of a space-going species
I think conflating "made it to our local moon" as "space-going" might be the problem there when comparing with "made it to a whole other solar system" as "space-going" aliens.
I should imagine that humanity will have to get a whole lot more logical and hyper-rational before we make it out of our solar system in a repeatable way (assuming we survive that far.)
jelliclesfarm · 3 years ago
I..like many Hindus..follow the lunisolar calender that is based on both the lunar and the solar movements. I have two calenders that run my life..Hindu Panchang that runs in my head for home(mostly based on the moon cycle) and the Gregorian one for the outside world.
My life revolves around the Panchang only and following the Gregorian calender is just like learning to use English as the language for communication. It’s something I have to do to assimilate.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_calendar
Fun fact: (because I like trivia) Nikola Tesla was born July 10, 1856(Gregorian calender), but when he was born, his birth record says June 28, 1856 as Serbia was following Julian calender at that time.
Elon Musk who is known for his company, Tesla Motors was also born on a June 28, Gregorian calender. This random almost-coincidence tickles me for some reason.
krick · 3 years ago
This is a boring way to respond to a post that obviously tries to be funny, but I don't find it funny. There's nothing special about Gregorian calendar. It is shit and unorganized just like hundreds of other things that are shit and unorganized, and would make life easier if we could replace them with something better (which already exists, or very realistically can be designed) via absolutely massive organizational effort. Gregorian calendar can be replaced by French Republican calendar (or one similar to that), imperial unit system can be replaced by metric, all sorts of different clothes' size standards surely can be replaced by one that would actually make sense. There are hundreds of things like that, you encounter them every day. Calendar and units are just some that everyone knows.
To me there's nothing funny about this. This is just sad and annoying, and slightly demoralizing, since it's so simple to fix, yet absolutely impossible to fix by yourself.
Joker_vD · 3 years ago
> all sorts of different clothes' size standards surely can be replaced by one that would actually make sense
Like, imagine if those sizes were equal to some actual body part measurements (or the garment's dimensions itself, whatever) in millimetres/centimetres?
genewitch · 3 years ago
only expensive clothes have reproducible sizes. You can test this yourself. Go pick out 3 different levis jeans that are the same size that ought fit you, in different colors but the same cut. They will all fit slightly differently.
Expensive clothes that are meant to be altered will usually have better tolerances, at least in my experience.
this is one of the main reasons i refuse to buy any clothing intended to be worn outdoors from amazon, shein, aliexpress, ebay, &c.
Infernal · 3 years ago
I have a hard time finding clothes that fit due to being way out on the edge of standard sizing. I have found this similar inconsistency, e.g. I’ll find something I like in my size, order one of each color, and invariably one or two out of four items (that should be roughly identical) will be an 1.5-2 inches out of spec in a way that makes a huge difference (like waist, or inseam, or sleeve length).
Joker_vD · 3 years ago
Well, you can try to order several copies of a piece at once and return those that don't fit... that is, if your market platform allows that. The ones over here recently have started charge a not insignificant amount of money for returns.
Joker_vD · 3 years ago
I know that the tolerances are quote large; but I've personally have experience with 27 size shoes being slightly larger than 29 size shoes from a different brand which is ridiculous IMHO. Those numbers don't mean anything, they differ not only from brand to brand, but from batch to batch even for the same maker, so I don't even know how people manage to buy clothes over Internet: the listed sizes in my experience at best serve as a starting point, then you just try pieces on until you find something that actually fits you.
Which is exactly why I ask for sizes to be garment's actual sizes, not some made up fairy numbers (and don't even get me started on X+S|S|M|L|X+L markings).
6Az4Mj4D · 3 years ago
Aliens have different rotation cycles, why will they bother to know about calendar?
They are after beer.
issung · 3 years ago
This person hates it so much whenever there is a link to their content on this site, they go on huge massive rants about it with threads spamming as much as the OP, it's hilarious.
gcanyon · 3 years ago
Tonally, this thread reminds me a lot of the short story "With Friends Like These..." by Alan Dean Foster: https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/35128.With_Friends_Li...
registeredcorn · 3 years ago
>"uh, it's supposed to be the birth of a religious leader, but they got the math wrong so it's off by 4 years, if he existed at all."
>"if? You based your calendar off the birth date of someone you're not sure exists?"
>"yeah. He's written about in a famous book but historical records are spotty."
I'm not sure why there is such a persistent meme about questioning Jesus' existence.
Certainly, not everyone will believe in the things that He did, nor do I expect them to believe it. However, even among some of the most diehard Atheist Historians, to claim that Christ never existed is something that is easily disproved. See: Dr. Bart D. Ehrman (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43mDuIN5-ww) Keep in mind, Dr. Ehrman is probably one of the most outspoken Atheists critical of both New and Old Testament theology.
There are Atheist celebrities like Dawkins, Hitchens, or Harris, who get a lot of press and coverage, but as far as "In the weeds" detail-oriented historical and archeological debates on up-to-date understanding of the ancient world? Dr. Ehrman is probably in the top 1-5% of Atheist debaters to look towards.
People are welcome to believe whatever they like, but it's just embarrassing to read people write this sort of thing in the same way it's embarrassing to see people repeat the "We only use 10% of our brain" thing.
retrocryptid · 3 years ago
And we have a secondary calendar that just counts the days since some arbitrary date approx 150 years ago. It shares its name with a calendar from 2000 years ago, but it's really named after the father of the guy who came up with it who was named after the guy who established the older calendar.
Also, it's days start in the middle of the other calendar's days
midjji · 3 years ago
And they reply with theirs... Calendars do not trend towards simplicity over time.
betwixthewires · 3 years ago
Expecting aliens to behave like logical automaton vulcans and not have any cultural artifacts in their way of living is a bit simple minded IMO
beltsazar · 3 years ago
> "uh, it's supposed to be the birth of a religious leader, but they got the math wrong so it's off by 4 years, if he existed at all."
> "if? You based your calendar off the birth date of someone you're not sure exists?"
I find it quite offensive. Not all scholars agree that Jesus was raised from dead, but the existence of Jesus is accepted even by non-Christian scholars.
> Virtually all scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed.[7][8][30] Historian Michael Grant asserts that if conventional standards of historical textual criticism are applied to the New Testament, "we can no more reject Jesus' existence than we can reject the existence of a mass of pagan personages whose reality as historical figures is never questioned."[31] There is no indication that writers in antiquity who opposed Christianity questioned the existence of Jesus.[32][33]
rendall · 3 years ago
Let us stop using Wikipedia to support our arguments.
adastra22 · 3 years ago
Can you suggest a source that is more consistently correct?
rendall · 3 years ago
Wikipedia should never be considered a "source", even per its own documentation.
If you must, to support an assertion found in Wikipedia, follow the article's citations and use them. If they even do support the assertion. Quite often, they do not.
adastra22 · 3 years ago
Source can have a broader meaning than just “primary source.”
rendall · 3 years ago
It should not be considered even a "secondary source". It's by intention an aggregator of secondary sources. Which secondary sources are included or excluded, particularly for sensitive or contentious topics, entirely depend on the bias and endurance of the editors of the article, so what you'll get is a grab-bag. Wikipedia has no effective means of detecting and countering, for example, a professional team of coordinated editors, or motivated activists.
As a rule of thumb, think high-school term paper. If that's good enough for your purposes, then sure, use it as a "source".
patatino · 3 years ago
It's a joke, get over it
3pt14159 · 3 years ago
(For background, I'm a Christian.)
I've learned that most of the people online that are 35 or under don't really try to get details right for work like this. It's a sort of intentional sloppiness that portrays a relaxed style in an aloof manner.
I don't especially like it, but I always did wonder how getting out of touch with the young-ins would look and I guess being curmudgeon and pedantic about factual correctness is something I could embrace as I slowly fade out of style.
If the Tweet chain had gotten every other detail right, I'd take some offence too, but this is the internet equivalent of someone goofing off at a party.
Try to roll past it with a head shake.
omegabravo · 3 years ago
You're honestly offended by that? I'm genuinely curious, not trying to be judgemental. It might be a cultural difference
apexalpha · 3 years ago
>Not all scholars agree that Jesus was raised from dead,
Are there any scholars that do agree to this?
Nition · 3 years ago
Well yes, many, but they're Christian scholars.
rendall · 3 years ago
I wonder what the percentage would be of Biblical scholars who believe that Jesus was an actual person if we excluded those who believe, say, Moses parted the Red Sea or even those who believe Jews were enslaved in Egypt at the time.
Nition · 3 years ago
Most scholars, even the non-Christian ones, believe that Jesus was an actual person. Whether he really performanced miracles is of course a very different matter.
rendall · 3 years ago
The set of people I would exclude for shiggles include non-Christians.
Except for the New Testament, there are only 2 other known possible references. One was altered by later Christians, and the other could have referred to a Jew named Chrestus.
Without other external motivation, would this be enough to establish historicity?
hnbad · 3 years ago
The problem with that statement is that if you take away all the supernatural claims and give some room for creative embelishments and naming inaccuracies you end up with not just one but several "actual persons" but their existence becomes entirely irrelevant to the existence of a historical "Jesus".
It's a lot like the "god of the gaps": if you are willing to compromise on a definition of god that gives up on all supernatural claims in history and that only works through mechanisms indistinguishable from natural events, you're no longer talking about the same YHVH that painted fiery letters on a throne room, appeared in burning shrubbery, flooded the entire surface of the Earth and turned people into salt.
I think trying to argue about external facts when studying religion is largely a moot point. It's neat when you can tie religious doctrine and historical accounts together but a religion doesn't cease functioning because its historical claims are inaccurate. The historical claims are entirely accidental to the religion itself and should be viewed as mythological, not empirical.
rendall · 3 years ago
I have met Christians who both understand that argument - that religion and empirical science belong to two distinct, separate magesteria - and reject it. But when I try to dive in to understand why, I do not ever understand their answer.
scoofy · 3 years ago
The argument isn't generally that "Jesus" isn't a person, but rather probably built off one person, but also a collection of stories about people who might be other persons or made up. There were lots of messiahs at the time, and considering that the first gospel was probably written a good 20-to-60 years after the protagonist's death, it seems reasonable to many to presume that some the stories might be stories about other messiahs at the time that got passed on.
It obviously doesn't matter if actual divinity isn't at stake. Did Socrates exist? Maybe... probably? But he's depicted as two very different characters in the two sources we have (Plato and Xenophon). Which one is the 'real' Socrates. What about Homer? What about Achilles? Having long dated historical documents, especially one's that are more about the story than the person gets complicated.
Do I think that a person named some translation of "Jesus" existed, and generally lived the life described in Mark? Sure, maybe... It gets a bit dramatic at times, but it's plausible. Was that the exact same guy as the "Jesus" in Josephus? Hard to say... Maybe? Do I think all the things written in the gospels, and Josephus and the guy referenced by Tacitus all the same Jesus, and were all the things that happened real and/or happened to that specific one person? I find that to be wildly improbable.
Again, it sort of doesn't matter to non-religious folks. I don't think the person in the story needs to be "a person" just like I don't think Plato's depiction of Socrates needs to be 100% accurate, or even mostly accurate (it seems very obvious that liberties were taken). I don't think it really matters whether William Shakespeare or secretly someone else wrote all those plays. It really doesn't matter to people who have a healthy amount of skepticism... It's perfectly fine to admit that we don't know. The stories are still there and they're good stories.
It only really matters if one has built their identity on some long lost non-verifiable, historical parchments being the truth about the universe... I know many people have chosen to do that. I was brought up religious.
adastra22 · 3 years ago
For the record, I'm an atheist that just happens to be interested in biblical archeology and philology. I got no skin in this debate though.
There is very little question that Jesus the human being and Roman subject existed, professed some sort of fanatical messianic religious messages, and got executed for it. Stronger than any evidence for Jesus directly is the evidence for the existence of his brother, James, who was a respected religious leader in Jerusalem for about 25 years after the death of Jesus. It is James that Josephus was writing about--Jesus is only mentioned to explain who James is, "the brother of Jesus who some call Christ." But in addition to this one near-contemporaneous reference, there is also a dozen or so writers who talk about James in the 2nd century. That is a century after his death and the death of his brother, but these writers seem to be working from largely different sources so we can infer multiple historical accounts that would have existed at the time. If we agree that James existed, then the strongest argument for the existence of Jesus is that all of these motivated, non-Christian secular writers of the 1st and 2nd century would have been in a better position to know whether Jesus had existed, and if there was any doubt they would have definitely smeared James as having made up his imaginary brother. But none of them did.
If anyone is interested in this question btw, Reza Aslan's Zealot is an approachable book on the historical Jesus, what little we know for certain and the surprising amount we can confidently infer from the available evidence.
badcppdev · 3 years ago
To me your phrase 'skin in the debate' sums up my feelings about the debate we're having here.
I feel that everyone who wrote historically had skin in the debate and as such I mentally categorise them the same way I treat almost every journalist today. Writers are motivated to choose every word carefully to convince people of their opinions. They mention or exclude people and events for various reasons.
The more polarising the subject the less I trust anyone's words, even twenty centuries later.
troad · 3 years ago
Treating someone with respect is not the same thing as believing what they believe.
badcppdev · 3 years ago
What do you mean you find it offensive?
Are you offended at the assertion that people doubt that Jesus existed at all? As one data point I can assure you that I personally doubt that Jesus existed at all.
Are you offended by people doubting that Jesus existed? If you are a Christian then you are a believer in one of the hundreds of religions from around the world. To be offended that someone doubts the existence of the figures in your holy book is an amazing egotistical statement. Should a follower of Zoroastrianism be offended by someone who doubts the existence of Ahura Mazda?
Are you offended by people doubting that Jesus existed because there are references to him from contemporary historical records? Well I feel that Christianity and other religions have a long record of shamelessly rewriting history and so I basically don't trust anything written down on this subject at all.
1234letshaveatw · 3 years ago
It is convenient to ignore (historical) consensus here isn't it? I am sure you have a similar reaction when certain people disbelieve scientific consensus right? on topics such as vaccination or climate change?
badcppdev · 3 years ago
I'm not sure why you're sure I have a similar reaction about scientific consensus perhaps you've just got .... faith in your feelings. Ba doom tish.
Scientific observations can be repeated. Religion teachings are, almost by definition, the exact opposite.
robbrown451 · 3 years ago
Weeks aren't subdivisions of months, they are completely independent of months and years. There is good reason for this.
Having months alternate between long and short (as they typically do) is a lot better than just having one short month. It would get weird with things like rent payments if you have one month that is way shorter than the others. (although I do wish they chose a 30 day month to occasionally add a 31st day for leap year)
And I'm not sure we'd be better off with time done with multiples of ten rather than highly composite numbers like 24 and 60.
Obviously our system is far from perfect, but it's not all that surprising it is the way it is.
Except for leap seconds. Leap seconds are just stupid. Far better to make adjustments like that much more rarely.
throwawayffffas · 3 years ago
A week is a quarter of a lunar month, we kept them around after months stopped being lunar, because they are kind of nice.
robbrown451 · 3 years ago
Although they'd never be exact....otherwise the full moon would always be the same day of week.
JetAlone · 3 years ago
If aliens tried to quarantine us from the rest of the universe for having an idiosyncratic time keeping system, and keep us ghettoized, it would say more about them than us.
throwawaylinux · 3 years ago
Why would an alien assume we use base 10?
kazinator · 3 years ago
These aliens called babies land in our world all the time and get the calendar just fine.
It takes them a few years, but a lot of that is due to their lagging cognitive abilities, as such; a different calendar redesigned for utmost simplicity would still take them a few years.
hknmtt · 3 years ago
if you are into calendars, read zecharia sitchin's books on anunnaki. the calendar, and zodiac, is 6 000 years old! essentially jews are still following the sumerian calendar to this day. that's also why the creationists say the world is only 6 000 years old. the aztecs were famous for the 2012 end of the world but that was only their calendar and they even had three different cycles that worked together like cogs in a machine.
newswasboring · 3 years ago
Why does this thread assume that aliens will be hyperlogical and not understand what culture is? This is the most ass backwards assumption almost all scifi makes about aliens, at least in my humble opinion. A society which has cracked inter galactic travel will probably have its own vast culture and quirks, i see no reason why not.
ur-whale · 3 years ago
muzani · 3 years ago
Hijri calendar fixes some of the inconsistency. Day naming is just 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, "gathering day", "rest day". Number of days in months are based on the moon phases. Days start on sunset instead of some arbitrary time at night.
There's also a clever, perhaps unintentional naming in days, where the first day is al-Ahad (The One), which is also a name of Allah (Unique, The One). So it's no longer some awkward Sunday or Thor's Day or Zero Day.
thenoblesunfish · 3 years ago
I think I pieced this together from Wikipedia at one point, but don't have the exact ref: The strangeness that December sounds like it should be month ten comes from the fact that in Roman times, it was the tenth and last month. After that there was just.. not much going on until the new year started and in fact it was actually a political question as to which day March started on! Does anyone know this more precisely and/or have a link?
genewitch · 3 years ago
upthread, the year started march 1st which was also the first day of spring, thus making it march, april, may june, quintilis, sextilis, september, october, november, december.
the 12 or 15 day shift at one or more points made the spring equinox "move" from march 1st to "around march 21st", and the "new year" was moved to January 1st. Thus completely misaligning the months and the seasons, and making september the 9th month. To compensate, they renamed the 5th and sixth months to honor a couple of emperors.
Don't cite me.
greggman3 · 3 years ago
I'd be curious to know what countries don't start the year January 1st and where the origin of their chosen day comes from.
I know China's new year is different by a ~3 weeks?
Also, I only know a little USA and Japanese culture but it's interesting various calendar related things like where I grew up, SoCal, elementary, middle, and high school school started 2nd week in September. College also started around the same time. In Japan it starts first week of April and so do new jobs for college grads (Japan generally makes a distinction between no-experience college grads and experienced employees and job listing will often say which one the job is for)
adastra22 · 3 years ago
The Chinese New Year is based on the lunar calendar. How much it differs from the solar calendar changes a lot from year to year. Other East Asian countries don't always share the same lunar new year.
iggldiggl · 3 years ago
> elementary, middle, and high school school started 2nd week in September. College also started around the same time.
And in Germany the academic year at universities traditionally starts in October, with classes starting in the second or third week of October (and my particular alma mater apparently tending to start classes one week even later than a few random other universities I've looked up).
(Which I had to explain to a Canadian border guard when I was visiting Canada near the end of September a few years ago with regards to how come I didn't already have classes if I was claiming to be a student, since in Canada classes had of course already started for the fall term at that point.)
nmeofthestate · 3 years ago
Actual alien: yeah this is quite common with calendars. They tend to have a lot of accumulated rules like that.
Twitter guy: oh damn, I was planning to do a humorous thread about how a super-rational alien civilisation would be surprised by it. :(
ben174 · 3 years ago
Way to rain on their parade.
But yes, any advanced civilization would have stacks upon stacks of rules which contradict and complicate things. There's just no way around it.
ornornor · 3 years ago
Much more readable and lighter link for those who are on mobile without the twitter app or just don’t enjoy twitters UI: https://nitter.net/foone/status/1572260363764400129
noduerme · 3 years ago
It is a shame that the length of a meter isn't based on the Earth's equatorial circumference. Though miles aren't really, it's handy to know there are about 24k of them around, 1k corresponding to an hour of the day. If we take the illogical 24 hour day as a fait accompli then distance is better reduced in round decimals of that than... whatever meter length is based upon (something to do with the weight of a cubic block of water?)
knorker · 3 years ago
Just wait till they hear about other metrics.
"You have this one area, where only 4% of the people live, and they are the only ones using 70 messed up units, including this 'ounce' that's sometimes a volume sometimes an unrelated mass, and this group makes most of the main software, and showing these units?"
"Yeah"
"So everyone understands these units?"
"Nobody except these 4% understand these units at all"
"So when these people say 'gallon' it means nothing at all?"
"Well, do they say liquid gallon, dry gallon, or food gallon? You know what, no matter which there are actually some people outside the 4% who know the word, but to them it's a fourth amount, so no nobody understands it. And yeah to about the remaining 95% it means nothing"
verythroughaway · 3 years ago
This thread is filled with "So what!?" imo.
Like this part:
"and we further subdivide the months into 'weeks', which is 7 days."
"ahh, so each month is an integer multiple of weeks?"
"that would make sense, but no. Only one is, sometimes"
"SOMETIMES?!"
What does it matter?paraknight · 3 years ago
Then there are timezones and daylight savings time...
martin_a · 3 years ago
If Aliens land in New Jersey and find out they're not using the metric system there, they'll leave immediately, no time for talking about calendars.
azureel · 3 years ago
I think most people forget the most important aspect of calendars: farming.
Harvest and plant cycles are stable in this "sun oriented" calendar design.
Every year x type of seed is planted in the same month, and harvested in another. So every year, same months can be planned beforehand.
krazykenny · 3 years ago
Very entertaining! I suppose if we have to start from scratch we might build a better system, but who has the time? It just shows the amount of change that has occured in the past couple of thousand years. Yeah, it might not make sense, but it works...mostly. Just get rid of DST and keep the rest for now!
This reminded me of a Joe Rogan bit, where he imagines how the human race will explain Kim Kardashian to aliens.
Many things will seem illogical to beings who have figured out interstellar travel...
k_sze · 3 years ago
If the world wants a calendar system based on the cycles of nature, with very little political/religious baggage, there is the lunar calendar with the 24 solar terms, used by the Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese people.
vodou · 3 years ago
This is so brilliant! Reminds me of William Burroughs five rules for a revolution in "The Revised Boy Scout Manual":
1. Proclaim a new era and set up a new calendar.
2. Replace alien language.
3. Destroy or neutralise alien gods.
4. Destroy alien machinery of government and Control.
5. Take land and wealth from individual aliens. Time to forget a dead empire and build a living republic.
It was even the first rule to destroy the calendar. He was a genius!
zxcvbnm · 3 years ago
This is why you never let inexperienced people to come up with standards, patterns, and api-s. It is impossible to get rid of crap once it is widely adopted.
keepquestioning · 3 years ago
Why is this guy posting absolute tosh when the world is about to end?
duchenne · 3 years ago
All measurements used to be a mess: lengths, weights, and so on. At the French revolution, they broke the status quo by introducing the metric system. Originally, the metric system also included a new calendar:
- One day has 10 hours.
- One hour is divided in units of 10, 100, 1000 (probably deci/centi/milli hours).
- One week has ten days.
- Each year starts at the fall equinox.
This calendar was used for 14 years. Then, Napoleon decided to bring back the previous calendar system as he reintroduced Catholicism as a state religion. Indeed the revolution calendar was purposely anti-christian: it moved the first year from the birth of JC to the year of the French revolution. Several religious events like Easter were hard to compute. Christmas was the day of the dog...
Anyway, we could have got a calendar system that makes sense, but History decided otherwise.
Hakashiro · 3 years ago
Wait until we have to explain why the most powerful military and politically influential country in the world still insists in using counter-intuitive measurement systems.
mbar84 · 3 years ago
If Julius Caesar had set the leap year rule to be for every year divisible by 5 and/or 19, We would still be using that calendar today. Also would be nice if he had set New Year to be on the winter solstice.
vinay_ys · 3 years ago
Since life on earth is affected significantly by the movements of Sun and Moon, the calendar has to be based on both their positions relative to earth. The calendar system invented in ancient India does this. Check out this illustration in the wikipedia page on Hindu Calendar for a quick understanding. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hindu_Lunisolar_Calendar....
snowmizuh-04 · 3 years ago
Actually, I think explaining our calendar would be one of the more interesting points of discussion. In fact, the very fact that this is somewhat controversial with folks feeling our calendar is 'illogical' reveals a lot about the current generation's materialistic, efficiency-obsessed world view.
It's like we've all lost the ability to see and understand symbolism and tradition.
Things to consider about the calendar in the West: 1. The West was once a Christian realm. The calendar reflects this. Lots of interesting history here, starting at least with Constantine. 2. I only _this_ year have noticed a push to make Monday the first day of the week. My first thought when I noticed this: it's explicitly an effort to de-emphasize #1. Sunday is the first day of the week because of the importance of the Resurrection for Christians. Changing Monday to the first day of the week is basically the same move the Jacobins for example attempted when they reset the year to 'years since the revolution' instead of 'anno Domini'. 3. Not all the 'West' uses the same calendar. The Orthodox East generally still uses the 'old' Julian calendar. There is currently a 13 day difference between the Julian and Gregorian. This is one of the reasons that Pascha (Easter) usually is celebrated on a different day in the Orthodox East than the Roman West (yes, Protestants, you're still with the Pope on this one). 4. p.s. the process by which the Gregorian calendar was inplemented is actually a very interesting story. There basically was a missing week in Oct when this was done (around 1430 as I recall?). 5. It gets better. Some Orthodox like the Russians celebrate Christmas on the old Julian calendar, which translates to Jan 5 on the Gregorian. 6. (Main point!) the calendar itself is _liturgical_. Feasts, fasts, death, regeneration. All these things are reflected in the calendar. Liturgy is fractal. It happens in the Church and is echoed higher and lower throughout different hierarchies. If you are at all interested in this, please look up Jonathan Pageau. He has some great podcasts and youtube videos...
It really is quite beautiful.
Unless you are a nerd and just want us to switch to stardates. Easier to program I guess but thoroughly boring and dehumanizing.
p.p.s. It occurs to me that not everyone will understand 'Orthodox East' and 'Roman West'. By Orthodox East, I basically mean Palestine and the Middle East, Egypt, Ethiopia, Greece, Eastern Europe, and Russia. Think the New Rome (Constantinople) and those lands once controlled by New Rome, e.g. the 'Eastern Roman Empire'. By 'Roman West', I mean Western Europe and those nations colonized or influenced by Western European countries. Perhaps more simply, 'Romain Catholic' realms.
Alosra · 3 years ago
I get that it's about being funny, but the roman calender is not completely universal either, there is at least Iran, my home country and afghanestan which has the solar hijri calender as it's first official calender which is very much logical and accurate. You can visit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_Hijri_calendar For more info
Also in Iran the week starts with saturday.
If you look from an american or a british person these are all valid points and I got the fun and laughed but couldn't help my self not saying all these And I'm sure Iran is just an instance
muro · 3 years ago
During the French revolution, they changed the calendar to be "more scientific". Worked about as well as can be imagined.
Arcorann · 3 years ago
I once read a story in which a human gave an extraterrestrial visitor a calendar to examine and they were confused as to all the inconsistency. I then wondered how they would react if we gave them a Malaysian wall calendar instead:
- Four calendars (Gregorian, Islamic, Chinese, Hindu)
- Three scripts (Latin, Chinese, Tamil)
- Two solar (Gregorian, Hindu), neither synced with the other, with varying month lengths (29-32 for the Hindu, but at least months follow solar longitudes properly; Gregorian doesn't really follow anything)
- Two lunar (Chinese, Islamic), also offsync (Chinese starts months on new moon, Islamic on first visible crescent) and Chinese has leap months while Islamic doesn't.
- Weekday names in four languages (English, Malay, Chinese, Tamil)
It'd certainly be a puzzle for our hypothetical alien.
jjk166 · 3 years ago
Alien: So what is your first month?
Human: January
A: And why is it called that?
H: It's named for the god Janus.
A: Ah yes, many civilizations name their time divisions after deities, what is he the god of?
H: I don't know, we don't worship him anymore.
A: Ahh so you guys have moved past your need for religion
H: No, no, we still worship gods, just different ones.
A: Okay then, how about February, what god is that month named for?
H: Actually February is named for the festival of februalia.
A: Oh can you tell me a little more about this festival?
H: No, we don't celebrate it.
A: Are there any months that aren't named for gods you don't worship or festivals you don't celebrate?
H: There's July, named for Julius Caesar, a ruler.
A: Oh he must have been one of your best rulers to get a month named after him, what is he so notable for?
H: We stabbed him.
A: ...
H: A lot.
A: ...was he stabbed in July?
H: No, we stabbed him in March.
A: Okay are there any months not named for gods you don't worship, festivals you don't celebrate, or rulers you don't like?
H: Well October just means eight.
A: Finally, something that makes sense! Okay so your eighth month is just eight-
H: Tenth.
A: What?
H: October is our tenth month.
A: Why wouldn't you name your eighth month October?
H: We named that one after a guy.
A: What was his name?
H: Octavian, which coincidentally translates to eighth.
A: Don't tell me you have both an October and an Octover...
H: Don't be silly, no we named it August.
A: I'm just gonna go out on a limb here and guess August doesn't mean eight, does it?
H: Nah it means first.
A: Yeah, we're not letting you into our galactic federation.
povils · 3 years ago
Funny! :D the said alien should then talk with Lithuanian because every month name more or less is describes what is happening during that month
povils · 3 years ago
A
HeavyStorm · 3 years ago
The alien's report: "this planet is inhabited by humans, a species whose brain is not mathematical, instead, has a special appreciation for myths, stories etc."
usrusr · 3 years ago
They will suspect us as secret purists who only pretend to be open to contact, until we explain or calendar. Then they'll accept that our diversity claims might in fact contain a grain of truth or two.
Yes, it's true that one crazy mix instead of dozens, competing, could also be construed as the result of one cultural framework steamrolling all the others (and the steam pun is certainly intended), but people who want to go down that part should better have a probable backlog of praise for java's pluggable calendars or reconsider.
amai · 3 years ago
Base 60 and 12/24 make sense, because these are https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highly_composite_number .
The rest is so bad, that it needed one of the best mathematicians who ever lived on our planet to compute the date of our highest religious festival: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_of_Easter#Gauss's_Easter_...
We even named our electric calculation machines computer after the act of calculating the day of Easter: Computus.
nisan · 3 years ago
Interesting nit: The moon's _sidereal_ period is 27 days. But the _synodic_ period is 29.5 days, and that means there are 12.4 lunar months in a year.
(If the moon were somehow stationary relative to the earth, it would still go through a full cycle of phases, giving us one lunar month for free.)
nagonago · 3 years ago
Obligatory link to Falsehoods programmers believe about time: https://gist.github.com/timvisee/fcda9bbdff88d45cc9061606b4b...
Olumde · 3 years ago
I expected the thread to end thusly:
Aliens: "FOR ALL THIS YOU MUST DIE."
Humans: "Fair enough"